When Unfreeze-Move-Refreeze Isn’t Working: Doing, Thinking and Making Via Systems Changes Learning | David Ing, and Systems Leadership, Change, Theory and Practice | Benjamin P Taylor – at SCiO

When Unfreeze-Move-Refreeze Isn’t Working: Doing, Thinking and Making Via Systems Changes LearningDavid Ing12 July 2022

When Unfreeze-Move-Refreeze Isn’t Working: Doing, Thinking and Making Via Systems Changes Learning | SCiO

Systems Leadership, Change, Theory and PracticeBenjamin Taylor11 July 2022

Systems Leadership, Change, Theory and Practice | SCiO

On Cybernetics / Stafford Beer – YouTube

On Cybernetics / Stafford Beer

On Cybernetics / Stafford Beer – YouTube

Introduction to Cybernetics – Interintellect with Scott Davies, Saturday August 13 10:30am ACST

Introduction to Cybernetics

Saturday August 13 at 10:30 am – 12:30 pm ACST $15

Introduction to Cybernetics – Interintellect

Introduction to Cybernetics

Saturday August 13 at 10:30 am – 12:30 pm ACST

Start time where you are: Saturday August 13 – 2:00 AM

$15.00

Join Scott Davies for a salon on cybernetics from its foundations to present.

Cybernetics is, according to one of its pioneers, Norbert Wiener, concerned with “Control and communication in the animal and the machine.” Cybernetics is, as its core, the study of feedback models in social and biological systems. While most closely related to systems theory, AI and complexity science, cybernetics can be applied to all manner of topics as varied as biology, economics, management theory and even architecture and the arts.

In this Salon, returning host Scott Davies will provide an introduction and overview to a field of study which is often misunderstood and at times maligned as a result. Starting from its origins in the middle of the twentieth century with Norbert Weiner and the legendary Macy Conferences, through the field’s heyday in the 1960s and 1970s, this Salon will explore the field’s development up to the present day. We’ll discuss the field’s relevance in the modern day and whether this field of study can help provide insight and perspective to the challenges of our day.

Application of Systems Thinking to Health Policy & Public Health Ethics | Battle-Fisher

Application of Systems Thinking to Health Policy & Public Health Ethics

Application of Systems Thinking to Health Policy & Public Health Ethics | SpringerLink

Application of Systems Thinking to Health Policy & Public Health Ethics

Public Health and Private Illness

Authors:

  • Explores health policy through the lens of public health vs. private health
  • Popular, cultural examples and nontechnical tone make political philosophy and health policy topics accessible to a student audience
  • Applies systems and complexity thinking to health system reform
  • Includes supplementary material: sn.pub/extras

See also

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321616057_Application_of_Systems_Thinking_to_Health_Policy_Public_Health_Ethics_Public_Health_and_Private_Illness

and

Conway’s Game of Life: Mathematics and Construction

cxdig's avatarComplexity Digest

Nathaniel Johnston and Dave Greene

This book provides an introduction to Conway’s Game of Life, the
interesting mathematics behind it, and the methods used to construct
many of its most interesting patterns. Lots of small “building
block”-style patterns (especially in the first four or so chapters of
this book) were found via brute-force or other computer searches, and
the book does not go into the details of how these searches were
implemented. However, from that point on it tries to guide the reader
through the thought processes and ideas that are needed to combine
those patterns into more interesting composite ones.

While the book largely follows the history of the Game of Life, that
is not its primary purpose. Rather, it is a by-product of the fact
that most recently discovered patterns build upon patterns and
techniques that were developed earlier. The goal of this book is to
demystify the…

View original post 26 more words

Biological Robots: Perspectives on an Emerging Interdisciplinary Field

cxdig's avatarComplexity Digest

Biological Robots: Perspectives on an Emerging Interdisciplinary Field
D. Blackiston, S. Kriegman, J. Bongard, M. Levin
Advances in science and engineering often reveal the limitations of classical approaches initially used to understand, predict, and control phenomena. With progress, conceptual categories must often be re-evaluated to better track recently discovered invariants across disciplines. It is essential to refine frameworks and resolve conflicting boundaries between disciplines such that they better facilitate, not restrict, experimental approaches and capabilities. In this essay, we discuss issues at the intersection of developmental biology, computer science, and robotics. In the context of biological robots, we explore changes across concepts and previously distinct fields that are driven by recent advances in materials, information, and life sciences. Herein, each author provides their own perspective on the subject, framed by their own disciplinary training. We argue that as with computation, certain aspects of developmental biology and robotics are not tied…

View original post 57 more words

Touching the elephant

#TIL than in 1998, some absolute MAD LADS at the BBC organised for some blind people to touch an elephant 😀
BBC Radio 4 Extra – 90 by 90 The Full Set, 1998: Touching The Elephant
https://bbc.in/3PqNeYA

Also on YouTube:
https://bit.ly/3O6bo9J

What were the connections between ‘systems thinking’ and Nazism?

See this tweet and replies from Paul Nightingale

includes:
“The early ones were literally Nazis who were interned after the war. Concepts like Fuhrer-prinzip had to be cleaned up for US audiences.”
“Cybernetics is later. Systems theory emerged in 1930s Germany, Bertalanffy was in the Nazi party.”
“The pre war categories were often racial, while the post war US work was actively trying to purge all racial and biological characteristics from their conceptions of human agents. Which is why they are often so abstract.”

CSRP Institute – Creative Systemic Research Platform

Creative Systemic Research Platform Instituteis an institution aiming to promote research and development of non-profit projects. We focus on investigating the skills needed for Community Resilience, supported by ecological practices and systemic and creative learning.Existing since 2017 as a non-profit research group, we evolved in December 2020 into the CSRP Institute.

CSRP Institute – Creative Systemic Research Platform

What do ‘systems leadership’ and ‘systems change ‘ mean to you? What questions would you like me to answer?

antlerboy - Benjamin P Taylor's avatarchosen path

I’m talking about them at the free SCiO — Systems and Complexity in Organisation evening session tonight (18:30–20:30 UK time), and I’m sharing the session with David Ing who is four years into a ten-year ‘systems changes’ journey.

Session info:

SCiO Virtual Open Meeting – July 2022
Virtual Open Meeting: A series of presentations of general interest to Systems and Complexity in Organisation’s members…www.scio.org.uk

You may also like our session with Carbon Capture folk as part of The Systems Change Alliance on July 20:

There are many approaches and a lot of words wasted about these topics. Some of it is really good, some of it is risible, and much has little to do with systems thinking or systems practice.

‘Systems Leadership’ can mean anything from systems thinking-informed traditional #leadership to better leadership of an organised set of institutions — like a ‘healthcare system’, to…

View original post 135 more words

Systems Mapping | How to build and use causal models of systems – Barbook-Johnson and Penn

Systems MappingHow to build and use causal models of systems

Systems Mapping | SpringerLink

Systems Mapping

How to build and use causal models of systems

Authors:

 (view affiliations

  • Pete Barbrook-Johnson, 
  • Alexandra S. Penn
  • Provides a practical and in-depth discussion of causal systems mapping methods
  • Provides guidance on running systems mapping workshops and using different types of data and evidence
  • Orientates readers to the systems mapping landscape and explores how we can compare, choose, and combine methods
  • This book is open access, which means that you have free and unlimited access

David Ing, “Systems Changes Learning: Recasting and reifying rhythmic shifts for doing, alongside thinking and making”, The Journal of Sustainable Smart Behavior , August 2022, in press

David Ing, “Systems Changes Learning: Recasting and reifying rhythmic shifts for doing, alongside thinking and making”, The Journal of Sustaiable Smart Behavior , August 2022, in press

2022/07 Systems Changes Learning: Recasting and reifying rhythmic shifts for doing, alongside thinking and making | Coevolving Innovations

2022/07 Systems Changes Learning: Recasting and reifying rhythmic shifts for doing, alongside thinking and making

 24th Jun 2022

Authors

David Ing

Abstract

In 2022, the Systems Changes Learning Circle is in its fourth year of 10-year journey on “Rethinking Systems Thinking”. In a contextural action learning approach, the Circle has elevated rhythmic shifts as the feature that both resonates with practitioners in the field, and fits with a post-colonial philosophy of science bridging classical Chinese thought with Western professional practices. This multiparadigm inquiry recasts and reifies the activities of doing (praxis), thinking (theoria) and making (poiesis). The facility with this approach is deepened through three levels: (i) educating of attention, orienting novices towards contrasting modes of thought; (ii) learning for co-relating, lending a way for practitioners to critically appreciate their situations, and (iii) learning for articulating, aiding mentors to guide groups productively through mutual learning.

Citation

David Ing, “Systems Changes Learning: Recasting and reifying rhythmic shifts for doing, alongside thinking and making”, The Journal of Sustaiable Smart Behavior , August 2022, in press

2022/07/08 Appreciating Systems Changes | Coevolving Innovations

Is the subject of systems change(s), as a whole, distinct from a reduction into (i) systems and (ii) changes? For practice, theory and methods to be authentically rigourous, the philosophy underlying an approach to systems changes can be explicated. An appreciative systems framework surfaces presumptions of (i) what are and are not systems changes; (ii) when, where, and for whom, systems changes are prioritized for attention; and (iii) how systems changes should be addressed. Philosophies of (i) architectural design; (ii) ecological anthropology, and (iii) Classical Chinese Medicine are explored through multiparadigm inquiry, and open theorizing. The resulting influence of these three philosophies is considered, leading to a philosophy of systems rhythms more explicitly proposed as a foundation on which to approach systems changes.

2022/07/08 Appreciating Systems Changes | Coevolving Innovations

Kenneth Stanley: Why Greatness Cannot Be Planned: The Myth of the Objective – YouTube

Kenneth Stanley: Why Greatness Cannot Be Planned: The Myth of the Objective

Why Greatness Cannot Be Planned: The Myth of the Objective Kenneth O. Stanley, Associate Professor, University of Central Florida In artificial intelligence and elsewhere, it has long been assumed that the best way to achieve an ambitious outcome is to set it as an explicit objective and then to measure progress on the road to its achievement. Upending this conventional wisdom, a series of unusual experiments in machine learning has shown that, for a broad class of outcomes, the very act of setting objectives can block their achievement. More fundamentally, the same so-called “objective paradox” applies not only in computer algorithms but across many human endeavors: Often, to achieve our highest aspirations, we must be willing to abandon them. As a corollary, collaboration can sometimes thwart innovation by tacitly forcing its participants into an objective-driven mindset. The moral is both sobering and liberating: We can potentially achieve more by following a non-objective yet still principled path, after throwing off the shackles of objectives, metrics, and mandated outcomes.

Kenneth Stanley: Why Greatness Cannot Be Planned: The Myth of the Objective – YouTube

h/t Toby Lowe https://twitter.com/tobyjlowe/status/1544662634808713218

Home – The Liminal Learning Portal

Our global civilization faces multiple systemic threats.The inevitable deeply disruptive transition will lead…EITHER to untold pain and suffering – via chaosOR (maybe) to a New Era – via conscious evolution.On this site, we curate the content of some of the people and organizations who are consciously working directly or indirectly on Humanity’s Transition.Watch the video to learn more, and please Support Us if you can.Explore.   Learn.   Inform your decisions.

Home – The Liminal Learning Portal