STREAMS Wiki – Systems Thinking, Real Enterprise Architecture and Management Science – Ian Glossop

What is STREAMS?

STREAMS is an acronym that stands for:

 Systems Thinking, Real Enterprise Architecture and Management Science.

It is a set of ideas about how to build and manage an Enterprise based on a common, rigorous STREAMS Philosophy. It leads to methodologies, methods and techniques for building, managing, evolving and innovating Enterprises that can be applied in practice but, like an Engineering approach, its methods are grounded in rigorous research and understanding.

Common to the three main strands, or tributaries, of STREAMS is the Use of Models: conceptual models of a variety of descriptions and characteristics ranging from highly complex mathematical models informed by volumes of quantitative data grounded in empirical observation and measurement to simple qualitative models expressing some simple truth. The purpose of the models is to guide Decision Making.

STREAMS is a set of ideas that are both transdisciplinary and integrative of theory and practice. It is “Trans-disciplinary” in the sense that it eclectically draws on ideas, theories, principles and methods from a range of academic disciplines – deliberately paying no heed to the traditional divisions in universities – or similar academic institutions. It is “Integrative” in the sense that is seeks to blend these ideas into a coherent, well-founded theoretical framework – but also incorporate emrpically grounded and proven ideas and practices from Practice, not just academic theory. STREAMS is not intended to be an academic exercise in the social science but theoretically-sound ideas and methods for practitioners in engineering enterprises.

much much more in source: STREAMS – STREAMS Wiki

Making Sense Of Complexity – Sarah Firth graphics on medium

Sarah Firth

Making Sense Of Complexity

Continues in source: Making Sense Of Complexity – Extra Newsfeed

FORMWELTen-Institute for renewing systemic research | Larnaca Conferences – 28 May, 10am, Larnaca

Research / News | 

Larnaca Conferences

  • Meeting in Larnaca, Cyprus on Monday 28 May.
  • Starting at 10 am local time.

The meeting is an ‘ideas creation’ and brainstorming event between System Thinkers of different backgrounds.


  • To discuss how a complex approach to science is needed in order to overcome some of today’s bottlenecks
  • To explore transdisciplinary synergies between experts, and establish a common position statement
  • To look for EU funding and/or consider a Start-up
  • To set up a Think Tank and discuss how to implement our thinking in practice


Information flowing in our modern complex social system (between human brains, brains to computer and computer to computer) creates new realities which have an immense impact on our society, biology and evolution as humans. A formal thematisation of systems thinking needs to be developed in order to avoid negative outcomes such as degenerative disease, conflict, lack of cooperation and bad communication.

The meeting will bring together expert system thinkers in areas such as language, communication, ageing, cognition, complex systems, resilience and mathematics.

An example where our thinking may be applied is neuro-resilience: “The inherent characteristics of the brain as a complex system, the long term and short-term adaptation strategies of the individuals, and finally the quality of management strategies of the collective and the embedded environment in steering individuals away from undesired brain’s health related outcomes such as depression, dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and other neurodegenerative diseases” (Shima Beigi).

The multiple, complex and overlapping network transactions in a virtual or a real environment need to be studied. Another example in this respect is PolySocial Reality (PoSR) which is a “conceptual model for the global interaction context within which people experience social interactions whether immediate or mediated by technology. PoSR defines relations across the aggregate of all the experienced ‘locations’ and ‘communications’ of and between all individual people, people/machines and machines/machines in multiple networks and/or locales at the same or different times. PoSR is based upon the core concept that dynamic relational structures emerge from the aggregate of multiplexed asynchronous or synchronous data creations of all individuals within the domain of networked, non-networked, and/or local experiences” (Fisher and Applin).

How can systems theory and research create significant differences in real systems and everybody’s daily life? How can a transdisciplinary systemic discourse become of value to people, politics, economy, ecology, global solutions and integrate direct feedback from real systems and people into the discussion? Questions like these culminate in the ongoing task of a systemic language and should lead to building an exchange platform for researchers to evolve with their research and the systems they analyze, and for laymen and normal people to be systemically integrated into the discussion thus being enabled to use research and systemic concepts to keep up with the complexity of globalization and to participate actively in scientific progress.

“Systemic thinking can change the world, but how? Through people who learn how to think systemically, who learn how to interact with each other systemically and through those people who learn to act as a system in the environment of other systems.”
Gitta and Ralf Peyn, FORMWELT developer

The discussion and exchange of ideas will continue over the course of the day. It is hoped that this meeting will become a trend-setting, yearly event.

Source: FORMWELTen-Institute for renewing systemic research | Larnaca Conferences

How To Be a Systems Thinker | – A Conversation With Mary Catherine Bateson

How To Be a Systems Thinker

Mary Catherine Bateson [4.13.18]

Until fairly recently, artificial intelligence didn’t learn. To create a machine that learns to think more efficiently was a big challenge. In the same sense, one of the things that I wonder about is how we’ll be able to teach a machine to know what it doesn’t know that it might need to know in order to address a particular issue productively and insightfully. This is a huge problem for human beings. It takes a while for us to learn to solve problems, and then it takes even longer for us to realize what we don’t know that we would need to know to solve a particular problem. 

How do you deal with ignorance? I don’t mean how do you shut ignorance out. Rather, how do you deal with an awareness of what you don’t know, and you don’t know how to know, in dealing with a particular problem? When Gregory Bateson was arguing about human purposes, that was where he got involved in environmentalism. We were doing all sorts of things to the planet we live on without even asking what the side effects would be and the interactions, although, at that point we were thinking more about side effects than about interactions between multiple processes. Once you begin to understand the nature of side effects, you ask a different set of questions before you make decisions and projections and analyze what’s going to happen.

MARY CATHERINE BATESON is a writer and cultural anthropologist. In 2004 she retired from her position as Clarence J. Robinson Professor in Anthropology and English at George Mason University, and is now Professor Emerita. Mary Catherine Bateson’s Edge Bio


At the moment, I’m asking myself how people think about complex wholes like the ecology of the planet, or the climate, or large populations of human beings that have evolved for many years in separate locations and are now re-integrating. To think about these things, I find that you need something like systems theory. So, I went back to thinking about systems theory two or three years ago, which I hadn’t for quite a long time.

…continues in source, and concludes rather wonderfully with:

The tragedy of the cybernetic revolution, which had two phases, the computer science side and the systems theory side, has been the neglect of the systems theory side of it. We chose marketable gadgets in preference to a deeper understanding of the world we live in.

Source: How To Be a Systems Thinker |

The Systems Studio newsletter 16 April 2018 – loads of events, links

alt_text Email alt_text Tweet alt_text Share
Hello from sunny San Francisco!

The Systems Sanctuary, our peer-learning program for systems leaders is well underway, and we are already hearing stories of the patience it takes to stick with systems change and just how alone people feel whether they’re in Nova Scotia, Auckland or London.

IFAC’s Committee meeting explored how technology is disrupting the accountancy profession and how this is shaping who gets hired. Accountants with coding skills are becoming hugely valuable commodities.

Tatiana and I continue to design  The Systems Sisterhood, a program of support for women of systems change who are in transition. We’ve had huge interest in this. We will let you know when applications are open.

Finally I am on the Advisory Committee for a very exciting gathering of systems change field builders, taking place at Wasan Island, Canada in June. We are hoping to apply our own tools to ourselves, to raise up the field of systems change globally.

Warm wishes,

Rachel Sinha, Founder, The Systems Studio




Have a story we should include in this newsletter? Get in touch
The Systems Studio exists to accelerate the evolution systems that allow humans and nature to flourish.
Our clients are trying to change professions, institutions and industries in service of people and planet.We do this by creating experiences where people can truly connect andstrategize about the things they really care about. Working with us always feels focused and fun.

We do three things:

Create community for systems leaders.
Craft and facilitate gatherings that change everything.
Teach strategy and leadership for systems change.

Get in touch


Source: Top Inspiration, Events and News on Systems Change 

The Thoughts of a Spiderweb | Quanta Magazine

The Thoughts of a Spiderweb

Spiders appear to offload cognitive tasks to their webs, making them one of a number of species with a mind that isn’t fully confined within the head.

Is a spiderweb part of the animal’s mind?

Millions of years ago, a few spiders abandoned the kind of round webs that the word “spiderweb” calls to mind and started to focus on a new strategy. Before, they would wait for prey to become ensnared in their webs and then walk out to retrieve it. Then they began building horizontal nets to use as a fishing platform. Now their modern descendants, the cobweb spiders, dangle sticky threads below, wait until insects walk by and get snagged, and reel their unlucky victims in.

In 2008, the researcher Hilton Japyassú prompted 12 species of orb spiders collected from all over Brazil to go through this transition again. He waited until the spiders wove an ordinary web. Then he snipped its threads so that the silk drooped to where crickets wandered below. When a cricket got hooked, not all the orb spiders could fully pull it up, as a cobweb spider does. But some could, and all at least began to reel it in with their two front legs.

continued in source: The Thoughts of a Spiderweb | Quanta Magazine

Keys to Unlocking Systems-Level Change – Susan Misra and Jamaica Maxwell (anticlickbait: systems mindset, tools, understanding of human dynamics)

Three Keys to Unlocking Systems-Level Change

Developing a systems mindset, identifying the right tool for the job, and paying attention to human dynamics can help leaders move from theory to action when facing complex social problems.

The first step to solving an intractable social problem is to understand the system in which it sits. If you don’t, you might find yourself investing in a solution that is ineffective, takes more time or resources to implement, or even makes a problem worse. To reduce the global incidence of HIV, for example, global health leaders must look beyond developing treatments for symptoms; they must address patients’ access to health services, and how culture, economics, and politics affects who benefits in the current system. Taking in the bigger picture—what many of us in the social sector call systems thinking—requires that we understand a system’s many stakeholders, how they interact, and what influences them. Systems thinking means understanding the web of interrelations that create complex problems and rethinking assumptions about how change happens.

This approach isn’t new. Much has been written on thinking systemicallyleading systemically, and collaborating systemically. Yet the social sector leaders and grantmakers who are actively integrating the tools and practices of systems thinking into their day-to-day work are few and far between.

So what does it take to move from theory to practice when working on systems?

The David & Lucile Packard Foundation and Management Assistance Group, a nonprofit that supports movement building, partnered together to answer this question. Given our organizations’ history of influencing systems and commitment to impact, we embarked on a project to understand and overcome the barriers to creating system-level change that grantmakers and others in the social sector face. We reviewed more than 175 websites, articles, books, and videos; conducted more than 30 interviews with systems experts and philanthropic leaders; and ultimately identified three ingredients necessary for overcoming common barriers and positively influencing systems:

1. A systems mindset

2. The right tool for the job

3. An understanding of human dynamics

Full details in source: Three Keys to Unlocking Systems-Level Change

compose new post
go to top
go to the next post or comment
go to the previous post or comment
toggle comment visibility
cancel edit post or comment