Unifying Themes in Complex Systems X

Shrunken Social Brains? A Minimal Model of the Role of Social Interaction in Neural Complexity

cxdig's avatarComplexity Digest

Georgina Montserrat Reséndiz-Benhumea, Ekaterina Sangati, Federico Sangati, Soheil Keshmiri and Tom Froese

The social brain hypothesis proposes that enlarged brains have evolved in response to the increasing cognitive demands that complex social life in larger groups places on primates and other mammals. However, this reasoning can be challenged by evidence that brain size has decreased in the evolutionary transitions from solitary to social larger groups in the case of Neolithic humans and some eusocial insects. Different hypotheses can be identified in the literature to explain this reduction in brain size. We evaluate some of them from the perspective of recent approaches to cognitive science, which support the idea that the basis of cognition can span over brain, body, and environment. Here we show through a minimal cognitive model using an evolutionary robotics methodology that the neural complexity, in terms of neural entropy and degrees of freedom of neural activity, of…

View original post 98 more words

Illuminate — The Systems Sanctuary

Always worth keepoing an eye on all the work and offers from the Systems Sanctuary – www.systemssanctuary.com – along with the big developments in the ‘developing the field of systems change’ space, below.

An Invitation: Gather for Illuminate’s Solstice Soirée Luis Alejandro Tapia, Joining us as Illuminate’s ‘Network Doula’. Monday June 21 @ 1 – 3 pm pm EST RSVP below.

Illuminate — The Systems Sanctuary

Illuminate: Cultivating the field of systems change practice

Illuminate_Logo-01.png

An Invitation: Gather for Illuminate’s Solstice Soirée

Monday June 21 @ 1 – 3 pm pm EST

RSVP below.

Online gathering to celebrate and find out more

An invitation to connect to Illuminate at a pivotal stage. Over the last 18 months, we have launched inquiries, new nodes and learning communities.  We have leveraged our collective networks to engage more deeply and more internationally, to meet the needs of the emerging field of systems change in its many expressions and practices. 

We invite you to join us for an Illuminate gathering where we will share our learnings, celebrate our wins, and invite collaborators to our network of Illuminators.

Learn about our call for proposals and inquiries

We will be sharing a call for proposals/action to invite new nodes and inquires into the work of Illuminate. RSVP FOR ILLUMINATE’S SOLSTICE SOIRÉE HERE

Introducing Luis Alejandro, Network Doula

Luis Alejandro, has spent the last year supporting the strategy development of Illuminate, and he is now stepping into his new role as Network Doula.

He will lead the design and hosting of the Solstice event.

About Illuminate

What’s the deal?

Illuminate is a collaborative network designed to connect people committed to cultivating the field and practice of systems change towards a just, equitable and regenerative future for all.

We, Tatiana and Rachel (The Systems Sanctuary) have been involved in this field building initiative since its inception In June 2018.

The Systems Sanctuary’s role in the network

Specifically Tatiana has Chaired the Stewardship Group for 18 months and she and Rachel have acted as a ‘start-up crew’, kicking off various nodes in the network including:

  • Working with Anna Birney to kick off the Learning node – where all the leads of different nodes come together to learn and the funders node.
  • Led on branding, positioning and website development
  • Both served on the Stewardship group
  • Set-up processes for how we work together as collaborative partners
  • Led an equity working group to integrate intersectional lens across Illuminate
  • Led on financial strategy, model development & secured funding
  • Led a strategy working group
  • Setup fiduciary partners in different regions

Background to Illuminate

Along with Anna Birney (Forum for the Future) and Darcy Ridell (at McConnell at the time), we supported the design and co-convening of an event on Wasan Island, Canada.

Here we brought together practitioners, academics, and funders to explore together how we might work together to build the field of systems change.

The outcome of this was a report and the beginnings of a network of people who’d been working on building the field in different contexts’ and wanted to explore ‘what could we do together that we can’t do alone?’

On the history of Ludwig von Bertalanffy’s “General Systemology”, and on its relationship to cybernetics – three articles – Pouvreau and Drack (2007, 2014, 2015)

On the history of Ludwig von Bertalanffy’s “General Systemology”, and on its relationship to cybernetics

Part I: elements on the origins and genesis of Ludwig von Bertalanffy’s “General Systemology”David Pouvreau  &Manfred DrackPages 281-337 | Received 26 Sep 2006, Accepted 20 Sep 2006, Published online: 22 Feb 2007

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03081070601127961

Part II: Contexts and developments of the systemological hermeneutics instigated by von Bertalanffy

David PouvreauPages 172-245 | Received 10 Nov 2013, Accepted 22 Dec 2013, Published online: 05 Feb 2014

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03081079.2014.883743

part III: convergences and divergences

Manfred Drack &David PouvreauPages 523-571 | Received 07 Aug 2014, Accepted 29 Nov 2014, Published online: 23 Feb 2015

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03081079.2014.1000642

A Practitioner Tool for Developing and Measuring the Results of Interventions | Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability – Zivkovic (2021)

A Practitioner Tool for Developing and Measuring the Results of Interventions | Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability

A Practitioner Tool for Developing and Measuring the Results of Interventions

Authors

  • Sharon ZivkovicUniversity of South Australia

DOI: 

https://doi.org/10.33423/jsis.v16i1.4183

Keywords: 

sustainability, innovation, wicked problems complex measurement tool interventions

Abstract

It is not uncommon for practitioners to attempt to address a wicked problem by developing an intervention that only addresses a few of the problem’s underpinning causal factors and not the wicked problem in its entirety. To address the whole wicked problem, practitioners need to work through collaborative networks to transition ecosystems of initiatives to a new improved state, or develop interventions that create systems change by influencing others to take action. This paper examines a matrix tool that was created to assist practitioners to develop and evaluate interventions that address simple, complicated, complex and wicked problems. The tool highlights that the type of intervention and the type of measurement that is most appropriate will depend on the scope and the causal logic of the intervention. The four quadrants of the matrix are: basic services, integrated services, social movements and solution ecosystems. To demonstrate how this tool can assist practitioners to develop and measure the results of initiatives, the paper refers to two Australian case studies.

Critical Systems Thinking: What has been done and what needs doing – Tue 22 Jun 2021 at 12:00 UK time with Prof Michael C Jackson – the third event in the jubilee celebrations of 50 years of Systems Thinking in Practice at The Open University

JUN 22 Critical Systems Thinking: What has been done and what needs doing

Critical Systems Thinking: What has been done and what needs doing Tickets, Tue 22 Jun 2021 at 12:00 | Eventbrite

JUN

22

Critical Systems Thinking: What has been done and what needs doing

by The Open University, Faculty of STEM FollowingFree

Event Information

Professor Michael C Jackson presents the third seminar to critically examine what has been done and what needs doing in systems thinking.

About this event


		Critical Systems Thinking: What has been done and what needs doing image

Welcome to the third event in the jubilee celebrations of 50 years of Systems Thinking in Practice at The Open University!

In the wake of the pandemic, confronted by human-induced climate change and exposed to a gamut of vulnerabilities within our societies, many commentators call for investment in thinking and acting differently, particularly with systems thinking in practice, or STiP. The Open University (OU, based in the UK) is well-placed to respond to this imperative of our times because it has been one of the significant investors in STiP education over the last 50 years. In 1971 a new academic department was created; Systems thinking practitioners (STPs) collaborated to design and then present a new undergraduate course called Systems behaviour (T241). This was a pioneering achievement in the UK’s first supported open, distance teaching university. Worldwide, there have been nearly 50,000 OU STiP students.

Fifty years on, the OU has a thriving postgraduate suite of qualifications in systems thinking in practice (STiP) and extensive experience in designing and delivering STiP education and scholarship. In 2021, the OU celebrates this continued unique pioneering tradition of fostering STiP capabilities for lifelong learning and managing change in broad-ranging professional contexts with nearly 250 graduates in recently named degrees.

Please join us through 2021 to celebrate this unique achievement and add your support to what has become an urgent global need – the more excellent capability to think and act systemically. We will have a series of events, blogs and engaging discussions that you are welcome.

Want to keep learning about STiP? Check out our OpenLearn platform that offers free courses on hundreds of subjects, including STiP!

#OUSTiP #OUSTiP50

Professor Jackson’s topic:

Critical Systems Thinking and Practice: What has been done and what needs doing

In 1979 the four UK universities that had groups or departments teaching ‘systems’ – Aston, City, Lancaster, and the Open University – established the UK Systems Society (UKSS). Number 3 of the UKSS Newsletter (June 1980) has a map of the distribution of the membership by postcode. Professor Jackson will discuss the research programme in critical systems thinking and practice that developed at Hull in the early 1980s and has continued for 40 years. He will assess what has been achieved and what still needs to be done and will relate the work at Hull to what has happened in systems thinking elsewhere in the UK, particularly at the Open University.


		Critical Systems Thinking: What has been done and what needs doing image

Get to know…Professor Michael C Jackson

Michael C. Jackson is an Emeritus Professor at the University of Hull and MD of Systems Research Ltd. He graduated from Oxford University, gained an MA from Lancaster University and a PhD from Hull, and has worked in the civil service, in academia and as a consultant. Between 1999 and 2011, Mike was Dean of Hull University Business School, leading it to triple-crown accreditation. Mike has been President of the International Federation for Systems Research and the International Society for the Systems Sciences. He was editor-in-chief of Systems Research and Behavioral Science for 26 years. Mike is a Companion of the Association of Business Schools, a Chartered IT Professional, and a Fellow of the British Computer Society, the Cybernetics Society, the Chartered Management Institute, the Operational Research Society, the International Federation for Systems Research, and the International Academy for Systems and Cybernetic Sciences. He has received many awards, two honorary degrees, and has been a visiting professor at numerous international universities. In 2011 he was awarded an OBE for services to higher education and business. In 2017 he received the Beale Medal of the UK Operational Research Society for ‘a sustained contribution over many years to the theory, practice, and philosophy of Operational Research’. Mike is known as a key figure in the development of ‘critical systems thinking’ – a topic on which he has published ten books and over 150 articles. His latest book ‘Critical Systems Thinking and the Management of Complexity’ was published by Wiley in April 2019.

Designing temporal networks that synchronize under resource constraints

cxdig's avatarComplexity Digest

Yuanzhao Zhang & Steven H. Strogatz
Nature Communications volume12, Articlenumber:3273 (2021)

Being fundamentally a non-equilibrium process, synchronization comes with unavoidable energy costs and has to be maintained under the constraint of limited resources. Such resource constraints are often reflected as a finite coupling budget available in a network to facilitate interaction and communication. Here, we show that introducing temporal variation in the network structure can lead to efficient synchronization even when stable synchrony is impossible in any static network under the given budget, thereby demonstrating a fundamental advantage of temporal networks. The temporal networks generated by our open-loop design are versatile in the sense of promoting synchronization for systems with vastly different dynamics, including periodic and chaotic dynamics in both discrete-time and continuous-time models. Furthermore, we link the dynamic stabilization effect of the changing topology to the curvature of the master stability function, which provides analytical insights into synchronization on…

View original post 35 more words

De Profundis: Ranulph Glanville’s Transcendental Framework for Second-order Cybernetics | Müller – (2015)

De Profundis: Ranulph Glanville’s Transcendental Framework for Second-order Cybernetics 1 Karl Müller 270 Views 22 Pages 1 File ▾ Ranulph Glanville was a prolific writer, a magic designer, an avant-garde musician, a cybernetician of the first-and of the second-order, a philosopher in disguise, to name only a few roles. His contributions to second-order cybernetics and to areas like design, philosophy, conversation theory, methodology or games, with the tools and perspectives of his version of second-order cybernetics were collected under the title The Black B∞x in three volumes in edition echoraum (Glanville, 2009, 2012, 2014) and were ordered and arranged by Ranulph Glanville himself so that they allow a general and systematic overview on this very large, diverse, and impressive corpus. In this short essay I will undertake a systematic attempt to make this work more easily accessible for others, including myself, and to provide a special location for Ranulph Glanville within the research program of second-order cybernetics in particular and within the research tradition of radical constructivism in general. It will become my central thesis in this article that Ranulph Glanville’s special role and function was to provide a meta-approach to all the available research programs in radical constructivism. This framework was transcendental in nature and focused on the conditions of the possibility for observation, for communication, for language, for knowledge or for learning to emerge at all. Thus, Ranulph Glanville reserved a unique place for himself that, at the same time, turned out to be magic for his explorations and very difficult to grasp for his intellectual environment.

(PDF) De Profundis: Ranulph Glanville’s Transcendental Framework for Second-order Cybernetics 1 | Karl Müller – Academia.edu

The Cybernetics of Brand Tickets, Tue 22 Jun 2021 at 18:00 UK time – CybSights

JUN 22 The Cybernetics of Brand

The Cybernetics of Brand Tickets, Tue 22 Jun 2021 at 18:00 | Eventbrite

JUN 22

The Cybernetics of Brand

by CybSights: The Insights Series Following

Event Information

What cybernetics tells us about brand and brand about cybernetics and what these together tell us that is important.

About this event

The Insights Series is an eclectic and learned collection of monthly events on the 4th Tuesday of each month hosted by Cybernetics Society. There will be lectures, seminars, conversations, debates, participation, all advancing our knowledge of cybernetics and related disciplines and their applications to real world needs. Speakers present their own views, without formal endorsement.

Cybernetics is the science of achievement, the great meta-discipline of our time.

The CybSights Insights series is normally curated and hosted by the Secretary, Angus Jenkinson, FCybS. Attendance is free. Non-members are invited to make an optional donation or to Join.

In this session we welcome an Australian.

We are particularly delighted to be able to welcome Tim Falkiner with his experience in town planning, law, and legilstion with ‘homeskooled’ cybernetics.

The Cybernetics of Brand

In this talk, I am interested in exploring three different aspects of the topic of ‘brand’. Firstly, what does cybernetics tell us about brand. Brand is an energetic concept and important operational and commercial aspect of the contemporary business world and indeed of more than just businesses — political parties, politicians, cities, even countries. What is it and how does it relate to identity and other fundamentals? The second aspect is what looking at this might tell us about cybernetics. What is the distinctive go of cybernetics? Sometimes looking into the detailed examples is a good way to learn and think.

But there is a third and possibly even a fourth aspect. What does it tell us about companies themselves? What might that tell us about the world, human and natural? And the nature of the their systemic organization? And then there is the distinctiveness of cybernetics itself — let us say as ‘a brand’ in the field of systemic thinking.

My interest in this is not merely academic or scholarly or even technical. Businesses and companies are a huge part of our world — huge in terms of their influence, power to do good or ill, and so contribution to the essentials and failures of modern civilisation. Billions of people are employed by and dependent on them and they are getting tougher to manage as they get bigger and more complex. ‘Brand’ matters to citizens, consumers, policy makers, leaders.Businesses and companies are a huge part of our world

I am going to relate brand to customers, to value, to values; to processes and organization; to identity and purposes and why we are all here. And in this also to other classic management questions like culture, business model, and intelligent systems.

But I would also like to look at such fundamental questions as observers and how they see the world and what that means practically and scientifically. How do we need to rethink scientific method itself given the pragmatic reality and empirical fact of “brand” as a contemporary world phenomenon? A competent science should be able to deal with it. Does science have the requisite variety in its methods? Is it fit for purpose?

And to make sure that there is some usefulness for those who would like something useful I will try to share some practical approaches. And I will try to do so by taking actual situations and not just abstract notions.

By the way I will be speaking in another forum on a related topic at about the same time but with a special interest in VSM and so in this one, although I will refer to Stafford Beer’s Viable System Model, it will not be the main focus.

General Systems Theory – von Bertalanffy (1968)

Systems Thinking – Valerie Iles

Briefing Paper One: Systems thinking This briefing paper gives: the origins of systems thinking, a definition of systems thinking and of a system, the history of systems thinking and its major tenets, some of the major systems approaches, problems with systems thinking,  insights afforded by systems thinking, and references.

Systems Thinking

An pretty good introduction

Job opportunity: Postdoctoral Researcher in Computational Modelling, @PANDEM2H2020 project. System dynamics/computational modelling to design resource planning analytics to support pandemic planning.

snuigalway and @DSIatNUIG are hiring a Postdoctoral Researcher in Computational Modelling to work on our exciting @PANDEM2H2020 project. The role involves the use of system dynamics/computational modelling to design resource planni

(2) Jim Duggan on Twitter: “Link to the application information here: https://t.co/L5SVTtgBzJ” / Twitter

Information (word doc):

https://t.co/L5SVTtgBzJ?amp=1

How To Win At Risk By Using Systems [Dynamics] – The System Is Down – Andy Patton

why is it always still Systems Dynamics, I wonder?

source:

How To Win At Risk By Using Systems Thinking – The System Is Down

How To Win At Risk By Using Systems Thinking

Systems Thinking gives you an advantage in almost every area of life – even the game of Risk.

Andy Patton7 hr ago35

Systems thinking is a way of viewing complicated networks in reality in terms of the relationships between the parts and the whole. It is about thinking holistically about such relationships so as to (1) truly understand how they work and (2) change them for the better.

The best strategies in life (and in games) come from systems thinking. This is the case because things are far more complicated than they seem at first glance and it takes careful attention to come to know them. Systems thinking offers names and categories for understanding the complexity of reality—and you can’t really know anything without first giving it a name.

continues in source

How To Win At Risk By Using Systems Thinking – The System Is Down

Systems Thinking Ontario – 2021-06-14

source:

Systems Thinking Ontario – 2021-06-14

2021-06-14

June 14 (the second Monday of the month) is the 91sh meeting for Systems Thinking Ontario. The registration is on Eventbrite at https://synthesis-map-expo-2021-1.eventbrite.ca.

Synthesis Map Expo 2021 (#1), Strategic Foresight and Innovation program

Every year Systems Thinking Ontario hosts a series of summer evening events for presentations of synthesis maps (complex systems maps) created in systemic design courses in OCAD University graduate programs.

  • This first evening, June 14, we have three presentations.
  • The second evening, July 12, we’re considering to have another three presentations.
  • The third evening, August 9, we’re holding if there is more interest

Synthesis maps are rich visualizations that illustrate the real-world complexity of systemic challenges, and typically used to not only “map system problems” but to propose design recommendations for systems change and policies (from health to public policy, from service experiences to social change) from evidence gathered in stakeholder research. Policymakers and organizational stakeholders use synthesis maps for strategic advising, long-term planning, and considering interventions for social and systemic challenges (wicked problems).

While we are still sorting out the final slate of presenters, we are expecting:

  • Emerging Possibilities for Users in a Web 3.0 Social Media Ecology (Frontiers for Facebook?)
  • New Economics Team – Social Purpose Economy in Canada
  • TBD

Venue:

  • The link for a Zoom conference will be sent upon preregistration.
  • It’s really too bad that we can’t use the OCADU Visual Analytics Lab to meet in person!

Suggested pre-reading:

What are Synthesis Maps and Gigamaps? at https://slab.ocadu.ca/project/synthesis-maps-gigamaps

ASC Series #7: Partial Memories of Mary Catherine Bateson – Nora & Sevanne Tickets, Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 12:00 PM EST

We start with Jude Lombardi interviewing Mary Catherine’s daughter Sevanne and sister Nora and then you tell us your story.

ASC Series #7: Partial Memories of Mary Catherine Bateson – Nora & Sevanne Tickets, Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 12:00 PM | Eventbrite
American Society for Cybernetics just announced a new event
ASC Series #7: Partial Memories of Mary Catherine Bateson - Nora & Sevanne
 
 ASC Series #7: Partial Memories of Mary Catherine Bateson – Nora & Sevanne Sunday, June 20, 2021 at 12:00 PM