announcing The Necessary Tangle – a living evidence atlas of systems | cybernetics | complexity

I’ve been wanting for years to do a ‘better map’ of systems | complexity | cybernetics, having strongly criticised the Castellani ‘complexity map’ and seen some others – and been involved in the SCiO SysBoK where we tried to map key concepts, their necessary antecedents and dependent thingummies, people, meaning, and so on (- and always inspired by ‘rock family trees’ and the way it’s the constellation of influences and people around individual practitioners that actually makes the difference, as David Ing says).

So with the assistance of ChatGPT, and I’ve been building The Necessary Tangle – a living, evidence-backed atlas of systems | complexity | cybernetics.

It currently maps 411 public entries and 32 developed profiles from 93 registered sources.

The key difference from the usual family tree is that every line has to say what sort of relationship it represents: logical antecedent, historical precursor, documented influence, teaching, collaboration, practical use, and so on.

The eventual ambition to: trace the human as well as conceptual lineages; connect theory to practice; distinguish espoused intellectual genealogy from the clusters the evidence actually produces; and let categories emerge from the resulting network rather than deciding the schools in advance.

It’s very much a public alpha. Some areas are already quite deep; others are little more than markers saying ‘this belongs here’. I’m putting it out now precisely because corrections, missing connections, rival genealogies and ‘surely you can’t say that’ responses are part of building it.

AND I’m very happy to share, collaborate or whatever….

Have a look
https://transduction.systems

Benjamin
www.antlerboy.com

Ryan Haecker – Breaking the Cybernetic Silence

Breaking the Cybernetic Silence – Ryan Haecker

Nick Land, Ryan Haecker, and the Problem of Cybernetic Consciousness

Nick Land, Ryan Haecker, and the Problem of Cybernetic Consciousness

The Viable Change Framework: Linking Theory of Change and Organisational Viability for Quality Enhancement in Higher Education

The Viable Change Framework: Linking Theory of Change and Organisational Viability for Quality Enhancement in Higher Education – Clark – Systems Research and Behavioral Science – Wiley Online Library

The Firm Grip and the Light Hand – Jose (2026)

ASHBY’S LABORATORY | AN INTRODUCTION TO CYBERNETICS | CHAPTERS 03—06 – Shadow Rebbe (2026)

[A nice use of vibe coding]

ASHBY’S LABORATORY | AN INTRODUCTION TO CYBERNETICS | CHAPTERS 03—06
Glossary ↗
•••
56 EXPERIMENTS · FOUR INDEPENDENT CHAPTERS
Learn the machine.
By changing it.
Predict, wire, disturb, and investigate. Discover Ashby’s concepts through his exercises, with corrections that show exactly where a prediction breaks.

Enter chapter 3 ↗
How the lab works

Ashby’s Laboratory — Learn by experimenting
https://ashby-laboratory.benjaming98765.chatgpt.site

Hezen 2.0 – Treister (2009-2011) | cybernetic tarot

https://www.suzannetreister.net/HEXEN2/HEXEN_2.html

HEXEN 2.0 Suzanne Treister 2009-2011HEXEN 2.0 looks into histories of scientific research behind government programmes of mass control, investigating parallel histories of countercultural and grass roots movements. HEXEN 2.0 charts, within a framework of post-WWII U.S. governmental and military imperatives, the coming together of scientific and social sciences through the development of cybernetics, the history of the internet, the rise of Web 2.0 and increased intelligence gathering, and implications for the future of new systems of societal manipulation towards a control society.HEXEN 2.0 specifically investigates the participants of the seminal Macy Conferences (1946-1953), whose primary goal was to set the foundations for a general science of the workings of the human mind. The project simultaneously looks at diverse philosophical, literary and political responses to advances in technology including the claims of Anarcho-Primitivism and Post Leftism, Theodore Kaczynski/The Unabomber, Technogaianism and Transhumanism, and traces precursory ideas such as those of Thoreau, Warren, Heidegger and Adorno in relation to visions of utopic and dystopic futures from science-fiction literature and film.Based on actual events, people, histories and scientific projections of the future, and consisting of alchemical diagrams, a Tarot deck, photo-text works, a video and a website, HEXEN 2.0 offers a space where one may use the works as a tool to envision possible alternative futures.


Also see: essay by Lars Bang Larsen

Bernhard Sterchi – Complexity Theory and Neo-Kantian Theory of Science – Tuesday, Oct 20 · 5:00pm UK time, The Complexity Lounge, online

https://www.meetup.com/complexitylounge/events/316861213

Where are the systems in ‘systems leadership’? Leaderism, personal development, and the work of changing systems – Taylor (2026)

Where are the systems in ‘systems leadership’?

Steven Hertzberg on LinkedIn – ‘AI research has rediscovered the Macy Conferences, and again without any attribution’

Steven Hertzberg

AI research has rediscovered the Macy Conferences, and again without any attribution.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/stevenhertzberg_ai-research-has-rediscovered-the-macy-conferences-share-7517264837421203456-REiP/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAACuq-oBecVFDW6PCf3lkoG-peMeuLBeoho

Epiplexity (epistemic complexity)

“Epiplexity (epistemic complexity) is a formal information-theoretic framework introduced by researchers at NYU and CMU to measure learnable structure for computationally bounded systems like neural networks. It fundamentally challenges classical Shannon entropy by accounting for observer limitations.”

“Core Framework Paradoxes Solved

  • Deterministic Functions: Explains how deterministic simulations generate new, learnable structural information for bounded observers.
  • Sequence Dependence: Accounts for data order and training curricula, which classical symmetric metrics ignore.
  • Inductive Biases: Focuses on the structural shortcuts internalized during training rather than pure distribution matching.”

Primary Resources

AI Agents Gone Wild, and the Dangers of Inference

AI Agents Gone Wild, and the Dangers of Inference

Modelling Prevention Policy Impacts on Local Authority-Funded Social Care Services in England: A System Dynamics Modelling Approach

Modelling Prevention Policy Impacts on Local Authority-Funded Social Care Services in England: A System Dynamics Modelling Approach

What’s in a name? From Norbert Wiener’s Teleology to Artificial Intelligence

https://www.systemspractice.org/resources/whats-name-norbert-wieners-teleology-artificial-intelligence

The Strategy Dynamics Insights Library

https://www.sdcourses.com/blog

Richard S O’Rourke – Two entropies, two cornerstones

Richard S O’Rourke — thermodynamics, cybernetics & political economy