Updated rough draft systems | complexity | cybernetics reading list

See my post on LinkedIn (replicated below) and join the discussion there:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/antlerboy_rough-draft-systemscomplexitycybernetics-activity-7246779585235664896-64Xz

pdf: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/85zlt0t6ph8qarx7d7gic/2024-09-27-rough-draft-systems-thinking-reading-list-v1.1BT.pdf?rlkey=3rfavacsy4n6sl8j0pyedph1q&st=qagh1418&dl=0
Commentable Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Tt8GgQQj4Qw4HnR7DxKeF370o_HlDlpv/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=115526108239573817578&rtpof=true&sd=true

How do you get into systems | complexity | cybernetics?

Here’s my rough reading list.

There are a lot of answers to the question, many of them connecting with some kind of disjointing break from ‘normal’ ways of seeing and being. Anything from being bullied at school to being dyslexic. Being in an outsider group. Naively applying thinking from one domain to another. Studying a technical problem long enough to suddenly see it in a completely different light – then either have your breakthrough celebrated or rejected.

It isn’t some mystic thing and it doesn’t require to you break from polite society. But it is one of the richest, weirdest, most diverse and challenging, inspiring and confounding, confronting and validating things you can study.

I’m often asked for a reading list for people interested in the field, and I usually suck my teeth. Some of the books are engaging, insightful, humorous, relevant. Others are dry as old twigs but less likely to kindle a spark.

Really, it depends on you and your context – as David Ing says, it’s better to talk of the thinkers and their individual constellations of interests, history, learning, and personal tendencies than it is to talk of schools and fields and separate places.

And even presenting this reading list, I’d say that I’d recommend Terry Pratchett, Douglas Adams, Ursula K Le Guin, Italo Calvino, Jorge Luis Borges, Star Trek, old 20th Century Sci-Fi and Apartheid-era South African writing, art movies and music more – if you happen to be a bit like me. You’ll find your thing, if you’re interested.

But. The books are there – and many of them are *really good*. Top ones I’d recommend came out this decade

  • Hoverstadt’s Grammar of Systems
  • Jackson’s Critical Systems Thinking: A practitioner’s Guide
  • Opening the box – a slim little thing from SCiO colleagues
  • Essential Balances by Velitchkov

The attached list is a bit systems-practice focused. It is also too long and incomplete and partial simply for lack of time and energy.

There are *so many* flavours of systems thinking / complexity / cybernetics – do yourself a favour and don’t flog through stuff that doesn’t work for you, find things that bring your mind alive. Start with the articles and skim through.

But do start, because you will find in here the thinking and tools to find better ways of doing things for organisations, societies, the ecosystem, for people – and a lot of fun.

Tip: to save the pdf, hover over the image of the first page and find the rectangle bottom right – click that and it should go full screen. Top right you’ll have a download option, which when clicked will then resolve into a download button… (which might then open in your browser, but at least as a proper pdf you can save).

So… deep breath… what would you recommend? What do you think is missing?

#systems-thinking

Information = Comprehension × Extension • Preamble

Perhaps the best perspective from which to bring the connection between the theory of signs and the theory of inquiry into its proper focus is Peirce’s own Theory of Information, which he began setting forth in lectures at Harvard and the Lowell Institute in 1865 and 1866.  Peirce encapsulates the elements of his theory in the following formula.

Information = Comprehension × Extension

In the Resources below I link to my study of Peirce’s 1865–1866 Lectures on the Logic of Science, with selections from the lectures and my commentary on them.

Ten summers ago I hit on what struck me as a new insight into one of the most recalcitrant problems in Peirce’s semiotics and logic of science, namely, the relation between “the manner in which different representations stand for their objects” and the way in which different inferences transform states of information.  I roughed out a sketch of my epiphany in a series of blog posts then set it aside for the cool of later reflection.  Now looks to be a choice moment for taking another look.

A first pass through the variations of representation and reasoning detects the axes of iconic, indexical, and symbolic manners of representation on the one hand and the axes of abductive, inductive, and deductive modes of inference on the other.  Early and often Peirce suggests a natural correspondence between the main modes of inference and the main manners of representation but his early arguments differ from his later accounts in ways deserving close examination, partly for the extra points in his line of reasoning and partly for his explanation of indices as signs constituted by convening the variant conceptions of sundry interpreters.

References

  • Peirce, C.S. (1866), “The Logic of Science, or, Induction and Hypothesis”, Lowell Lectures of 1866, pp. 357–504 in Writings of Charles S. Peirce : A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857–1866, Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
  • Peirce, C.S. (1867), “Upon Logical Comprehension and Extension”, Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Vol. 7, pp. 416–432.  ArchiveOnline.

Resources

cc: Academia.edu • Cybernetics • Laws of Form • Mathstodon
cc: Research Gate • Structural Modeling • Systems Science • Syscoi

#abduction, #c-s-peirce, #comprehension, #deduction, #extension, #hypothesis, #icon-index-symbol, #induction, #inference, #information-comprehension-x-extension, #inquiry, #intension, #logic, #peirces-categories, #pragmatic-semiotic-information, #pragmatism, #scientific-method, #semiotics, #sign-relations

2026 Problematique: Personal reflections on unrealized potential – MELISSA TULLIO, M.Des

2026 Problematique: Personal reflections on unrealized potential – MELISSA TULLIO, M.Des https://mtullio.ca/2026/06/01/2026-problematique-personal-reflections-on-unrealized-potential/

Consciousness, Sapience and Sentience—A Metacybernetic View

Consciousness, Sapience and Sentience—A Metacybernetic View https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/10/6/254

Professionalising the Cybersystemic Practitioner: Five Decades of STiP Education at the Open University

Professionalising the Cybersystemic Practitioner: Five Decades of STiP Education at the Open University (1971–2025) – Ison – Systems Research and Behavioral Science – Wiley Online Library https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sres.70088

The Thinker the Century Couldn’t Hear

The Thinker the Century Couldn’t Hear https://richarddavidhames.substack.com/p/the-thinker-the-century-couldnt-hear?r=436wsa&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true

Ray Ison wrote an obituary honouring Peter Checkland, an exceptional scholar and friend. 

Ray Ison wrote an obituary honouring Peter Checkland, an exceptional scholar and friend. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/international-federation-for-systems-research_astip-activity-7472539920541249536-csu9?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAADUV_eUBZSxZvFpx70OV050F6K5HM2MhTMo

First Principles Framework (FPF): Pattern language and core specification for admissible action in problematic engineering, research, and mixed human/AI work. · GitHub

First Principles Framework (FPF): Pattern language and core specification for admissible action in problematic engineering, research, and mixed human/AI work. · GitHub https://github.com/ailev/FPF

Leonardo Journal – CALL FOR PAPERS | FROM CYBERNETICS TO CO-CREATION: deadline 17 July 2026

CALL FOR PAPERS | FROM CYBERNETICS TO CO-CREATION
Deadline: 
10 June 2026 to 17 July 2026
Publication: 
Leonardo
From Cybernetics to Co-Creation: The Promise and Limits of Systems Thinking

From early cybernetics and feedback systems to contemporary networked ecologies and participatory platforms, systems thinking has profoundly shaped artistic, scientific, and technological practice. This Focus Section revisits systems-based approaches not as closed models, but as living, adaptive, and often contested frameworks, grounded in historical trajectories while reimagined for present and future conditions. 

We invite papers that critically examine how systems thinking has enabled and constrained forms of collaboration, authorship, governance, and care. How might contemporary practices move beyond control, optimization, or abstraction toward co-creation, relationality, and situated knowledge? What can transdisciplinary systems approaches contribute not only to health, well-being, and social resilience, but also to processes of repair and healing within fractured ecological and cultural systems?

Contributions should consider how systems thinking can be reoriented toward more just, regenerative, and hopeful forms of collective sense-making in an era of planetary instability.

Topics may include (but are not limited to): participatory systems, social and ecological feedback loops, cybernetics and care, organizational and institutional systems, indigenous and non-Western systems knowledge, and critiques of techno-solutionism. Contributions may take historical, theoretical, experimental, or practice-based forms, and should foreground how integrative methods generate new insights across art, science, and technology.

Proposals and Inquiries
Interested authors may submit manuscript proposals to editor@leonardo.info.

Manuscript Submissions
For detailed instructions for manuscript and art preparation, visit Information for Journal Authors.

To submit a completed manuscript, upload to Editorial Express  (link is external)(link is external)

Please indicate which call you are submitting for in the submission notes.

CALL FOR PAPERS: Leonardo 60th | From Cybernetics to Co-Creation | Leonardo/ISAST
https://leonardo.info/opportunity/call-for-papers-from-cybernetics-to-co-creation

HOLD THE DATE – SysPrac26 – SCiO’s Systems Thinking| Practial Impact conference, 21-22 September 2026, Cranfield University

#𝗦𝘆𝘀𝗣𝗿𝗮𝗰𝟮𝟲 — 𝗦𝗔𝗩𝗘 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗘: 𝟮𝟭–𝟮𝟮 𝗦𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 𝗮𝘁 𝗖𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗲𝗹𝗱 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝘁𝘆

Building on the energy, insights and connections created at SysPrac25 and the Systems Thinking, Systems Practice Conference at the University of Hull, we are delighted to announce the next step in our journey to learn, connect and act together as a systems practice community.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗷𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝘂𝗲𝘀

As the challenges facing organisations, communities and society become increasingly interconnected and complex, the need for practical systems thinking has never been greater.

SysPrac26 will bring together practitioners, leaders, researchers, educators, students, apprentices and those new to systems thinking alongside experienced systems professionals. Whether you are taking your first steps in the field or have been practising for many years, you will find a welcoming and inclusive environment where every perspective is valued and everyone has something to contribute.

Over two days, participants will have opportunities to:

🔹 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻

Explore ideas, methods and real-world applications of systems thinking through accessible sessions, practical examples and engaging conversations. Learn from experienced practitioners and fresh voices alike, and discover insights that you can apply directly in your own context.

🔹 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗰𝘁

Meet like-minded people who share a passion for making a positive difference. Grow your network, exchange experiences, build new collaborations and develop your confidence as a systems practitioner. One of the things people valued most about SysPrac25 was simply having the opportunity to come together with others who understand the challenges and opportunities of working with complexity.

🔹 𝗔𝗰𝘁

Turn learning into impact. Discover approaches, tools and practices that help move from insight to action, enabling more resilient, adaptive and effective responses to complex challenges. Leave with ideas, connections and renewed confidence to strengthen your own practice.

Those who attended previous events often spoke about how energising it was to spend time with such a supportive and generous community. SysPrac26 aims to build on that spirit—creating a space where people feel welcome, encouraged, challenged and inspired.

SysPrac26 is more than a conference. It is part of an ongoing journey to strengthen systems thinking in practice, grow our community and increase our collective capacity to create positive change.

📍 𝗖𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗲𝗹𝗱 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝘁𝘆
📅 𝟮𝟭–𝟮𝟮 𝗦𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲

We look forward to continuing the conversation, deepening our practice and taking the next steps together.

More information, including opportunities to contribute, will be announced soon.

hashtag#SystemsThinking hashtag#SystemsPractice hashtag#SCiO hashtag#LearnConnectAct hashtag#SysPrac26

(1) Post | LinkedIn
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/simonmaccormac_sysprac26-systemsthinking-systemspractice-activity-7472587884471062528-39e1/

Icon, Likeness, Likely Story, Likelihood, Probability • 4

Re: Icon, Likeness, Likely Story, Likelihood, Probability • 3
Re: Laws of FormLyle Anderson

Lyle,

We are here engaged in the wider context of which Peirce’s systems of graphs for propositional logic and Spencer Brown’s calculus of indications constitute a prominent corner, one might even say a “cantonical field”, but still just one corner of the larger picture, abstractly syntactic and formally deductive in character.

Over and above that niche the overarching edifice of Peirce’s Logic of Science, supported by the theory of signs and the theory of inquiry, must cover all three forms of inference — abductive, inductive, deductive — plus the bridge from qualitative logic to quantitative statistics.  That is the architecture of inquiry with which we’ll be occupied for quite some time.

Continuing from where I left off last time —

What intrigues me about the recently cited passages from Aristotle is the way he uses what we now regard as semiotic terms — icon, index, sign — to describe the elements and structures of logical syllogisms, including the modes of non‑demonstrative inference.

The roles of signs informing sign relations and the rules of inference guiding inquiries are subjects Peirce explored in depth.  Especially in the early years the subjects of signs and inquiry are so entwined in Peirce’s relevant lectures and papers that he passes from one to the other with little sense of discontinuity between the two.

Over the years, both in Peirce’s work and the community of researchers following after, there develops such an intense focus on the problem of classifying signs that the theory of signs takes on the character of a separate subject, detached from its natural connection to the theory of inquiry.

One of our tasks is to heal that rift and regain a sense of the original common root.

Resource

cc: Academia.eduCyberneticsLaws of FormMathstodon
cc: Research GateStructural ModelingSystems ScienceSyscoi

#analogy, #aristotle, #c-s-peirce, #icon-index-symbol, #induction, #inquiry, #likelihood, #likely-story, #likeness, #logic, #mathematics, #probability, #probable-reasoning, #semiotics, #sign-relations

Cybernetics, In Our Time – Tuddenham (2026)

Peter Tuddenham

Jun 13, 2026

The United Kingdom’s BBC Radio 4 gave the field forty-five minutes at peak listening time. Members of the Cybernetics Society gathered on Zoom meetings afterwards to share reactions, reflections, and look to the future and the activities of the Cybernetics Society.

https://petertuddenham.substack.com/p/cybernetics-in-our-time

Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change – Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Special Themed Issue: Presencing the Futures of Democracy and Governance

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47061/jasc.v6i1

Published: 2026-05-31

Full Issue

Editorial

Commentary from the Field

Invited Article

Original Articles (Peer-Reviewed)

Book Review

Innovations in Praxis

In Dialogue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Special Themed Issue: Presencing the Futures of Democracy and Governance

Cover Image: © 2026 Zaka Permana, Blooming Horizon, iPad using Procreate.

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Special Themed Issue: Presencing the Futures of Democracy and Governance | Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change
https://jabsc.org/index.php/jabsc/issue/view/804

Derech Hashem (The Way of God), written around 1736 by Rabbi Moshe Chaim Luzzatto (RaMCHaL), Sefaria Edition 2019, Translated by Rabbi Francis Nataf

This https://stream.syscoi.com/2024/05/27/tracing-the-roots-brief-history-of-systems-thinking-2024/ was reshared on LinkedIn, drawing the comment

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7470429570618355712/?dashCommentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Afsd_comment%3A%287470819985020444672%2Curn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7470429570618355712%29

Adail Retamal

CSEP Systems/Software Engineering – Improving the world through better systems

In the Introduction of the book “Derech Hashem” (The Way of God), written around 1736 by Rabbi Moshe Chaim Luzzatto (RaMCHaL), there is a very concise and clear explanation of Systems Thinking, to prepare the readers for what they are about to experience. It is a masterpiece!

https://www.sefaria.org/Derekh_Hashem?tab=contents

The first long paragraph of which – translated on that page from the Hebrew by Rabbi Franci Nataf, reads:


The advantage of knowing things within the framework of their parts – according to their divisions and the structures of their relationships – over their knowledge without distinction is like the advantage of seeing a garden beautified by its flowerbeds, enhanced by its paths and planted in specific rows, over seeing a thicket of reeds or a forest growing mixed together. For in truth, the perception of many parts about which we do not know their connections or true places in the structure of all that is constructed by them is nothing but a heavy and joyless burden to the intellect that desires to understand [it]. The intellect wearies itself with it; it toils, despairs, tires and has no pleasure; as it will not quench its desire to come to the purpose of any [part] that one has come to consider. For this will not come to him, since he is missing its complete context. As a great part of something is surely its relationships to those things that relate to it, and its place within its context – and this is lacking from him. So it comes out that his desire is his unresolvable burden; and his longing is his unassuageable pain. Not so is the one who knows something in its context. When he examines it, it is clearly revealed in his eyes as it [actually] is. He grows in his understanding of that to which he turns and he enjoys the beauty of his work and is exhilarated. And, in general, that which one needs to examine about his subject is [the knowledge of] its true place that we mentioned. And that is because when we surely examine all things – physical and conceptual, which is all that can be grasped by our intellects – it comes out that they are not all of one type or one function, but rather of different types and differing functions. And according to the difference in their types, so will their properties and axioms differ. And this is what compels us to distinguish between them with our intellects, so that we may truly understand them – each one according to its axioms. However the first [step in knowledge] of the types and functions is one. And that is to know to which one of them the subject belongs, meaning to the part or the whole, to the specific or the category, to the cause or the effect, to the subject or its associations. And this is what is required to know about a subject first: Is it the whole thing or a part, a category or a specific, is it a cause or an effect, is it the [actual] subject or an association?

https://www.sefaria.org/Derekh_Hashem%2C_Introduction.2?lang=bi&with=all&lang2=en

Love & Philosophy podcast: Punk, Tech & Care: B. Scot Rousse on Being Human in the AI Age

[Essential listening:]

with Hubert Dreyfus, Fernando Flores, Heidegger, and Kierkegaard

Love and PhilosophyB. Scot Rousse, and Andrea Hiott

Apr 27, 2026

https://loveandphilosophy.com/beyond-dichotomy-podcast/punk-tech-care-b-scot-rousse-being-human-in-the-ai-age

https://withoutwhy.substack.com/p/punk-tech-and-care-my-conversation

Still Out of Control – Kelly (2026)

h/t Arthur Battram

Still Out of Control
KEVIN KELLY
JUN 08, 2026



Eventually Out of Control was translated into a few other languages.
I published Out of Control 32 years ago (1994). I started writing it in 1989, which is a long time in the past for a book that promises to talk about the future. A lot in our world has changed in that time, including our attitudes about the future. Far too much has happened in the world of technology to be summed up in this note. But it is fair to wonder: how well has my book held up for the past 32 years? Is Out of Control still valid? Is it worth reading today? And what might I have written differently given what I know today? What, if anything, would I change?

Still Out of Control – by Kevin Kelly – KK
https://kevinkelly.substack.com/p/still-out-of-control