Spreading and scaling up innovation and improvement – Trisha Greenhalgh and Chrysanthi Papoutsi, 2019 | The BMJ


Source: Spreading and scaling up innovation and improvement | The BMJ

Spreading and scaling up innovation and improvement

BMJ 2019365 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l2068 (Published 10 May 2019)Cite this as: BMJ 2019;365:l2068

  1. Trisha Greenhalgh, professor,
  2. Chrysanthi Papoutsi, postdoctoral researcher

Author affiliations

  1. Correspondence to T Greenhalgh trish.greenhalgh@phc.ox.ac.uk

Disseminating innovation across the healthcare system is challenging but potentially achievable through different logics: mechanistic, ecological, and social, say

Key messages

  • Spread (replicating an intervention) and scale-up (building infrastructure to support full scale implementation) are difficult

  • Implementation science takes a structured and phased approach to developing, replicating, and evaluating an intervention in multiple sites

  • Complexity science encourages a flexible and adaptive approach to change in a dynamic, self organising system

  • Social science approaches consider why people act in the way they do, especially the organisational and wider social forces that shape and constrain people’s actions

  • These approaches may be used in combination to tackle the challenges of spread and scale-up

The general practitioner in the surgery, the nurse manager on the ward, and the policy maker in the boardroom would be forgiven for losing track of all the new technologies, care pathways, and service models that could potentially improve the quality, safety, or efficiency of care. Yet we know that innovations rarely achieve widespread uptake even when there is robust evidence of their benefits (and especially when such evidence is absent or contested).1 The NHS Long Term Plan points out that every approach prioritised in the plan is already happening somewhere in the NHS but has not yet been widely adopted.2

There are common sense reasons why spreading an innovation across an entire health system is hard. Achieving any change takes work, and it usually also involves—in various combinations—spending money, diverting staff from their daily work, shifting deeply held cultural or professional norms, and taking risks. Simplistic metaphors (“blueprint,” “pipeline,” “multiplier”) aside, there is no simple or universally replicable way of implementing change at scale in a complex system. A technology or pathway that works smoothly in setting A will operate awkwardly (or not at all) in setting B.

Given these realities, what insights does the rapidly growing research literature on spread and scale-up offer the busy clinician, manager, commissioner, or policy maker? How—if at all—does this literature speak to the patient?

“Spread” generally means replicating an initiative somewhere else and “scale-up” means tackling the infrastructural problems (across an organisation, locality, or health system) that arise during full scale implementation,3 though in practice the one blurs into the other.

In this rapid review (the methods of which are described in box 1) we found that scholars of spread and scale-up had used many different theoretical lenses. We have chosen to discuss three—implementation science, complexity science, and social science, each of which is based on a different logic of change (mechanical, ecological, and social, respectively; table 1). Many successful spread and scale-up programmes draw predominantly on one of these lenses but include elements of the other two.

Continues in source: Spreading and scaling up innovation and improvement | The BMJ