Cybernetics, virtue ethics and design – Ben Sweeting, #RSD16

[My links today are from attendance at the 50th anniversary conference of the Cybernetics Society – This was previously on but while we have the mirror hosted here at syscoi, is now – finally, sadly – down]

Cybernetics, virtue ethics and design

Sweeting, Ben (2017) Cybernetics, virtue ethics and design In: Proceedings of relating systems thinking and design (RSD6) 2017 Symposium, AHO, Oslo, Norway, 18-20 October 2017.
[img] Text
171212 Sweeting RSD6-3.pdf – Accepted Version 

Download (151kB)


In this paper I speak directly to the subject matter of this conference: to its theme of flourishing, and to the subject areas of systems thinking and design that this conference series as a whole seeks to bring together. The conference theme of flourishing is a direct reference to ethics, and in particular the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle. There has been a revival of interest in this in recent decades under the heading of virtue ethics. Aristotle defined the good as that at which all things aim, and so in terms of goals and purpose. He described the goal of human life in terms eudemonia, which is usually translated as either human flourishing or the good life. There is a clear connection between this conception of ethics in terms of purpose and both design and systems. Design is an explicitly purposeful activity, which can be understood as the attempt to devise “courses of action aimed at changing existing situations into preferred ones” (Simon, 1969/1996, p. 111). Purpose is of central concern for how we understand systems, most explicitly in cybernetics. The aim of this paper is to make explicit some of the deep interconnections between these three areas in terms of the theme of purpose, and to suggest areas of common concern where they might lend support to each other. In order to do this within the scope of this paper, I focus on a specific point of reference in each of the three areas: to Alasdair MacIntyre’s (1981/1985) After Virtue, Dalibor Vesely’s (1985, 2004, 2010) account of architecture, and to the debate around Rosenblueth, Wiener and Bigelow’s (1943) proto-cybernetic paper.

Item Type: Contribution to conference proceedings in the public domain ( Full Paper)
Subjects: V000 Historical and Philosophical studies > V500 Philosophy > V520 Moral philosophy
H000 Engineering > H600 Electrical and Electronic Engineering > H672 Cybernetics
W000 Creative Arts and Design > W200 Design
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Converis
Date Deposited: 19 Dec 2017 14:12
Last Modified: 13 Feb 2018 15:00

Source: Cybernetics, virtue ethics and design – University of Brighton Repository