Living systems – Wikipedia

[I’ve always been suspicious of ‘living systems theory’ as I’ve experienced it as (ironically) highly mechanistic and somewhat simplistic – but there’s a 1,000+ page book so I can’t say I know. The nesting described here sounds good, the fundamental input-process-output dynamic seems potentially limiting]
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Living systems are open self-organizing life forms that interact with their environment. These systems are maintained by flows of information, energy and matter.

Some scientists have proposed in the last few decades that a general living systems theory is required to explain the nature of life.[1] Such a general theory, arising out of the ecological and biological sciences, attempts to map general principles for how all living systems work. Instead of examining phenomena by attempting to break things down into components, a general living systems theory explores phenomena in terms of dynamic patterns of the relationships of organisms with their environment.[2]

Theory

Living systems theory is a general theory about the existence of all living systems, their structureinteractionbehavior and development. This work is created by James Grier Miller, which was intended to formalize the concept of life. According to Miller’s original conception as spelled out in his magnum opus Living Systems, a “living system” must contain each of twenty “critical subsystems”, which are defined by their functions and visible in numerous systems, from simple cells to organisms, countries, and societies. In Living Systems Miller provides a detailed look at a number of systems in order of increasing size, and identifies his subsystems in each. Miller considers living systems as a subset of all systems. Below the level of living systems, he defines space and timematter and energyinformation and entropy, levels of organization, and physical and conceptual factors, and above living systems ecological, planetary and solar systems, galaxies, etc.[3]

Living systems according to Parent (1996) are by definition “open self-organizing systems that have the special characteristics of life and interact with their environment. This takes place by means of information and material-energy exchanges. Living systems can be as simple as a single cell or as complex as a supranational organization such as the European Union. Regardless of their complexity, they each depend upon the same essential twenty subsystems (or processes) in order to survive and to continue the propagation of their species or types beyond a single generation”.[4]

Miller said that systems exist at eight “nested” hierarchical levels: cell, organ, organism, group, organization, community, society, and supranational system. At each level, a system invariably comprises twenty critical subsystems, which process matter–energy or information except for the first two, which process both matter–energy and information: reproducer and boundary.

The processors of matter–energy are:

  • ingestor, distributor, converter, producer, storage, extruder, motor, supporter

The processors of information are:

  • input transducer, internal transducer, channel and net, timer (added later), decoder, associator, memory, decider, encoder, output transducer.

Miller’s living systems theory[edit]

James Grier Miller in 1978 wrote a 1,102-page volume to present his living systems theory. He constructed a general theory of living systems by focusing on concrete systems—nonrandom accumulations of matter–energy in physical space–time organized into interacting, interrelated subsystems or components. Slightly revising the original model a dozen years later, he distinguished eight “nested” hierarchical levels in such complex structures. Each level is “nested” in the sense that each higher level contains the next lower level in a nested fashion.

His central thesis is that the systems in existence at all eight levels are open systems composed of twenty critical subsystems that process inputs, throughputs, and outputs of various forms of matter–energy and information. Two of these subsystems—reproducer and boundary—process both matter–energy and information. Eight of them process only matter–energy. The other ten process information only.

All nature is a continuum. The endless complexity of life is organized into patterns which repeat themselves—theme and variations—at each level of system. These similarities and differences are proper concerns for science. From the ceaseless streaming of protoplasm to the many-vectored activities of supranational systems, there are continuous flows through living systems as they maintain their highly organized steady states.[5]

Seppänen (1998) says that Miller applied general systems theory on a broad scale to describe all aspects of living systems.[6]

Continues in source: Living systems – Wikipedia

what are the key things to learn about Pattern Languages? What’s a good way in

I’m at a retreat on ‘building the field of systems change’ and was asked about pattern language –  what’s a good way to see an overview and grasp core concepts? Probably mentioning the medicine wheel, Nietzsche and ayurveda wasn’t the best way in – though I referenced a bunch of the below. And we connected to Lakoff’s ideas on metaphor and framing.

Any advance on this?

 

David Ing :

http://coevolving.com/commons/20161028-pattern-manual-for-service-systems-thinking

(includes slides and video)

and much more, for example

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/alexandrian-pattern-language-wicked-problems-david-ing/

Click to access Ing_Slides_2014.pdf

(and his recent book)

David is the person to speak to for current state of the craft, and controversies, and history

 

From Christopher Alexander (modern ‘original’ pattern language)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Pattern_Language

https://www.patternlanguage.com/​

full pdf http://library.uniteddiversity.coop/Ecological_Building/A_Pattern_Language.pdf

 

​Decent paper:

http://zeta.math.utsa.edu/~yxk833/StructurePattern.html

“The Structure of Pattern Languages”, by Nikos A. Salingaros

​This builds on Christopher Alexander but the point in David Ing’s PUARL 2016 paper is that ideas that are based in physical space don’t necessarily apply in social spaces. In particular, service systems are social, not physical – and therefore interactive (see below).

 

This is probably more useful for complex, human systems: https://ingbrief.wordpress.com/2017/10/29/20171025-0930-michael-mehaffy-horizons-of-pattern-languages-software-cities-planet-plop/

 

 

​conferences:

PLoP – pattern languages of programmes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pattern_Languages_of_Programs

most relevant

PLAST – Pattern Languages for Systemic Transformation

https://www.facebook.com/groups/125513674232534/?ref=nf_target&fref=nf

https://model.report/s/iq7pfa/a_pattern_language_for_systemic_transformation

 

One of the main things that continues the Alexandrian work is PUARL – http://puarl.uoregon.edu/

The person leading PUARL is Hajo Neis, who is a coauthor with Christopher Alexander https://archenvironment.uoregon.edu/architecture/hajo-neis and http://pages.uoregon.edu/hajoneis/

 

Helene Finidori is also an interesting and active person to speak to:

https://www.linkedin.com/in/helenefinidori/​

 

And she is closer to, I think, all the group dynamic/facilitation pattern languages ​

https://groupworksdeck.org/

MG Taylor method : http://www.matttaylor.com/public/public/papers_06/mgt_modeling_language_2.htm

http://www.mgtaylor.com/mgtaylor/gg_description.html

 

(and of course pattern ‘recognition’ goes much deeper, certainly to cognition and metacognition, see Bongard Games references)

 

see also https://model.report/s/wr7kjl/a_connection_language_dialogue_methods_collaboration_from_cynthia_kurtz​

​and the collection of large scale group facilitation techniques:

https://model.report/s/np0uvr/a_collection_of_collective_systems_facilitation_and_delivery_techniques​

 

David says:

‘The conventional description is that “a pattern is a solution to a problem in context”. The challenge, as I’m writing up in the yet-to-be-released workshop proposal for PUARL …

‘In 1966, hierarchical structure (graphically drawn as a root with trees) was criticized in “A City Is Not A Tree” in favour of a semi-lattice (Alexander 1966/1967). Also in 1967, at the formation for Center for Environmental Structure, Pattern Manual then chartered:

‘The environmental pattern language will contain hundreds of subsystems and tens of thousands of individual patterns. Every conceivable kind of building, every part of every kind of building, and every piece of the larger environment will be specified by one or more subsystems of the environmental pattern language.

‘In summary: An environmental pattern language is a coordinated body of design solutions capable of generating the complete physical structure of a city. The language is designed to grow and improve continuously as a result of criticism and feedback from the field (Alexander 1967).

 

‘So, patterns are less than subsystems, which are less than systems.

‘And the problem is that traditional Alexandrian pattern language is static (as in a built environment) and not interactive (as in a personal computer).’

 

…’pattern language’ is often used quite loosely for generally useful pattern recognition too.

Social Enterprise Systems Engineering | James Mason | 2015 | Conf on Systems Engineering Research

Theory-building on Social-Enterprise Systems-Engineering “as an applied discipline and as an addition to the development intervention field”.  Written by James Mason when he was a Ph.D. candidate at Stevens Institute of Technology, he’s now a professor at Lesley University (Cambridge, MA)

Social Enterprise Systems Engineering (SESE) is defined as that body of knowledge and practice whereby engineering discipline is applied to plan, analyze, design, implement and operate a coordinated network of enterprises processes and stakeholders – in order to create sustainable social value for marginalized populations. Engineering discipline brings the rigor of lifecycle process, verification, validation, non-functional requirements modeling and simulation to assure that the design and performance of solutions are driven by and are traceable to the requirements of stakeholder populations – and that opportunity selection and operational practices align with the social mission and values of the enterprise.

Mason (2015) Figure 2

James Mason | “Social Enterprise Systems Engineering” | 2015 | Procedia Computer Science, 2015 Conference on Systems Engineering Research (open access) | doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.067

#social-enterprise, #systems-engineering

The big bang of equity + systems change — the outside – Tuesday Ryan-Hart

The big bang of equity + systems change

TUESDAY RYAN-HART

By bringing fresh air to persistent challenges, we can transcend overwhelm to make a better world together. That’s what we do at THE OUTSIDE: we help collaborators get unstuck with unforgettably pivotal events, capacity-building, and strategy that sparks significant change. Today, we explore the critical ingredient to change that makes a difference: equity. —Tuesday

A conscious practice of equitable systems change often begins with a bang—an abrupt coming-to, a sad realization, a peak of failure or outcry or injustice. Something urgent enough to make us realize the effectiveness and relevance of our systems is diminishing exponentially. From higher up than we have before, we examine the way we live and realize we have more questions than answers.

It dawns on us: the systems governing much of our world are suddenly not as successful as some of us had presumed they should be. Today, this awareness is rapidly shifting:

  • Our concept of capitalism
  • How we instinctively build cities, products, or democracies
  • How we administer education, poverty relief, natural resources, or human rights
  • How we control, design, and deliver the modern world through our bureaucracies, organizations, and institutions

As society’s peripheral vision expands to acknowledge the innate value, presence, and contributions of more people, those with a legacy of privilege can see what marginalized communities have always seen—that ‘everything is fine’ applies to a shrinking minority. Everything is, quite plainly, not fine.  source

Continues in source

 

Systems Change with an Equity Lens: Community Interventions that Shift Power and Center Race – YouTube

Resources on systems: Toolkits & Practice Guides – rachel sinha – Medium

Resources on systems: Toolkits & Practice Guides

Ok you’re committed to taking a systemic approach, now what?

I’ll tell you what — Total Overwhelm — as you Google it and try and work out where on earth to start.

The good news is there’s been some brilliant collating of tools, frameworks and practice guides for systems change over the last two years.

To make this simple, I’ve looked back through my newsletter content for the last year and condensed this down to the best.

My newsletter is designed to share resources across the field of systems change, so if you want to keep abreast of developments, check it out and sign up. I know everyone hates newsletters, but if you’re interested in systems change, this one is seriously simple and useful.

If you have great resources I’m missing, get in touch (rachel@thesystemstudio.com). And if you missed my blog last month on communicating systems change, you can check this out here.

Systems Toolkits

Toolkit: From the Academy for Systems Change. Taking you through tools for systems leadership, developing a system-wise team, building organizational capacity and engaging stakeholders for systems change. Systems Leaders Fieldbook.

Toolkit: Great list of systems tools and resources, designed for grantmakers, but could be used by anyone. Developed by Geofunders, Systems Grant-making Resource Guide.

Practice Guide: Another useful collection of tools for systemic design from Alberta CoLab, Field Guide to Systems Design.

Practice Guide: Specifically for Innovation Labs, (often used in systems change) Social Innovation Lab Guide from The Waterloo Institute of Social Innovation and Resilience.

Collaboration and community building

Framework: How can we help people create more meaningful communities? This tool is great from Community Canvas.

Toolkit: Nice toolkit from Ashoka on Forming innovative alliances

Systems change for campaigners, activist and organizers

Toolkit: I really, really love this toolkit from the NEON network learn everything from effective campaign strategies for systems change, to building your systems leadership

Measuring systems change

Resource List: Systems change evaluation resources list, from the helpful people at the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation

sources on systems: Toolkits & Practice Guides – rachel sinha – Medium

Complex Adaptive Systems & Urban Morphogenesis

cxdig's avatarComplexity Digest

This thesis looks at how cities operate as Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS). It focuses on how certain characteristics of urban form can support an urban environment’s capacity to self-organize, enabling emergent features to appear that, while unplanned, remain highly functional. The research is predicated on the notion that CAS processes operate across diverse domains: that they are ‘generalized’ or ‘universal’. The goal of the dissertation is then to determine how such generalized principles might ‘play out’ within the urban fabric. The main thrust of the work is to unpack how elements of the urban fabric might be considered as elements of a complex system and then identify how one might design these elements in a more deliberate manner, such that they hold a greater embedded capacity to respond to changing urban forces. The research is further predicated on the notion that, while such responses are both imbricated with, and stewarded…

View original post 146 more words

The Systems Thinker – Creating Learning Organizations – The Systems Thinker

CREATING LEARNING ORGANIZATIONS

The “1992 Systems Thinking in Action Conference: Creating Learning Organizations” made a statement that creating learning organizations is a long-term process of fundamental change. The 600-plus participants showed their commitment to that journey through their enthusiastic involvement throughout the 27, days. Over 30 concurrent sessions helped add details and richness to the central theme, providing people with the opportunity to learn new tools and techniques as well as share their experiences putting those ideas into practice.

Each of the three keynote speakers provided a different perspective on what it means to create a learning organization. The following pages contain excerpts from their talks, which helped paint, in broad brushstrokes, the essence of what is needed to build learning organizations.

 

Continues in source: The Systems Thinker – Creating Learning Organizations – The Systems Thinker

WHY FEW ORGANIZATIONS ADOPT SYSTEMS THINKING Russell L. Ackoff

I frequently talk to groups of managers on the nature of systems thinking and its
radical implications to management. In doing so I use several case studies involving
prominent American corporations. At the end of the presentation I am almost always
asked, “If this way of thinking is as good as you say it is, why don’t more
organizations use it?”

continues (pdf) at http://ackoffcenter.blogs.com/ackoff_center_weblog/files/Why_few_aopt_ST.pdf

Linear and non-linear causality

csl4d's avatarCSL4D

Systems thinking and the nature of reality

Complexity Labs         In my last post I made use of a concept map of linear management, which I had made in January 2013. It was fairly neat and simple and all that with a lot of explanatory power. I used it as a contrast to non-linear management, especially of wicked problems. It satisfied me at the time, but it did not answer all questions. Linear management is one thing, but does that mean there are linear and non-linear systems? Or linear and non-linear problems? What about causality and correlation in complex situations? How exactly should we understand them? I finally googled ‘causality’ and ‘correlation’ in Youtube, which brought me to a ComplexityLabs video. I happen to have a fetish for word combinations for 14 letters, so ComplexityLabs (about) was right for me. They have their own…

View original post 1,315 more words

SCiO Viable System Model – Beginners (SC101) – Summer 2018 Tickets, Sat, 14 Jul 2018 at 09:30 | Eventbrite

 

SCiO Viable System Model – Beginners (SC101) – Summer 2018

SCiO – Systems in Cybernetics in Organisation (PDP)

Saturday, 14 July 2018 from 09:30 to 17:00 (BST)

Ticket Information

Please book through EventBrite.

SCiO members £40

Open University student £40

Public £100

Share SCiO Viable System Model – Beginners (SC101) – Summer 2018

Event Details

This is a whole day workshop designed for those relatively new to VSM and provides basic training in building a Model of an organisation using VSM.

The attendees work together in groups to develop their model of a case study organisation and to diagnose weaknesses. The workshop follows a structured approach, with a series of steps that take the groups through a modelling process in (relatively!) easy stages.

The case study is based on a real organisation – a medium sized IT and office supplies company and provides a platform for developing the skills needed to take normal organisational information, show how that relates to the VSM and how the VSM can provide a set of new insights into the company.

The workshop will be run by Patrick Hoverstadt of Fractal Consulting.

Booking

The workshop is open to members and non-members of SCiO. The fee for members and OU students is £40 and for all others is £100. Places are limited, so please book early.

Venue

Development House, 56 – 64 Leonard St, London, EC2A 4LT

http://www.ethicalproperty.co.uk/developmenthouse.php

Timing

9.30am for a prompt 10am start. Finishing at 5pm.

There will be a break for lunch (bring your own, or some eating and food places are near by).

Source: SCiO Viable System Model – Beginners (SC101) – Summer 2018 Tickets, Sat, 14 Jul 2018 at 09:30 | Eventbrite

Wake up to find out that you are the eyes of the world! Daniel Christian Wahl

The ‘Santiago Theory of Cognition’ proposed by the Chilean biologists and neuroscientists Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela offers a…

Source: Wake up to find out that you are the eyes of the world!

Complexity Live — June 8 6pm GMT (7pm BST)

Complexity Live

by HumanCurrent

The co-hosts of The HumanCurrent are very excited to announce they are collaborating with Complexity Labs for a series of live streaming video conversations about all things complexity.

We are calling this video discussion series “Complexity Live” and it will be a once a month event hosted on Google Hangouts (YouTube Live) at Complexity Labs Youtube Channel .

Our very first Complexity Live will take place Friday, June 8th at 6PM GMTand anyone with a curious mind can listen in and ask questions while the conversation unfolds. If you are unable to attend the live event, don’t worry, you will still be able to watch the recorded conversation on Youtube.

Complexity Live group discussions will include up to 10 people and we are extending invitations to anyone interested in being an active participant. If you would like to become an active participant in our upcoming conversation on June 8th, please fill out this form.

We want to encourage all our community members to join these live events, because there could be some surprise guests joining the conversation 🙂

We hope to see you at Complexity Live!

You can listen to the HumanCurrent podcast here and don’t forget to subscribe in iTunes. Listen to our recent podcast interview with co-author of Embracing Complexity, Jean Boulton. Let’s work happy!

 

Source: Complexity Live — HumanCurrent

SCiO Open Meeting and AGM – Summer 2018 Mon, 16 Jul 2018, London UK

An open meeting where a series of presentations of general interest regarding systems practice will be given – this will include ‘craft’ and active sessions, as well as introductions to theory.

09:30 – an introduction to the viable system model. Main presentations start at 10:00.

Please note that the AGM will follow on from the open day (for members)

DATE AND TIME

Mon 16 July 2018

09:30 – 17:00 BST

Add to Calendar

LOCATION

BT Centre

81 Newgate Street

London

EC1A 7AJ

Source: SCiO Open Meeting and AGM – Summer 2018 Tickets, Mon, 16 Jul 2018 at 09:30 | Eventbrite

Regeneration, as described by Daniel Christian Wahl

Sustainability, says @DrDCWahl, may be better described as health, which includes definitions for regeneration.  In an interview on web video that included Fritjof Capra, Wahl cites Bill McDonough and Bill Reed:

[19:20 Simon Robinson] So, Daniel it’s fantastic to have you on this call — you know — as an author who has very much written extensively about regeneration.  Tecently there was an article in The Guardian, talking about the need to switch from sustainability to the concept of regeneration.  So, given the fact that — you know — for many years, Fritjof’s Systems View of Life has very much been inspiring people, why do you feel now that a lot of people who have already been working in the area of sustainability and now kind of focusing on the concepts of regeneration …  What is regeneration for you?

[20:09 Daniel Christian Wahl] When I, in 2006, was working on — between 2003 and 2006 — was working on my PhD, which I thought was going to be in design for sustainability … about a year and a half into the PhD … I realized that there somehow — and I’m not I know that there’s a lot of people who work in sustainability who have a fully regenerative understanding of sustainability so this is not a replacement of one term or with another — it’s just the the strength that what — what came out for me while I was doing my PhD research — is that sustainability as a word doesn’t actually tell us what we’re trying to sustain.  It’s it could be applying to all sorts of applied to all sorts of things.   And so in the end I changed the title of my PhD to Design for Human and Planetary health.

[20:50] From a systems view of life, that’s the pattern of health, the pattern that connects, that brings health and well-being to the entire holarchy of life from cells to organisms to communities to the whole biosphere.  And that’s what we’re trying to sustain.

[21:18] The word regenerative more clearly speaks to this need for regenerating the patterns of life, because basically what has happened over the last 150 or 250 years since the Industrial Revolution, is that we have caused so much damage to the system and deforested, emitted, so much carbon that we need to do a lot more than simply not adding any more damage, which is one  interpretation of sustainability.

[21:49] As Bill McDonough used to say, sustainability is one hundred percent less bad. It’s the neutral point.  But you can move beyond that.  And Bill Reid has created a wonderful … and then the people at Regenesis group … have developed a wonderful spectrum where you go beyond sustainability into restorative.  But restorative can still be done in the mindset of humanity over nature, rather than humanity as participant in nature, as nature.

[22:20] And when it’s done like that we get these projects where people plant cool eucalyptus trees in in dry areas and and celebrate that they’ve planted a hundred thousand or million trees.  And then they die a year later.  So that’s that’s the kind of engineering mindset of restorative.

[22:36] And then there’s the step of reconciliatory, where we put humanity back in nature.  We understand that we are participants deeply dependent on the planetary life-support system.

[22:49] Only when we intend to design as nature, not just learning from nature, but on our own agency as living beings in this process, can we start to work regeneratively.

“Regeneration: A Webinar with Fritjof Capra, Simon Robinson and Daniel Christian Wahl” | July 8, 2017 at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DU699CwJiv4?t=19m20s

#health, #regeneration, #restorative, #sustainability