Updated rough draft systems | complexity | cybernetics reading list

See my post on LinkedIn (replicated below) and join the discussion there:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/antlerboy_rough-draft-systemscomplexitycybernetics-activity-7246779585235664896-64Xz

pdf: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/85zlt0t6ph8qarx7d7gic/2024-09-27-rough-draft-systems-thinking-reading-list-v1.1BT.pdf?rlkey=3rfavacsy4n6sl8j0pyedph1q&st=qagh1418&dl=0
Commentable Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Tt8GgQQj4Qw4HnR7DxKeF370o_HlDlpv/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=115526108239573817578&rtpof=true&sd=true

How do you get into systems | complexity | cybernetics?

Here’s my rough reading list.

There are a lot of answers to the question, many of them connecting with some kind of disjointing break from ‘normal’ ways of seeing and being. Anything from being bullied at school to being dyslexic. Being in an outsider group. Naively applying thinking from one domain to another. Studying a technical problem long enough to suddenly see it in a completely different light – then either have your breakthrough celebrated or rejected.

It isn’t some mystic thing and it doesn’t require to you break from polite society. But it is one of the richest, weirdest, most diverse and challenging, inspiring and confounding, confronting and validating things you can study.

I’m often asked for a reading list for people interested in the field, and I usually suck my teeth. Some of the books are engaging, insightful, humorous, relevant. Others are dry as old twigs but less likely to kindle a spark.

Really, it depends on you and your context – as David Ing says, it’s better to talk of the thinkers and their individual constellations of interests, history, learning, and personal tendencies than it is to talk of schools and fields and separate places.

And even presenting this reading list, I’d say that I’d recommend Terry Pratchett, Douglas Adams, Ursula K Le Guin, Italo Calvino, Jorge Luis Borges, Star Trek, old 20th Century Sci-Fi and Apartheid-era South African writing, art movies and music more – if you happen to be a bit like me. You’ll find your thing, if you’re interested.

But. The books are there – and many of them are *really good*. Top ones I’d recommend came out this decade

  • Hoverstadt’s Grammar of Systems
  • Jackson’s Critical Systems Thinking: A practitioner’s Guide
  • Opening the box – a slim little thing from SCiO colleagues
  • Essential Balances by Velitchkov

The attached list is a bit systems-practice focused. It is also too long and incomplete and partial simply for lack of time and energy.

There are *so many* flavours of systems thinking / complexity / cybernetics – do yourself a favour and don’t flog through stuff that doesn’t work for you, find things that bring your mind alive. Start with the articles and skim through.

But do start, because you will find in here the thinking and tools to find better ways of doing things for organisations, societies, the ecosystem, for people – and a lot of fun.

Tip: to save the pdf, hover over the image of the first page and find the rectangle bottom right – click that and it should go full screen. Top right you’ll have a download option, which when clicked will then resolve into a download button… (which might then open in your browser, but at least as a proper pdf you can save).

So… deep breath… what would you recommend? What do you think is missing?

#systems-thinking

Icon, Likeness, Likely Story, Likelihood, Probability • 4

Re: Icon, Likeness, Likely Story, Likelihood, Probability • 3
Re: Laws of FormLyle Anderson

Lyle,

We are here engaged in the wider context of which Peirce’s systems of graphs for propositional logic and Spencer Brown’s calculus of indications constitute a prominent corner, one might even say a “cantonical field”, but still just one corner of the larger picture, abstractly syntactic and formally deductive in character.

Over and above that niche the overarching edifice of Peirce’s Logic of Science, supported by the theory of signs and the theory of inquiry, must cover all three forms of inference — abductive, inductive, deductive — plus the bridge from qualitative logic to quantitative statistics.  That is the architecture of inquiry with which we’ll be occupied for quite some time.

Continuing from where I left off last time —

What intrigues me about the recently cited passages from Aristotle is the way he uses what we now regard as semiotic terms — icon, index, sign — to describe the elements and structures of logical syllogisms, including the modes of non‑demonstrative inference.

The roles of signs informing sign relations and the rules of inference guiding inquiries are subjects Peirce explored in depth.  Especially in the early years the subjects of signs and inquiry are so entwined in Peirce’s relevant lectures and papers that he passes from one to the other with little sense of discontinuity between the two.

Over the years, both in Peirce’s work and the community of researchers following after, there develops such an intense focus on the problem of classifying signs that the theory of signs takes on the character of a separate subject, detached from its natural connection to the theory of inquiry.

One of our tasks is to heal that rift and regain a sense of the original common root.

Resource

cc: Academia.eduCyberneticsLaws of FormMathstodon
cc: Research GateStructural ModelingSystems ScienceSyscoi

#analogy, #aristotle, #c-s-peirce, #icon-index-symbol, #induction, #inquiry, #likelihood, #likely-story, #likeness, #logic, #mathematics, #probability, #probable-reasoning, #semiotics, #sign-relations

Cybernetics, In Our Time – Tuddenham (2026)

Peter Tuddenham

Jun 13, 2026

The United Kingdom’s BBC Radio 4 gave the field forty-five minutes at peak listening time. Members of the Cybernetics Society gathered on Zoom meetings afterwards to share reactions, reflections, and look to the future and the activities of the Cybernetics Society.

https://petertuddenham.substack.com/p/cybernetics-in-our-time

Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change – Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Special Themed Issue: Presencing the Futures of Democracy and Governance

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47061/jasc.v6i1

Published: 2026-05-31

Full Issue

Editorial

Commentary from the Field

Invited Article

Original Articles (Peer-Reviewed)

Book Review

Innovations in Praxis

In Dialogue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Special Themed Issue: Presencing the Futures of Democracy and Governance

Cover Image: © 2026 Zaka Permana, Blooming Horizon, iPad using Procreate.

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Special Themed Issue: Presencing the Futures of Democracy and Governance | Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change
https://jabsc.org/index.php/jabsc/issue/view/804

Derech Hashem (The Way of God), written around 1736 by Rabbi Moshe Chaim Luzzatto (RaMCHaL), Sefaria Edition 2019, Translated by Rabbi Francis Nataf

This https://stream.syscoi.com/2024/05/27/tracing-the-roots-brief-history-of-systems-thinking-2024/ was reshared on LinkedIn, drawing the comment

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7470429570618355712/?dashCommentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Afsd_comment%3A%287470819985020444672%2Curn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7470429570618355712%29

Adail Retamal

CSEP Systems/Software Engineering – Improving the world through better systems

In the Introduction of the book “Derech Hashem” (The Way of God), written around 1736 by Rabbi Moshe Chaim Luzzatto (RaMCHaL), there is a very concise and clear explanation of Systems Thinking, to prepare the readers for what they are about to experience. It is a masterpiece!

https://www.sefaria.org/Derekh_Hashem?tab=contents

The first long paragraph of which – translated on that page from the Hebrew by Rabbi Franci Nataf, reads:


The advantage of knowing things within the framework of their parts – according to their divisions and the structures of their relationships – over their knowledge without distinction is like the advantage of seeing a garden beautified by its flowerbeds, enhanced by its paths and planted in specific rows, over seeing a thicket of reeds or a forest growing mixed together. For in truth, the perception of many parts about which we do not know their connections or true places in the structure of all that is constructed by them is nothing but a heavy and joyless burden to the intellect that desires to understand [it]. The intellect wearies itself with it; it toils, despairs, tires and has no pleasure; as it will not quench its desire to come to the purpose of any [part] that one has come to consider. For this will not come to him, since he is missing its complete context. As a great part of something is surely its relationships to those things that relate to it, and its place within its context – and this is lacking from him. So it comes out that his desire is his unresolvable burden; and his longing is his unassuageable pain. Not so is the one who knows something in its context. When he examines it, it is clearly revealed in his eyes as it [actually] is. He grows in his understanding of that to which he turns and he enjoys the beauty of his work and is exhilarated. And, in general, that which one needs to examine about his subject is [the knowledge of] its true place that we mentioned. And that is because when we surely examine all things – physical and conceptual, which is all that can be grasped by our intellects – it comes out that they are not all of one type or one function, but rather of different types and differing functions. And according to the difference in their types, so will their properties and axioms differ. And this is what compels us to distinguish between them with our intellects, so that we may truly understand them – each one according to its axioms. However the first [step in knowledge] of the types and functions is one. And that is to know to which one of them the subject belongs, meaning to the part or the whole, to the specific or the category, to the cause or the effect, to the subject or its associations. And this is what is required to know about a subject first: Is it the whole thing or a part, a category or a specific, is it a cause or an effect, is it the [actual] subject or an association?

https://www.sefaria.org/Derekh_Hashem%2C_Introduction.2?lang=bi&with=all&lang2=en

Love & Philosophy podcast: Punk, Tech & Care: B. Scot Rousse on Being Human in the AI Age

[Essential listening:]

with Hubert Dreyfus, Fernando Flores, Heidegger, and Kierkegaard

Love and PhilosophyB. Scot Rousse, and Andrea Hiott

Apr 27, 2026

https://loveandphilosophy.com/beyond-dichotomy-podcast/punk-tech-care-b-scot-rousse-being-human-in-the-ai-age

https://withoutwhy.substack.com/p/punk-tech-and-care-my-conversation

Still Out of Control – Kelly (2026)

h/t Arthur Battram

Still Out of Control
KEVIN KELLY
JUN 08, 2026



Eventually Out of Control was translated into a few other languages.
I published Out of Control 32 years ago (1994). I started writing it in 1989, which is a long time in the past for a book that promises to talk about the future. A lot in our world has changed in that time, including our attitudes about the future. Far too much has happened in the world of technology to be summed up in this note. But it is fair to wonder: how well has my book held up for the past 32 years? Is Out of Control still valid? Is it worth reading today? And what might I have written differently given what I know today? What, if anything, would I change?

Still Out of Control – by Kevin Kelly – KK
https://kevinkelly.substack.com/p/still-out-of-control

The practice of complexity – Mowles (2026)

The practice of complexity
Talking, theorising and practicing at the Complexity and Management Conference June ’26
CHRIS MOWLES
JUN 10, 2026
This year’s Complexity and Management Conference was entitled What does it mean to say the world is complex? Implications for practice. Jean Boulton kicked us off with a rich key note which grounded us in the complexity sciences and made the case for complex ontology – reality is complex.

For the rest of the day delegates discussed the implications of Jean’s presentation for their work, and some also hosted workshops of their own to convene discussions about their practice which might be of interest to others. These included Migena Shula, Kevin Flinn, Eric Wenzel, Sara Filbee, Jakub Perlak, Jana Filosof, and Franciska Fellegi.





As a reflection on the work on Saturday I gave a response on Sunday morning which was not in any way intended as a summing up, but a further opportunity for a reflexive turn on some of the themes which had emerged. It was also an opportunity to talk about, and to model, what the perspective of perspectives we refer to as complex responsive processes of relating has developed by way of practices to do justice to the insight that the social world is complex all the way down. This is in no way an attempt to claim a monopoly on the truth, but to demonstrate what 30 years of working with complexity ideas has meant for practice, the theme of the conference.

The practice of complexity – by Chris Mowles
https://chrismowles.substack.com/p/the-practice-of-complexity?r=1queb6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true

Rodrigo Nunes on Ecologies of Organization and Democratic Transformation — Future Histories International

Rodrigo Nunes on Ecologies of Organization and Democratic Transformation — Future Histories International https://www.futurehistories-international.com/episodes/s04/e03-rodrigo-nunes-on-ecologies-of-organization-and-democratic-transformation/

SRBS 2026

How might #SystemsThinking education be authentically redesigned? #WendyGregory + #GeraldMidgley reflect on history of MA Management Systems 1992-2003 at uniofhull.bsky.social “Emergent Innovation in Systemic Programme Design”, SRBS 2026, doi.org/10.1002/sres…

How might #SystemsThinking education be authentically redesigned? #WendyGregory + #GeraldMidgley reflect on history of MA Management Systems 1992-2003 at uniofhull.bsky.social "Emergent Innovation in Systemic Programme Design", SRBS 2026, doi.org/10.1002/sres… open access early view

David Ing (@daviding.com) 2026-06-07T17:20:38.089Z

Evaluation is Never Neutral or Independent: Reflections on Valuing, Complexity and Systems Thinking

Evaluation is Never Neutral or Independent: Reflections on Valuing, Complexity and Systems Thinking https://thesystemsthinkingapprentice.substack.com/p/evaluation-is-never-neutral-or-independent?r=81ic5y&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true

The Lost history of Cybernetics. General Intellect Unit.

June and Kyle from the General intellect Unit podcast join Mia to explain what cybernetics is, its history in the Chilean revolution, and how we can use it to build a better socialist world.
https://www.iheart.com/podcast/105-it-could-happen-here-30717896/episode/the-lost-history-of-cybernetics-92769653/

After Chile: A Second Chance for a Technological Revolution in Latin America – Ben Wood (2026) on LinkedIn on the story, and Víctor Ganón’s Metaphorum webinar (link to video included)

After Chile: A Second Chance for a Technological Revolution in Latin America

Ben Wood, PMP
Project Consultant | Builder | Systems Thinker


June 5, 2026
On September 11, 1973, fighter jets bombed the presidential palace in Santiago. By the end of the day, President Salvador Allende was dead, and the future Stafford Beer had been helping to build for Chile appeared to die with him.

Project Cybersyn was over, and Beer’s dream that cybernetics might help humanity govern itself with greater intelligence, freedom, and dignity appeared destined for the dustbin of history.

Following Chile, Beer withdrew from public life and disappeared into the mountains of Wales for the next twelve years.

Until a letter arrived from Uruguay, from a man named Victor Ganón.

“Our country would like to offer you a second chance in Latin America to implement your ideas and establish a real-time control system for Uruguay. Would you accept it?”

Beer wrote back immediately:

“I have been waiting for 12 years for just such a letter…There is only one possible answer: YES!”


Links:

Metaphorum Webinar:

https://youtu.be/CvVXpD4w5zw?si=8JStPSBmo4B6gEwe

Victor’s book:

https://books.apple.com/au/book/urucib-uruguay-cibernetico-successfully-implementing/id6746205803

Victor’s Article:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-021-01351-5

After Chile: A Second Chance for a Technological Revolution in Latin America | LinkedIn

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/after-chile-second-chance-technological-revolution-latin-wood-pmp-xoc7e

RIP Edgar Morin

RIP Edgar Morin

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/obituaries/article/2026/05/30/french-sociologist-philosopher-and-intellectual-provocateur-edgar-morin-has-died-aged-104_6753967_15.html

https://festival-avignon.com/en/news/tribute-to-edgar-morin-1921%E2%80%932026-356521

https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-pays-tribute-legacy-edgar-morin

https://www.euronews.com/culture/2026/05/30/edgar-morin-frances-intellectual-grandfather-dies-aged-104

https://en.cibercuba.com/noticias/2026-05-31-u1-e209395-s27061-nid330753-fallecio-104-anos-edgar-morin-sabio-humanista

https://www.voiceofemirates.com/en/society/2026/05/30/french-philosopher-edgar-morin-dies-at-the-age-of-104

RIP Jim Rutt (with John Krakauer on Why Neuroscience Needs Behavior and Tyson Yunkaporta on Ceremony, Skepticism, and Seeing in 3D)

Very sad to hear the news this morning that Jim Rutt died on May 27, 2026. Official announcement:

https://www.obaughfuneralhome.com/obituaries/james-jim-rutt

He was a big character and someone deeply involved with complexity, a Boomer Uncle or Grand-uncle par excellence, I think, and someone I listened to regularly with amusement and frustration – but a true, actual, explorer and thinker, open to challenge and deeply learning focused. Just yesterday I’d listened to and sent myself the link for this excellenct interview with John Krakauer, which aligns with so much of my thinking on neuroscience:

https://jimrutt.substack.com/p/ep-339-john-krakauer-on-why-neuroscience

And then I was pleased to see that his final published podcast was with Tyson Yunkaporta, his opposite in many ways – yet also someone with many similarities, finding commonality, who pays umprompted and heartfelt tribute to what he has learned from Jim, and which is openly reciprocated, and explored:

https://jimrutt.substack.com/p/ep-345-worldviews-tyson-yunkaporta

ChatGPT says I should summarise his life as:

“Jim Rutt occupied a rare position at the intersection of technology, complexity science and public discourse. As chairman of the Santa Fe Institute, an internet entrepreneur, co-founder of Game B, and host of The Jim Rutt Show, he spent decades creating conversations across disciplines and communities that otherwise might never have met. His enduring contribution wasn’t a single theory or institution but a relentless curiosity about how complex systems evolve and how humans might learn to navigate them more wisely.”

That’s pretty good actually, he was big and bold but also humble, a capitalist but also a convenor, a complexity thinker but always critical. Other links:

Longer biography

https://archania.org/p/individuals/internet-personalities/jim-rutt

Full backlog of his podcast

https://www.jimruttshow.com

And his substack

https://jimrutt.substack.com/notes

And a recent interview with him:

https://blog.thomas.cr/p/the-next-10000-years-a-roadmap-for?hide_intro_popup=true

A typical bombacious perspective, and responses

A tribute from Jonathan Rowson

https://jonathanrowson.substack.com/p/howdy-on-the-other-side

And I’ll leave the last word to Jim

Problematique Dialogue 2026 retrospective – Ing (2026)

May 29, 2026 daviding

Problematique Dialogue 2026 retrospective – Coevolving Innovations