Updated rough draft systems | complexity | cybernetics reading list

See my post on LinkedIn (replicated below) and join the discussion there:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/antlerboy_rough-draft-systemscomplexitycybernetics-activity-7246779585235664896-64Xz

pdf: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/85zlt0t6ph8qarx7d7gic/2024-09-27-rough-draft-systems-thinking-reading-list-v1.1BT.pdf?rlkey=3rfavacsy4n6sl8j0pyedph1q&st=qagh1418&dl=0
Commentable Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Tt8GgQQj4Qw4HnR7DxKeF370o_HlDlpv/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=115526108239573817578&rtpof=true&sd=true

How do you get into systems | complexity | cybernetics?

Here’s my rough reading list.

There are a lot of answers to the question, many of them connecting with some kind of disjointing break from ‘normal’ ways of seeing and being. Anything from being bullied at school to being dyslexic. Being in an outsider group. Naively applying thinking from one domain to another. Studying a technical problem long enough to suddenly see it in a completely different light – then either have your breakthrough celebrated or rejected.

It isn’t some mystic thing and it doesn’t require to you break from polite society. But it is one of the richest, weirdest, most diverse and challenging, inspiring and confounding, confronting and validating things you can study.

I’m often asked for a reading list for people interested in the field, and I usually suck my teeth. Some of the books are engaging, insightful, humorous, relevant. Others are dry as old twigs but less likely to kindle a spark.

Really, it depends on you and your context – as David Ing says, it’s better to talk of the thinkers and their individual constellations of interests, history, learning, and personal tendencies than it is to talk of schools and fields and separate places.

And even presenting this reading list, I’d say that I’d recommend Terry Pratchett, Douglas Adams, Ursula K Le Guin, Italo Calvino, Jorge Luis Borges, Star Trek, old 20th Century Sci-Fi and Apartheid-era South African writing, art movies and music more – if you happen to be a bit like me. You’ll find your thing, if you’re interested.

But. The books are there – and many of them are *really good*. Top ones I’d recommend came out this decade

  • Hoverstadt’s Grammar of Systems
  • Jackson’s Critical Systems Thinking: A practitioner’s Guide
  • Opening the box – a slim little thing from SCiO colleagues
  • Essential Balances by Velitchkov

The attached list is a bit systems-practice focused. It is also too long and incomplete and partial simply for lack of time and energy.

There are *so many* flavours of systems thinking / complexity / cybernetics – do yourself a favour and don’t flog through stuff that doesn’t work for you, find things that bring your mind alive. Start with the articles and skim through.

But do start, because you will find in here the thinking and tools to find better ways of doing things for organisations, societies, the ecosystem, for people – and a lot of fun.

Tip: to save the pdf, hover over the image of the first page and find the rectangle bottom right – click that and it should go full screen. Top right you’ll have a download option, which when clicked will then resolve into a download button… (which might then open in your browser, but at least as a proper pdf you can save).

So… deep breath… what would you recommend? What do you think is missing?

#systems-thinking

Still Out of Control – Kelly (2026)

h/t Arthur Battram

Still Out of Control
KEVIN KELLY
JUN 08, 2026



Eventually Out of Control was translated into a few other languages.
I published Out of Control 32 years ago (1994). I started writing it in 1989, which is a long time in the past for a book that promises to talk about the future. A lot in our world has changed in that time, including our attitudes about the future. Far too much has happened in the world of technology to be summed up in this note. But it is fair to wonder: how well has my book held up for the past 32 years? Is Out of Control still valid? Is it worth reading today? And what might I have written differently given what I know today? What, if anything, would I change?

Still Out of Control – by Kevin Kelly – KK
https://kevinkelly.substack.com/p/still-out-of-control

The practice of complexity – Mowles (2026)

The practice of complexity
Talking, theorising and practicing at the Complexity and Management Conference June ’26
CHRIS MOWLES
JUN 10, 2026
This year’s Complexity and Management Conference was entitled What does it mean to say the world is complex? Implications for practice. Jean Boulton kicked us off with a rich key note which grounded us in the complexity sciences and made the case for complex ontology – reality is complex.

For the rest of the day delegates discussed the implications of Jean’s presentation for their work, and some also hosted workshops of their own to convene discussions about their practice which might be of interest to others. These included Migena Shula, Kevin Flinn, Eric Wenzel, Sara Filbee, Jakub Perlak, Jana Filosof, and Franciska Fellegi.





As a reflection on the work on Saturday I gave a response on Sunday morning which was not in any way intended as a summing up, but a further opportunity for a reflexive turn on some of the themes which had emerged. It was also an opportunity to talk about, and to model, what the perspective of perspectives we refer to as complex responsive processes of relating has developed by way of practices to do justice to the insight that the social world is complex all the way down. This is in no way an attempt to claim a monopoly on the truth, but to demonstrate what 30 years of working with complexity ideas has meant for practice, the theme of the conference.

The practice of complexity – by Chris Mowles
https://chrismowles.substack.com/p/the-practice-of-complexity?r=1queb6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true

Rodrigo Nunes on Ecologies of Organization and Democratic Transformation — Future Histories International

Rodrigo Nunes on Ecologies of Organization and Democratic Transformation — Future Histories International https://www.futurehistories-international.com/episodes/s04/e03-rodrigo-nunes-on-ecologies-of-organization-and-democratic-transformation/

SRBS 2026

How might #SystemsThinking education be authentically redesigned? #WendyGregory + #GeraldMidgley reflect on history of MA Management Systems 1992-2003 at uniofhull.bsky.social “Emergent Innovation in Systemic Programme Design”, SRBS 2026, doi.org/10.1002/sres…

How might #SystemsThinking education be authentically redesigned? #WendyGregory + #GeraldMidgley reflect on history of MA Management Systems 1992-2003 at uniofhull.bsky.social "Emergent Innovation in Systemic Programme Design", SRBS 2026, doi.org/10.1002/sres… open access early view

David Ing (@daviding.com) 2026-06-07T17:20:38.089Z

Evaluation is Never Neutral or Independent: Reflections on Valuing, Complexity and Systems Thinking

Evaluation is Never Neutral or Independent: Reflections on Valuing, Complexity and Systems Thinking https://thesystemsthinkingapprentice.substack.com/p/evaluation-is-never-neutral-or-independent?r=81ic5y&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true

The Lost history of Cybernetics. General Intellect Unit.

June and Kyle from the General intellect Unit podcast join Mia to explain what cybernetics is, its history in the Chilean revolution, and how we can use it to build a better socialist world.
https://www.iheart.com/podcast/105-it-could-happen-here-30717896/episode/the-lost-history-of-cybernetics-92769653/

After Chile: A Second Chance for a Technological Revolution in Latin America – Ben Wood (2026) on LinkedIn on the story, and Víctor Ganón’s Metaphorum webinar (link to video included)

After Chile: A Second Chance for a Technological Revolution in Latin America

Ben Wood, PMP
Project Consultant | Builder | Systems Thinker


June 5, 2026
On September 11, 1973, fighter jets bombed the presidential palace in Santiago. By the end of the day, President Salvador Allende was dead, and the future Stafford Beer had been helping to build for Chile appeared to die with him.

Project Cybersyn was over, and Beer’s dream that cybernetics might help humanity govern itself with greater intelligence, freedom, and dignity appeared destined for the dustbin of history.

Following Chile, Beer withdrew from public life and disappeared into the mountains of Wales for the next twelve years.

Until a letter arrived from Uruguay, from a man named Victor Ganón.

“Our country would like to offer you a second chance in Latin America to implement your ideas and establish a real-time control system for Uruguay. Would you accept it?”

Beer wrote back immediately:

“I have been waiting for 12 years for just such a letter…There is only one possible answer: YES!”


Links:

Metaphorum Webinar:

https://youtu.be/CvVXpD4w5zw?si=8JStPSBmo4B6gEwe

Victor’s book:

https://books.apple.com/au/book/urucib-uruguay-cibernetico-successfully-implementing/id6746205803

Victor’s Article:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-021-01351-5

After Chile: A Second Chance for a Technological Revolution in Latin America | LinkedIn

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/after-chile-second-chance-technological-revolution-latin-wood-pmp-xoc7e

RIP Edgar Morin

RIP Edgar Morin

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/obituaries/article/2026/05/30/french-sociologist-philosopher-and-intellectual-provocateur-edgar-morin-has-died-aged-104_6753967_15.html

https://festival-avignon.com/en/news/tribute-to-edgar-morin-1921%E2%80%932026-356521

https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-pays-tribute-legacy-edgar-morin

https://www.euronews.com/culture/2026/05/30/edgar-morin-frances-intellectual-grandfather-dies-aged-104

https://en.cibercuba.com/noticias/2026-05-31-u1-e209395-s27061-nid330753-fallecio-104-anos-edgar-morin-sabio-humanista

https://www.voiceofemirates.com/en/society/2026/05/30/french-philosopher-edgar-morin-dies-at-the-age-of-104

RIP Jim Rutt (with John Krakauer on Why Neuroscience Needs Behavior and Tyson Yunkaporta on Ceremony, Skepticism, and Seeing in 3D)

Very sad to hear the news this morning that Jim Rutt died on May 27, 2026. Official announcement:

https://www.obaughfuneralhome.com/obituaries/james-jim-rutt

He was a big character and someone deeply involved with complexity, a Boomer Uncle or Grand-uncle par excellence, I think, and someone I listened to regularly with amusement and frustration – but a true, actual, explorer and thinker, open to challenge and deeply learning focused. Just yesterday I’d listened to and sent myself the link for this excellenct interview with John Krakauer, which aligns with so much of my thinking on neuroscience:

https://jimrutt.substack.com/p/ep-339-john-krakauer-on-why-neuroscience

And then I was pleased to see that his final published podcast was with Tyson Yunkaporta, his opposite in many ways – yet also someone with many similarities, finding commonality, who pays umprompted and heartfelt tribute to what he has learned from Jim, and which is openly reciprocated, and explored:

https://jimrutt.substack.com/p/ep-345-worldviews-tyson-yunkaporta

ChatGPT says I should summarise his life as:

“Jim Rutt occupied a rare position at the intersection of technology, complexity science and public discourse. As chairman of the Santa Fe Institute, an internet entrepreneur, co-founder of Game B, and host of The Jim Rutt Show, he spent decades creating conversations across disciplines and communities that otherwise might never have met. His enduring contribution wasn’t a single theory or institution but a relentless curiosity about how complex systems evolve and how humans might learn to navigate them more wisely.”

That’s pretty good actually, he was big and bold but also humble, a capitalist but also a convenor, a complexity thinker but always critical. Other links:

Longer biography

https://archania.org/p/individuals/internet-personalities/jim-rutt

Full backlog of his podcast

https://www.jimruttshow.com

And his substack

https://jimrutt.substack.com/notes

And a recent interview with him:

https://blog.thomas.cr/p/the-next-10000-years-a-roadmap-for?hide_intro_popup=true

A typical bombacious perspective, and responses

A tribute from Jonathan Rowson

https://jonathanrowson.substack.com/p/howdy-on-the-other-side

And I’ll leave the last word to Jim

Problematique Dialogue 2026 retrospective – Ing (2026)

May 29, 2026 daviding

Problematique Dialogue 2026 retrospective – Coevolving Innovations

Icon, Likeness, Likely Story, Likelihood, Probability • 3

Re: Peirce ListPhyllis Chiasson

A more complete excerpt and the translator’s notes are very helpful here.

A probability (εικος) is not the same as a sign (σηµειον).  The former is a generally accepted premiss ;  for that which people know to happen or not to happen, or to be or not to be, usually in a particular way, is a probability :  e.g., that the envious are malevolent or that those who are loved are affectionate.  A sign, however, means a demonstrative premiss which is necessary or generally accepted.1  That which coexists with something else, or before or after whose happening something else has happened, is a sign of that something’s having happened or being.

An enthymeme is a syllogism from probabilities or signs ;  and a sign can be taken in three ways — in just as many ways as there are of taking the middle term in the several figures :  either as in the first figure or as in the second or as in the third.

  • E.g., the proof that a woman is pregnant because she has milk is by the first figure ;  for the middle term is ‘having milk’.  A stands for ‘pregnant’, B for ‘having milk’, and C for ‘woman’.
  • The proof that the wise are good because Pittacus was good is by the third figure.  A stands for ‘good’, B for ‘the wise’, and C for Pittacus.  Then it is true to predicate both A and B of C ;  only we do not state the latter, because we know it, whereas we formally assume the former.
  • The proof that a woman is pregnant because she is sallow is intended to be by the middle figure ;  for since sallowness is a characteristic of woman in pregnancy, and is associated with this particular woman, they suppose that she is proved to be pregnant.  A stands for ‘sallowness’, B for ‘being pregnant’, C for ‘woman’.

If only one premiss is stated, we get only a sign ;  but if the other premiss is assumed as well, we get a syllogism,2 e.g., that Pittacus is high-minded, because those who love honour are high-minded, and Pittacus loves honour ;  or again that the wise are good, because Pittacus is good and also wise.

In this way syllogisms can be effected ;  but whereas a syllogism in the first figure cannot be refuted if it is true, since it is universal, a syllogism in the last figure can be refuted even if the conclusion is true, because the syllogism is neither universal nor relevant to our purpose.3  For if Pittacus is good, it is not necessary for this reason that all other wise men are good.  A syllogism in the middle figure is always and in every way refutable, since we never get a syllogism with the terms in this relation4 ;  for it does not necessarily follow, if a pregnant woman is sallow, and this woman is sallow, that she is pregnant.  Thus truth can be found in all signs, but they differ in the ways which have been described.

We must either classify signs in this way, and regard their middle term as an index (τεκµηριον)5 (for the name ‘index’ is given to that which causes us to know, and the middle term is especially of this nature), or describe the arguments drawn from the extremes6 as ‘signs’, and that which is drawn from the middle as an ‘index’.  For the conclusion which is reached through the first figure is most generally accepted and most true.  (Aristotle, Prior Analytics 2.27, 70a3–70b6).

Translator’s Notes

  1. If referable to one phenomenon only, a sign has objective necessity ;  if to more than one, its value is a matter of opinion.
  2. Strictly an enthymeme.
  3. If the signs of an enthymeme in the first figure are true, the conclusion is inevitable.  Aristotle does not mean that the conclusion is universal, but that the universality of the major premiss implies the validity of the minor and conclusion.  The example (<all> those who have honour, etc.) quoted for the third figure contains no universal premiss or sign, and fails to establish a universal conclusion.
  4. i.e. when both premisses are affirmative.
  5. Signs may be classified as irrefutable (1st figure) and refutable (2nd and 3rd figures), and the name ‘index’ may be attached to their middle terms, either in all figures or (more probably) only in the first, where the middle is distinctively middle.
  6. Alternatively the name ‘sign’ may be restricted to the 2nd and 3rd figures, and may be replaced by ‘index’ in the first.

Reference

  • Aristotle, “Prior Analytics”, Hugh Tredennick (trans.), pp. 181–531 in Aristotle, Volume 1, Loeb Classical Library, William Heinemann, London, UK, 1938.

Resource

cc: Academia.eduCyberneticsLaws of FormMathstodon
cc: Research GateStructural ModelingSystems ScienceSyscoi

#analogy, #aristotle, #c-s-peirce, #icon-index-symbol, #induction, #inquiry, #likelihood, #likely-story, #likeness, #logic, #mathematics, #probability, #probable-reasoning, #semiotics, #sign-relations

Bet hedging (biology)

Shared by https://x.com/male_leo_xxvi in a cybernetics chat

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bet_hedging_(biology)

Why we don’t get complexity: Stafford Beer, ‘requisite variety’ and systems thinking

Why we don’t get complexity: Stafford Beer, ‘requisite variety’ and systems thinking. Claire Hartnell. https://open.substack.com/pub/clairejhartnell/p/why-we-dont-get-complexity-stafford?r=slo6&utm_medium=ios

Machine Intelligence is not Artificial – Part 7

Machine Intelligence is not Artificial – Part 7. Sean Manion. https://seanmanion.substack.com/p/machine-intelligence-is-not-artificial-d42?r=slo6&utm_medium=ios&triedRedirect=true

HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article. Front. Syst. Neurosci., 24 March 2022

HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article
Front. Syst. Neurosci., 24 March 2022

Volume 16 – 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2022.768201

Technological Approach to Mind Everywhere: An Experimentally-Grounded Framework for Understanding Diverse Bodies and Minds

Michael Levin 1,2*

1. Allen Discovery Center at Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States

2. Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States

Abstract
Synthetic biology and bioengineering provide the opportunity to create novel embodied cognitive systems (otherwise known as minds) in a very wide variety of chimeric architectures combining evolved and designed material and software. These advances are disrupting familiar concepts in the philosophy of mind, and require new ways of thinking about and comparing truly diverse intelligences, whose composition and origin are not like any of the available natural model species. In this Perspective, I introduce TAME—Technological Approach to Mind Everywhere—a framework for understanding and manipulating cognition in unconventional substrates. TAME formalizes a non-binary (continuous), empirically-based approach to strongly embodied agency. TAME provides a natural way to think about animal sentience as an instance of collective intelligence of cell groups, arising from dynamics that manifest in similar ways in numerous other substrates. When applied to regenerating/developmental systems, TAME suggests a perspective on morphogenesis as an example of basal cognition. The deep symmetry between problem-solving in anatomical, physiological, transcriptional, and 3D (traditional behavioral) spaces drives specific hypotheses by which cognitive capacities can increase during evolution. An important medium exploited by evolution for joining active subunits into greater agents is developmental bioelectricity, implemented by pre-neural use of ion channels and gap junctions to scale up cell-level feedback loops into anatomical homeostasis. This architecture of multi-scale competency of biological systems has important implications for plasticity of bodies and minds, greatly potentiating evolvability. Considering classical and recent data from the perspectives of computational science, evolutionary biology, and basal cognition, reveals a rich research program with many implications for cognitive science, evolutionary biology, regenerative medicine, and artificial intelligence.
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/systems-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2022.768201/full