Emergentism | Chapter 2: From Reduction to EmergenceBrendan Graham Dempsey7 hr ago52New Laws: Thermodynamics and Evolution
Emergentism | Chapter 2: From Reduction to Emergence
Category Archives: Discussion
A view or perspective on the world
“Any old map will do” meets “God is in every leaf of every tree” | Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science
“Any old map will do” meets “God is in every leaf of every tree”
“Any old map will do” meets “God is in every leaf of every tree” | Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science
“Any old map will do” meets “God is in every leaf of every tree”
Posted on by Andrew
As a statistician I am particularly worried about the rhetorical power of anecdotes (even though I use them in my own reasoning; see discussion below). But much can be learned from a true anecdote. The rough edges—the places where the anecdote doesn’t fit your thesis—these are where you learn.
We have recently had a discussion (here and here) of Karl Weick, a prominent scholar of business management who plagiarized a story and then went on to draw different lessons from the pilfered anecdote in several different publications published over many years.
Setting aside an issues of plagiarism and rulebreaking, I argue that, by hiding the source of the story and changing its form, Weick and his management-science audience are losing their ability to get anything out of it beyond empty confirmation.
A full discussion follows.
Systems Thinking Ontario – 2022-09-19
2022-09-19
Systems Thinking Ontario – 2022-09-19
Too late for the session, but to preserve the links and record
2022-09-19
September 19 (the second Monday of the month) is the 103rd meeting for Systems Thinking Ontario. The registration is at https://global-elephants.eventbrite.ca .
Global Elephants in the Room: A reflexive prospective following 50 years of the Global Problematique
For September’s Systems Thinking Ontario, OCADU’s professor Peter Jones will share a preview of his talk for RSD11 on a world system perspective of the Club of Rome’s Global Problematique.
It has been 50 years since the original Limits to Growth report to the Club of Rome. Since then, many of the original controversies triggered by the dire scenarios produced by the Meadows research team have been accepted as current outcomes of their prediction, anchoring its position as prescient in climate and economic policies. The Limits to Growth project was based on the original Club of Rome prospectus know as the Global Problematique, a problem framing produced by Hasan Özbekhan, a first-generation social system thinker who advocated requisite variety and stakeholder engagement to resolve the problematique.
After 50 years the technocratic approaches of systems thinking still pervade methodology and design. The globalism inherent in the Problematique also remains; with rapidly developing new economies in the Global South, these assumptions ought to also be reconsidered. Why must the Problematique be situated as “global?” Even as Özbekhan’s stakeholder-centred vision may be achievable today, but now we must ask, who are the real stakeholders for these problems? Jones critiques the original view of “the global” as originating from the Club of Rome expert-centred framing and contrast the Western policy mindset with systemic design’s stakeholder-centred systems view. Jones will discuss the mappings from these studies and show an alternative non-Western frame with significant difference in priorities, if the Global South is centred instead of the West.
Venue:
- The link for a Zoom conference will be sent upon preregistration.
- Unfortunately, due to the pandemic OCADU, sLab (Strategic Innovation Lab), 205 Richmond Street West, Room 410 is not available!
Suggested pre-reading:
Özbekhan, H., Jantsch, E., & Christakis, A. N. (1970). The predicament of mankind: A quest for structured responses to growing world-wide complexities and uncertainties. Proposal to the Club of Rome. [Part 1 excerpt]
Christakis, A. N. (2006). A retrospective structural inquiry of the Predicament of Humankind. In Volume 1: Rescuing the enlightenment from Itself (pp. 93-122). Springer, Boston, MA. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.580.2313&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Christakis, A. N. & Diedrich J. (2022). Co-constructing Retrospective and Retroductive Global Problematiques Virtually with the Logosofia platform, in the context of the Climate Crisis: A report on the Gedanken Experiment. [manuscript]
Systems thinking in public policy: Making space to think differently – Catherine Hobbs – Integration and Implementation Insights
Systems thinking in public policy: Making space to think differentlySeptember 20, 2022By Catherine Hobbs
Systems thinking in public policy: Making space to think differently – Integration and Implementation Insights
Development and application of ‘systems thinking’ principles for quality improvement | McNab et al – BMJ Open Quality
Development and application of ‘systems thinking’ principles for quality improvement
Development and application of ‘systems thinking’ principles for quality improvement | BMJ Open Quality
Development and application of ‘systems thinking’ principles for quality improvement
On doing “being ordinary” – Sacks (2010) (Chapter 16) – Structures of Social Action, Ed Maxwell Atkinson
16 – On doing “being ordinary”Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2010ByHarvey SacksEdited byJ. Maxwell Atkinson
On doing “being ordinary” (Chapter 16) – Structures of Social Action
What we talk about when we talk about context | Dourish (2003)
[I urge you to get beyond the abstract, it is worth it!]
What we talk about when we talk about context
What we talk about when we talk about context | SpringerLink
What we talk about when we talk about context
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing volume 8, pages19–30 (2004)Cite this article
Abstract
The emergence of ubiquitous computing as a new design paradigm poses significant challenges for human-computer interaction (HCI) and interaction design. Traditionally, HCI has taken place within a constrained and well-understood domain of experience—single users sitting at desks and interacting with conventionally-designed computers employing screens, keyboards and mice for interaction. New opportunities have engendered considerable interest in “context-aware computing”—computational systems that can sense and respond to aspects of the settings in which they are used. However, considerable confusion surrounds the notion of “context”—what it means, what it includes and what role it plays in interactive systems. This paper suggests that the representational stance implied by conventional interpretations of “context” misinterprets the role of context in everyday human activity, and proposes an alternative model that suggests different directions for design.
Cybernetics Society Presidents Series 20 – Cybernetics and Tribal Dynamics – Omar Kharoti and James Bryant – YouTube
Presidents Series 20 Cybernetics and Tribal Dynamics
15 Sept 20220
Omar Kharoti discusses Cybernetics and Tribal Dynamics followed by James Bryant introducing a conversation about Discovering Cybernetics
(1) Presidents Series 20 Cybernetics and Tribal Dynamics – YouTube
How Claude Shannon’s Concept of Entropy Quantifies Information | Kevin Hartnett in Quanta Magazine
INFORMATION THEORY
How Shannon Entropy Imposes Fundamental Limits on Communication
What’s a message, really? Claude Shannon recognized that the elemental ingredient is surprise.
Kevin Hartnett
September 6, 2022
Abstractions blogcomputer scienceexplainersinformation theorymathematicsAll topics
If someone tells you a fact you already know, they’ve essentially told you nothing at all. Whereas if they impart a secret, it’s fair to say something has really been communicated.How Shannon Entropy Imposes Fundamental Limits on Communication
How Claude Shannon’s Concept of Entropy Quantifies Information | Quanta Magazine
dail.stoa.com – daily emails, systems thinking is one of the key topcis
Ashby’s Law of Requisite Variety
Ashby’s Law of Requisite Variety
https://daily.stoa.com/category/systems-thinking
The Complexity Lounge – NY Meetup group and videos
The Complexity Lounge
New York, NY, USA
The study of complexity helps us to be open to new perspectives, consider non-linear non-causal relationships, and encourages an experimental mindset. We created the NYC Complexity Lounge to discuss Complexity Science, Complex Adaptive Systems, Organizational Change, and Agile / Adaptive approaches to work and everyday life. We share case studies and discuss the latest advances in complexity thinking. We also talk about sense-making principles and tools from the Cynefin Framework.
The Complexity Lounge
https://www.meetup.com/complexity-lounge/
Novi Milenkovic – Organizations and Subjectivism Pt. 1 | LinkedIn
Organizations and Subjectivism Pt. 1Published on September 14, 2022https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabula_RogerianaNovi MilenkovicNavigating Complexity5 articles FollowingPrefaceOrganization is a human way of dealing with the complexity of the world(1). When I say organization, I don’t mean strictly an enterprise, but any kind of formal or informal organization that brings people together under shared purpose or a promise of an incentive—from book clubs or social activism, to startups or corporations… Organization facilitates creation of order, and order is a low entropy state. It’s how we make our existence more bearable in a universe that otherwise craves disorder. It’s well prepared food, electric cars or skyscrapers that are built by organizing matter into states that could possibly occur, but are highly improbable. It’s the laws, theories or knowledge that we expand to decrease the uncertainty in the world. The entropic concept I’m referring to is not thermodynamic entropy, but statistical entropy, which is a property of a probability distribution, not a real system, and as such is lacking any inherent semantics, it’s a purely syntactic concept(2) If something is ordered it is constrained to the point where future outcomes are predictable as long as the constraints can be sustained(3). It does not matter if we talk about service (an activity) or a product (a physical or a digital object), if the constraints are clear and the causality is linear—it’s order. Consequently, if we understand the causality, we can replicate the outcome.
(1) Organizations and Subjectivism Pt. 1 | LinkedIn
The thermodynamics of life taking shape
The thermodynamics of life taking shapeby Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo (UTokyo-IIS)
The thermodynamics of life taking shape
Complexity and Leadership – 1st Edition – Chauhan et al
Complexity and LeadershipEdited By Kiran Chauhan, Emma Crewe, Chris MowlesCopyright Year 2023Paperback£34.99Hardback£120.00eBook£31.49ISBN 9780367551599Published September 12, 2022 by Routledge266 Pages
Complexity and Leadership – 1st Edition – Kiran Chauhan – Emma Crewe
#NewMacy Studios @RSD11 · #NewMacy
#NewMacy Studios @RSD11
#NewMacy Studios @RSD11 · #NewMacy
#NewMacy Studios @RSD11
by NewMacy 22/8/2022
Co-Leads
Pille Bunnell, Carlos Castellanos, Damian Chapman, Kate Doyle, Xiao Zoe Fang, Mikal Giancola, Michael Lieber, TJ McLeish, Paul Pangaro, Eve Pinsker, Eryk Salvaggio, Larry Richards, Fred Steier, Mark Sullivan, Claudia Westermann
Abstract
#NewMacy emerged in March 2020 as the pandemic of COVID became the newest global wicked challenge. Since then little has changed in the fights against pandemics of biology and technology, racism and structural inequities, environment and economics. We embrace the timespan of RSD11 as “the long now” in recognition that these systemic challenges require new scales of effort and expectation across generations. We invoke the original Macy Meetings, which arose from a recognition that understanding purposive systems would be essential for addressing the failures of WWII. In the 21st-century, #NewMacy catalyzes conversations for action across disciplines, geographies, and generations through systemic principles, processes, and communities. #NewMacy creates conditions for enacting productive responses among individuals and communities that bring about change in the near-term, while planning for and committing to the time-span required to effect lasting change.
Our current focus is a new framing for “ontogenesis,” specifically, that of developing new ways of becoming. To survive in a changing world, we must embrace resilience in lieu of security interpreted as constancy. Hence we substitute ontogenetic resilience as our framing intention — and Cybernetics as key.
How might we practice ontogenetic resilience? We begin by embracing the human as the basic unit of change. Conversation is the unifying process. We adopt a structure of themed and design-led “Studios” that are explorations of ontogenetic principles. These Studios identify cultural sites where ontogenetic resilience is needed and where we may pursue inclusive and recursive modes of experimentation. The purpose of the #NewMacy Studio construct is to enable deep participation through activities such as prototyping, play, exploration, enactment, and improvisation. The following Studios at RSD11 will enact conversations for action across the middle days of the symposium:
- Radiant Circles — Cybernetic Musings on Resonant Forms
- Pandemic of “Today’s AI”
- Art as Steersmanship
- “Panarchy” as a Sense Making Tool
- Cultural Premises, Conscious Purpose, and Design
- Prototyping Conversation
After the Studios we will all gather for a final conversation to consider: What’s next? How do we grow into an increasingly inclusive ecosystem of Studios? What new, vital activities will we design? The dialogue, collaboration, and matchmaking performed in this session serve as the means for a recursive process of integration and synthesis, one directed toward ongoing, empathetic, intelligent, and sustainable action.
Keywords: Pandemics, wicked challenges, second-order Cybernetics, systemic change, ontological security, conversation, ontogenetic resilience, recursive feedback.
You must be logged in to post a comment.