CybSights Insights: Putting on CyBeer Goggles( in public administration) Tickets, Tue 23 Mar 2021 at 18:00 UK time | £20 for CybSoc membership for the year

source:

CybSights Insights: Putting on CyBeer Goggles( in public administration) Tickets, Tue 23 Mar 2021 at 18:00 | Eventbrite

MAR 23

CybSights Insights: Putting on CyBeer Goggles( in public administration)

by CybSights: The Insights Series Following£0 – £20

Event Information

View the world as a cybernetician. Tim Falkiner explores POSIWID, isomorphism, & variety balance rooted in town planning & law.

About this Event

The Insights Series is an eclectic and learned collection of monthly events on the 4th Tuesday of each month hosted by Cybernetics Society. There will be lectures, seminars, conversations, debates, participation, all advancing our knowledge of cybernetics and related disciplines and their applications to real world needs.

Cybernetics is the science of achievement, the great meta-discipline of our time.

The CybSights Insights series is normally curated and hosted by the Secretary, Angus Jenkinson, FCybS. Attendance is free. Non-members are invited to make an optional donation or to Join.

In this session we welcome an Australian.

We are particularly delighted to be able to welcome Tim Falkiner with his experience in town planning, law, and legilstion with ‘homeskooled’ cybernetics.

Putting on our CyBeer Goggles

The underlying object of this discussion is to have the participants exercise their ability to think in cybernetic terms. To put on “cybeer” goggles and view the world as a cyberneticist. Cybernetics is a large field, but Tim has selected three cybernetic topics to explore. In three 25 minute segments, Tim will (i) explain what he understands of each topic; (ii) give some applications of that law or technique and (iii) invite the participants to give examples of how they apply the laws and techniques in their own professions or lives.

POSIWID The purpose of a system is what it does. Our purpose often defines the extent of the system or systems. It is helpful, in considering the purpose of a system from an objective, scientific, cybernetic viewpoint; to use Stafford Beer’s concept of POSIWID.

Isomorphism – The control system is isomorphic with the system under control. The town planner, J. Brian McLoughlin, writing about urban and regional planning systems, makes the point that control systems must have the same form and operation as the systems which they control —an application of the Conant-Ashby theorem:

“… the control devices for any system have to be isomorphic with the system to be controlled, that is, they have to be of similar form. This enables us to say that the planning process must have a similar ‘shape’ to the human ecosystem.”

Balancing variety – Given the control system must be isomorphic with the system under control, and given the infinite variety involved in real-world systems, a regulator must balance the resources available to it with the system to be controlled. Problems of increasing, decreasing, and balancing variety in time are considered.

Tim Falkiner – Crown solicitor, town planner, barrister, legislator

Tim lives in Melbourne, Australia with a career blending law and town planning. This gives experience in law as a regulator, system design and the science of cybernetics. As town planner, legal officer in the Victorian Ministry for Planning and Environment and the Crown Solicitor’s Office of Victoria in the Constitution, Legislation and Advisings section, he gained wide experience of land use planning and environmental legislation. He wrote the specification for the first computerised tribunal registry system in Victoria. Tim has practised as a barrister and is a life member of the Victorian Planning and Environmental Law Association. He learned cybernetic controls systems theory in 1976 and found other parallels (e.g. between Garth Thornton’s book “Legislative Drafting” and Frederick Brook’s book on the development of the IBM System 360 and OS/360, its operating system). He is the author (1982) of “Scientific Legislation – The Use of Cybernetics and Software Engineering Knowledge to Explain What Legislation Is, How it Behaves and How It should be Designed, Maintained and Replaced” influenced by Stafford Beer’s cybernetics. He is now revisiting it to reconcile Beer’s definition of planning as a continuous process of making and discarding plans, with the difficulties, so clearly outlined by software engineers of maintaining legislation in the face of continuous change towards a future more dynamically adaptive legislative style based on cybernetic principles.

Join us, and engage in the dynamics of these key concepts

The sessions are designed for audience participation!

book at source:

CybSights Insights: Putting on CyBeer Goggles( in public administration) Tickets, Tue 23 Mar 2021 at 18:00 | Eventbrite

Second Order Science: Logic, Strategies, Methods Tickets, Tue 23 Feb 2021 at 18:00 UK time | £20 CybSoc membership for the year

source:

Second Order Science: Logic, Strategies, Methods Tickets, Tue 23 Feb 2021 at 18:00 | Eventbrite

FEB 23

Second Order Science: Logic, Strategies, Methods

by CybSights: The Insights Series Following£0 – £20

Science is headed for a turn, waking up to another level of logic that recognises the observer’s in both the world and the making of science

Cybernetics is the science of achievement, the great meta-discipline of our time.

The CybSights Insights series is normally curated and hosted by the Secretary, Angus Jenkinson, FCybS. Attendance is free. Non-members are invited to make an optional donation or to Join. Follow us for news of future events.

We are particularly delighted to be able to welcome an eminent member of the cybernetic discipline discussing the very future of science.

The initial generation of cybernetics was keen to develop smart technology and to show the parallels between machine and human, after all people implanted human designs into their machine organization. Later cybernetics was more concerned about the processes of the living, as well as the ways in which the ‘observation process’ (whether done by a robot, frog, or person of some cultural background) shaped knowledge and behaviour. This was also part of an evolving shift in the understanding of the world . A next step is a shift in the understanding of science itself. Dr Stuart Umpleby is a leading thinker in this movement and this session should be a treat.” — Angus Jenkinson, Secretary of CybSoc

Second Order Science: Logic, Strategies, Methods —Colloquy

book in source:

Second Order Science: Logic, Strategies, Methods Tickets, Tue 23 Feb 2021 at 18:00 | Eventbrite

Insights Series: Humberto Maturana on Autopoiesis and Cybernetics Tickets, Tue 25 May 2021 at 18:00 | £20 for Cybernetics Society membership for the year

Insights Series: Humberto Maturana on Autopoiesis and Cybernetics Tickets, Tue 25 May 2021 at 18:00 | Eventbrite
  • MAY 25

Insights Series: Humberto Maturana on Autopoiesis and Cybernetics

by CybSights: The Insights Series Follow£0 – £20Tickets

About this Event

The Insights Series is an eclectic and learned collection of monthly events on the 4th Tuesday of each month. There will be lectures, seminars, conversations, debates, participation, all advancing our knowledge of cybernetics and its applications to real world needs.

It is the science of achievement, the great meta-discipline of our time.

Events are normally curated and hosted by the Secretary, Angus Jenkinson, FCybS. Get in touch of you have an idea. Attendance is free. Non-members are invited to make a donation or Join.

The Cybernetics Society has been hosting conversations and lectures since the late 1960s. We also have an Annual Conference. Videos are shared on our YouTube Channel.

Humberto Maturana on Autopoiesis and Cybernetics

Dr Humberto Maturana Romesin HonFCybS

Assisted by

Sebastián Gaggero, operational leader of Matritizica, Chile.

Angus Jenkinson: “I am delighted to let you know that Humberto Maturana, one of our Hon Fellows, will provide an overview of the main elements composing the understanding of the living within autopoiesis, a ley cybernetic paradigm. Be prepared to listen slowly to the mature understanding of one of the great scientists of our time. As you probably know, Dr. Maturana was a co-founder of Autopoiesis with Dr Francisco Varela. Associated with the Macy conference generation, he came to prominence in one of the most influential papers in the history of science co-authored with Lettvin, McCulloch, and Pitts: “What the Frog’s Eye Tells the Frog’s Brain.”

(Proceedings of the IRE 47, no. 11 (1959): 1940-1951).

In 1974, he and Varela published their first major paper on autopoiesis with R Uribe: “Autopoiesis: The Organization of Living Systems, Its Characterization and a Model.” In 1978, he published Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living with Varela. In recent decades, Humberto Maturana has collaborated extensively with others.

I remember reading with huge excitement Maturana and Varela’s 1987 landmark text, The Tree Of Knowledge: the Biological Roots of Human Understanding. The original edition was developed and published in a closed edition in 1985 by Maturana, Varela, and Rolf Behnke, a member of the Chilean government, who had conceived and funded a project to provide an alternative view of life to the Organisation of American States (OAS). As Varela explains, they wanted to put an alternative epistemology into the world of biological science and did so by what could be called the ‘cheeky method’ of pretending that it was a basic textbook. The naive reader could read it as such while the professional would see a stark contrast to the standard textbooks. Why was it so exciting? It proposed another view of life, of intelligence, and an inversion of the standard model of competition. For many like myself who are profoundly uncomfortable with the Darwinian struggle for existence model and the neo-Darwinian selfish gene, it was a wonderful, provocative, and profoundly thoughtful presentation of another way of understanding life itself and life’s understanding of itself.

The fundamental concept — a complete self-referential architecture of thought — that he initiated was “autopoiesis” of course, a fully interactional analysis of the co-dynamic of cognition and life of any kind. Organisms maintain their own identity (by what I have called active causation) through circular organization, which

constitutes a homeostatic system whose function is to produce and maintain this very same circular organization by determining that the components that specify it be those whose synthesis or maintenance it secures.

While to an observer, this is “structurally coupled” to their environment, each living organism lives life within its own cognitive world — the “Leibnizian Gap” of disconnect between mentality, nervous system, and world. It is a position that benefited from his reading of von Euxküll. Along with and embedded in this are other key ideas: the co-evoluton of species and their ecosystems; the biology of love, constructivism; fundamental relativity (a notion that upsets many scientific apple carts); and the biological basis of cognition, and the work he is engaging on now that he will speak of. Cognition and learning are then a fundamental input into evolution.

He is then a precisely creative mind and a giant of cybernetics whose ideas controversial or mainstream must be engaged with. In particular they have great responsance for understanding not merely living organisms but social forms.

In Maturana’s early fundamental paper of 1975, The Organization of the Living: A Theory of the Living Organization (International journal of man-machine studies 7, no. 3 (1975): 313-33), he proposed: The fundamental feature that characterizes living systems is autonomy, and any account of their organization as systems that can exist as individual unities must show what autonomy is as a phenomenon proper to them, and how it arises in their operation as such unities. Accordingly the following is proposed.

(1) That autonomy in living systems is a feature of self-production (autopoiesis), and that a living system is properly characterized only as a network of processes of production of components that is continuously, and recursively, generated and realized as a concrete entity (unity) in the physical space, by the interactions of the same components that it produces as such a network. This organization I call the autopoietic organization, and any system that exhibits it is an autopoietic system in the space in which its components exist; in this sense living systems are autopoietic systems in the physical space.

(2) That the basic consequence of the autopoietic organization is that everything that takes place in an autopoietic system is subordinated to the realization of its autopoiesis, otherwise it disintegrates.

(3) That the fundamental feature that characterizes the nervous system is that it is a closed network of interacting neurons in which every state of neuronal activity generates other states of neuronal activity. Since the nervous system is a component subsystem in an autopoietic unity, it operates by generating states of relative neuronal activity that participate in the realization of the autopoiesis of the organism which it integrates.

(4) That the autopoietic states that an organism adopts are determined by its structure (the structure of the nervous system included), and that the structure of the organism (including its nervous system) is at any instant the result of its evolutionary and ontogenic structural coupling with the medium in which it is autopoietic, obtained while the autopoiesis is realized.

(5) That language arises as phenomenon proper to living systems from the reciprocal structural coupling of at least two organisms with nervous systems, and that self-consciousness arises as an individual phenomenon from the recursive structural coupling of an organism with language with its own structure through recursive self-description.

Humberto Maturana Romesin HonFCybS

Born September 14, 1928, Dr Maturana is a Chilean biologist and philosopher, co-developer of autopoiesis as the biology of cognition and life, with affiliations to second-order cybernetics. He has collaborated with many, including particularly Francisco Varela, Ricardo B. Uribe, Ximena Dávilahis, Rolf Behnke, Gregory Bateson, Gerda Verden-Zöller (on the Biology of Love), Walter Pitts, and Oliver Lettvin. In 1954, after his first qualifications at the University of Chile, he was awarded a scholarship by the Rockefeller Foundation to study anatomy and neurophysiology at University College, London. He obtained a PhD in biology from Harvard University in 1958. In 1994 he received Chile’s National Prize for Natural Sciences. His work influenced Niklas Luhmann, Fernando Flores and Julio Olalla, and many others, not all of whom Maturana has agreed with. Gregory Bateson, asked who would continue his work, replied, “A man by the name of Humberto Maturana out of Santiago, Chile. He has been doing some very interesting research that compliments my work.” (Ruiz, 1997)

Biologist Jakob von Uexküll’s Umwelt was one of Maturana’s own inspirations. During a period of illness, he reflected and realized:

“…that what was peculiar to living systems was that they were discrete autonomous entities such that all the processes that they lived, they lived in reference to themselves … whether a dog bites me or doesn’t bite me, it is doing something that has to do with itself.”

—Ramage, Magnus, and Karen Shipp. Systems Thinkers. Milton Keynes, UK: Springer, 2009.

We are very grateful to Sebastián Gaggero for joining this meeting as a co-presenter also supporting any translation requirements. He is the present operational leader of Matritizica, which was co-founded by Humberto Maturana and Ximena Dávilahis to humanize organization in Chilean corporations. Matríztica is also interested in developing the phenomenon of learning. This involves experiencing what moves us emotionally, what triggers curiosity, in processes of self-transformation while engaging with others. It aims to provide programmes of inspiration and learning with a reflexive attitude, with awareness of our observing and acting in our co-existence… within organizations, family, schools, etc.

book at source:

Insights Series: Humberto Maturana on Autopoiesis and Cybernetics Tickets, Tue 25 May 2021 at 18:00 | Eventbrite

JRC Publications Repository: Managing complexity (and chaos) in times of crisis. A field guide for decision makers inspired by the Cynefin framework – Snowden and Alessandro (2021)

I’m pleased to say that the JRC of the EU Commission has just published a new fieldguide to managing in Complexity (and Chaos). Will be organising webinars to brief people on this next week and happy to handle any group or other requests for similar. You may agree or disagree with the underlying theory but this is significant for the wider complexity community in terms of acknowledgement

(As Dave Snowden said in the Complexity Explorers group on Facebook)

source:

JRC Publications Repository: Managing complexity (and chaos) in times of crisis. A field guide for decision makers inspired by the Cynefin framework

Managing complexity (and chaos) in times of crisis. A field guide for decision makers inspired by the Cynefin framework
Authors: SNOWDEN DAVERANCATI ALESSANDRO
Publisher: Publications Office of the European Union
Publication Year: 2021
JRC N°: JRC123629
ISBN: 978-92-76-28844-2 (online),978-92-76-28843-5 (print)
ISSN: 1831-9424 (online),1018-5593 (print)
Other Identifiers: EUR 30569 EN
OP KJ-NA-30569-EN-N (online),KJ-NA-30569-EN-C (print)
URI: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC123629
DOI: 10.2760/353
10.2760/164392
Type: Books
Abstract: This field guide helps to navigate crises using the Cynefin framework as a compass. It proposes a four-stage approach through which we can: – assess the type of crisis and initiate a response; – adapt to the new pace and start building sensing networks to inform decisions; – repurpose existing structures and working methods to generate radical innovation; – transcend the crisis, formalise lessons learnt and increase resilience. The guide stresses the importance of setting and managing boundaries, building informal structures, keeping options open, distributing engagement and keeping an ongoing assessment of the evolving landscape. Action items, real life examples and demonstrations complement the references to the developing theoretical framework.
JRC Directorate:Joint Research Centre Corporate Activities

full document in source:

JRC Publications Repository: Managing complexity (and chaos) in times of crisis. A field guide for decision makers inspired by the Cynefin framework

Legendary Physicist David Bohm on the Paradox of Communication, the Crucial Difference Between Discussion and Dialogue, and What Is Keeping Us from Listening to One Another – Brain Pickings

Another one I’m squeezing in because, although it’s probably not possible to formally call this ‘systems thinking’, it has come up so many times for me in the last week alone that I feel a need to document this very significant source of inspiratoin for so many int the community.

Brainpickings: https://www.brainpickings.org/2016/12/05/david-bohm-on-dialogue/

Dialogue – a proposal (1991) pdf https://www.humiliationstudies.org/documents/BohmDialogue.pdf

Bohmian Dialogue: A Promising Pedagogy for Transformation Learning? McBride et al (2003) pdf https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/37774232.pdf

The Art of Dialogue according to David Bohm

On the foundations of meaningful communication (2019)

https://organicstrategies.de/en/the-art-of-dialogue-according-to-david-bohm/

Wikpedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohm_Dialogue

Stafford Beer masterclass Q and A – Cybernetics, VSM (Viable System Model), Chile, Allende etc – YouTube

STAFFORD BEER masterclass Q and A – Cybernetics, VSM (Viable System Model), Chile, Allende etc – YouTube

STAFFORD BEER masterclass Q and A – Cybernetics, VSM (Viable System Model), Chile, Allende etc

Hairy Bear

Professor Stafford Beer responding to questions submitted after a masterclass in Liverpool. Unfortunately I do not know the date. This was recorded by Roger Harnden at Stafford’s cottage in Wales. I added the picture because I like it – taken at Aberaeron around 1976. “The purpose of a system is what it does.”

source:

STAFFORD BEER masterclass Q and A – Cybernetics, VSM (Viable System Model), Chile, Allende etc – YouTube

visualcomplexity.com

source:

visualcomplexity.com | About

“Functional visualizations are more than innovative statistical analyses and computational algorithms. They must make sense to the user and require a visual language system that uses colour, shape, line, hierarchy and composition to communicate clearly and appropriately, much like the alphabetic and character-based languages used worldwide between humans.”Matt Woolman
Digital Information GraphicsGoalVisualComplexity.com intends to be a unified resource space for anyone interested in the visualization of complex networks. The project’s main goal is to leverage a critical understanding of different visualization methods, across a series of disciplines, as diverse as Biology, Social Networks or the World Wide Web. I truly hope this space can inspire, motivate and enlighten any person doing research on this field.Not all projects shown here are genuine complex networks, in the sense that they aren’t necessarily at the edge of chaos, or show an irregular and systematic degree of connectivity. However, the projects that apparently skip this class were chosen for two important reasons. They either provide advancement in terms of visual depiction techniques/methods or show conceptual uniqueness and originality in the choice of a subject. Nevertheless, all projects have one trait in common: the whole is always more than the sum of its parts.

source:

visualcomplexity.com | About

Cybernetics, Computer Design, and a Meeting of the Minds – IEEE Spectrum

source:

Cybernetics, Computer Design, and a Meeting of the Minds – IEEE Spectrum

09 Feb 2021 | 14:00 GMT

Cybernetics, Computer Design, and a Meeting of the Minds

An influential 1951 conference in Paris considered the computer as a model of—and for—the human mind

By David C. Brock

LES MACHINES A CALCULER ET LA PENSEE HUMAINE; 1951
Photo-illustration: IEEE Spectrum

AdvertisementEditor’s PicksThe Brain as Computer: Bad at Math, Good at Everything ElseFirst Programmable Memristor ComputerUntold History of AI: The DARPA Dreamer Who Aimed for Cyborg Intelligence

Suggested Wiley-IEEE Reading

Dynamic Spectrum Access Decisions: Local, Distributed, Centralized, and Hybrid Designs

In Paris. Exactly seventy years ago.

continues in source:

Cybernetics, Computer Design, and a Meeting of the Minds – IEEE Spectrum

The Fractal Geometry of Nature – Benoit Mandelbrot (full book)

A ‘characterful’ scan:

Click to access a165185.pdf

CybSights Insights: “What’s my Motivation?” A cybernetic question and its dramatic enactment – YouTube

CybSights Insights: “What’s my Motivation?” A cybernetic question and its dramatic enactment – Prof Tom Scholt, Percetual Control Theory, Method of Levels

The Insights Series is an eclectic and learned collection of monthly events on the 4th Tuesday of each month hosted by the Secretary of the Cybernetics Society, Angus Jenkinson. Cybernetics is the science of design and achievement, the great fusion discipline of our time. In this session, Prof Tom Scholte, an acclaimed film and theatre director, Vice-President of the American Society for Cybernetics, and a Professor of Acting and Directing at the University of British where his centre deals with social challenges and conflicts in organisations. This business-savvy and human-centred immersive experience was a fine exploration of motivation and human behaviour through the media of drama, conversation and reflection. It also introduced the discipline of perceptual control theory (PCT), a discipline with affinities and connections to cybernetics. Discover the real nature of behaviour and how it is self- managed. Relevance to business and social practice is evident. The session was also held in association with IASCYS, the PCT network.

source:

CybSights Insights: “What’s my Motivation?” A cybernetic question and its dramatic enactment. – YouTube

Full text of Challenge to Reason by CW Churhman, 1968 – plus W. Ulrich | A Tribute to C.W. Churchman

full text of Challenge to Reason: http://www.ask-force.org/web/Discourse/Churchman-Challenge-Reason-1-223-1968.pdf

tribute on Ulrich’s page

C.W. Churchman | W. Ulrich | Ulrich’s Home Page: A Tribute to C.W. Churchman
Werner Ulrich’s Home Page:  C.W. Churchman 
    
    
  A Tribute to C. West ChurchmanC. West Churchman (ca. 1995) © A. Schultz   
    
    
HOMEWERNER ULRICH’S BIOPUBLICATIONSREADINGS ON CSHDOWNLOADSHARD COPIESCRITICAL SYSTEMS HEURISTICS (CSH)CST FOR PROFESSIONALS & CITIZENSA TRIBUTE TO C.W. CHURCHMAN –SUBPAGES:• INTRODUCTION• OBITUARY NOTICE
(25 MARCH 2004)
• AN APPRECIATION OF C.W. CHURCHMAN• A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF C.W. CHURCHMAN’S
WRITINGS, 1938-2001
• FUTURE-RESPONSIVE MANAGEMENT• IN MEMORY OF C.W. CHURCHMAN: REMINISCENCES, RETROSPECTIVES, AND REFLECTIONS (PDF)• C.W.CHURCHMAN
(1913-2004)
PICTURE OF THE MONTH
OF APRIL 2004
• CHURCHMAN’S PROCESS OF UNFOLDING [IN PREP.]LUGANO SUMMER SCHOOLULRICH’S BIMONTHLY(formerly Picture of the Month)COPYRIGHT NOTEA NOTE ON PLAGIARISMCONTACTSITE MAP 
 C. West Churchmanwas one of the founding fathers of the fields of operational research, management science (two closely connected fields often referred to as OR/MS), and the “systems approach.” Yet he also remained one of their major critics – he wanted us to remain faithful to the self-reflective, interdisciplinary and ethical spirit that stood at the beginning of OR/MS and the systems approach.West (his preferred second first name) was born in 1913. In 2003, he celebrated his 90th birthday. This tribute section of my home page originally was a modest attempt to honor my former teacher’s 90 years. After the news of his death on 21 March, 2004, it gained an unintended new significance. In remembrance of West Churchman, I would like to offer the following tribute articles.1)KEY WORDS: C.W. Churchman – biography; C.W. Churchman – bibliography; C.W. Churchman – appreciation; systems approach; systems thinking; future-responsive management; process of unfoldingC. W. Churchman (1913-2004)Obituary NoticeIn memory of West Churchman, my former teacher and mentor at the University of California, Berkeley, I offer this Tribute section of my home page. After his passing in March, 2004, two additional tribute essays were published in autumn, 2004 (see my list of publications).Copyright © 2002-2019
Suggested citation: Ulrich, W. (2002). A tribute to C. West Churchman (rev. version, 5 Nov 2015). Werner Ulrich’s home page, https://wulrich.com/cwc.html .

source:

C.W. Churchman | W. Ulrich | Ulrich’s Home Page: A Tribute to C.W. Churchman

Systems & Design Thinking: A Conceptual Framework for Their Intergration – Pourdehnad, Wexler, Wilson (2011)

source:

Systems & Design Thinking: A Conceptual Framework for Their Intergration

Systems & Design Thinking: A Conceptual Framework for Their Intergration

  • July 2011
  • This paper explores the relationship between Systems and Design Thinking. It specifically looks into the role of Design in Systems Thinking and how looking at the world through a systems lens influences Design. Our intention is to show the critical concepts developed in the Systems and Design Thinking fields, their underlying assumptions, and the ways in which they can be integrated as a cohesive conceptual framework. While there are many important distinctions that must be considered to understand the similarities and differences of these concepts, gaining a complete understanding of these factors is more than can be covered in this paper. Nevertheless, the most critical classifying variable used to distinguish these concepts will be discussed in order to make their integration possible. This variable, the recognition of purposeful behavior, will be used to develop a conceptual vision for how a combined approach can be used to research, plan, design and manage social systems…Systems in which people play the principle role.

full article in source:

Systems & Design Thinking: A Conceptual Framework for Their Intergration

a collection of collective systems facilitation and delivery techniques

A revival of an old link from model.report –

https://model.report/s/np0uvr/a_collection_of_collective_systems_facilitation_and_delivery_techniques/comments/lizbqi

Because I’m again thinking about the links and connection between the MG Taylor Method and Future Search, and Beer’s Team Syntegrity, and indeed Tavistock and Trist and Jacuqes and post-WW2 army leader selection.

Anyway, some more collective/large group facilitation links:

ART OR ARTIST? AN ANALYSIS OF EIGHT LARGE-GROUP METHODS FOR DRIVING LARGE-SCALE CHANGE
Svetlana Shmulyian, Barry Bateman, Ruth G. Philpott and Neelu K. Gulri

Click to access add8f9b084b526100166a6971c0fbfa8bd15.pdf

(covers: AmericaSpeaks, Appreciative Inquiry, Conference Models, Decision Accelerator, Future Search, Participative Design, Strategic Change Accelerator/ACT (IBM), and Whole-Scalet Change)

US Patent application (2001, abandoned) for “System and method for augmenting knowledge commerce” – Matt and Gail Taylor
A system and method for addressing the paradoxes and problems associated with the Knowledge Economy, and the transition to it. The system and method of the present invention create a unified experience of work that scales from individual thought processes to the building and using of a global system of commerce. Described in several levels of recursion, the system and method of the present invention integrate, into a single system and method several discrete Sub-Systems and methods that comprise a myriad of now unintegrated tools and processes that are conducted across contradictory and non-collaborative environments.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20040006566A1/en
(pdf) https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/11/a8/0b/73254778a0bb42/US20040006566A1.pdf

D5.1 Plan for Innovation Procedures in ROADIDEA (bear with me!) – part of a European funded project (5 million euros?!) to study the potential of the European transport service sector for innovations, to analyse available data sources, to reveal existing problems and bottlenecks, and to develop better methods and models to be utilized in service platforms. These were to be capable of providing new, innovative transport services for various transport user groups, while trialling a formal innovation process to achieve this. The central issue was the Innovation Process itself and its value in undertaking this important task. (Overview https://trimis.ec.europa.eu/project/road-map-radical-innovations-european-transport-services#tab-outline)
This is the innovation process: https://cordis.europa.eu/docs/projects/cnect/5/215455/080/deliverables/ROADIDEA-D5-1-Innovation-Plan-V1-1.pdf

‘Comprehensive review of collaboration technologies’ (it’s not): http://www.collaborationlabs.net/index.html

Dee Brook – Towards a practice of collaborative sustainable innovation design – foresight enhancement and the designshop process
Submitted to OCAD University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Design in STRATEGIC FORESIGHT AND INNOVATION Toronto, Ontario, Canada, April, 2019

Click to access Brooks_Dee_2019_MDES_SFI_MRP.pdf

Redesigning Our Theories of Theories of Change, Peter H Jones + Ryan J A Murphy (ST-ON 2020/11/19) – Coevolving Innovations

source:

Redesigning Our Theories of Theories of Change, Peter H Jones + Ryan J A Murphy (ST-ON 2020/11/19) – Coevolving Innovations

Redesigning Our Theories of Theories of Change, Peter H Jones + Ryan J A Murphy (ST-ON 2020/11/19)

 February 5, 2021  daviding 0 Comments

While the term “theory of change” is often used by funders expecting an outcome of systems change for their investment, is there really a theory there?

The November 2020 Systems Thinking Ontario session was an opportunity for Peter H. Jones (OCADU) and Ryan J. A. Murphy (Memorial U. of Newfoundland) to extend talks that they had given over a few days for the Relating Systems Thinking and Design (RSD9) Symposium.

The talks covered some early research and conversation on deepening the understanding of “theories of change”.  After our usual round of self-introductions by meeting attendees, the core content starts in the web video recording after 12m45s.

The video file is also viewable and downloadable at the Internet Archive,

VideoH.264 MP4
November 9
(1h56m)
[20201109_ST-ON_Jones_Murphy_TheoriesOfTheoriesOfChange.m4v]
(FHD 203kbps 276MB) [on archive.org]

The digital audio was extracted from the video, and transcoded to MP3.

Audio
November 9
(1h56m)
[20201109_ST-ON_Jones_Murphy_TheoriesOfTheoriesOfChange.mp3]
(40MB) [on archive.org]

Here is the original abstract from the Systems Thinking Ontario November 9, 2020, session.

— begin paste —

Redesigning Our Theories of Theories of Change

Peter Jones presents a customized talk from the RSD9 plenary session for ST ON. Ryan Murphy joins with a full presentation of his RSD9 talk.

We often use the model of “theories of change” to argue for the process by which envisioned change programs might achieve their goals. Essentially these are the working theories by which we explain the logic of system change outcomes, and we often include quasi-systemic logic models to communicate them. ToCs are as ubiquitous in social innovation and philanthropy as business models are in startups and VCs. “Systems change” has emerged as a major movement in the worlds of impact investing, philanthropy, and the NGOs they fund, and the proposals expected to advance studies and change programs embrace the language of the theory of change.

  • Do Theories of Change reflect coherent models of change that we can observe or assess in real social systems? If so, are logic models sufficient (do they correspond to reality)?
  • How do we Represent Transformation? Framework of four Sensemaking Logics
  • What are the meanings, purposes, effectiveness, basis in systemics, their common applications, uses and misuses of Theories of Change?
  • Can we produce better theories for change through systemic design rationale

Suggested pre-reading:

source:

Redesigning Our Theories of Theories of Change, Peter H Jones + Ryan J A Murphy (ST-ON 2020/11/19) – Coevolving Innovations

Gregory Bateson, Ecology of Mind and Double Binds – Nora Bateson on YouTube (2012)

source:

Gregory Bateson, Ecology of Mind and Double Binds – YouTube

Gregory Bateson, Ecology of Mind and Double Binds 458 views•1 Dec 2020 6 0 SHARE SAVE jude lombardi 264 subscribers SUBSCRIBED Two excerpts from the 2012 American Society for Cybernetics. One by Nora Bateson on the Ecology of Ideas and the other one man’s story about his experience with a Double Bind.

Gregory Bateson, Ecology of Mind and Double Binds – YouTube