Collective decision-making in living and artificial systems: editorial

cxdig's avatarComplexity Digest

Special issue on “Collective decision-making in living and artificial systems”
Swarm Intelligence, volume 15, issue 1–2 (2021)
Edited by A. Reina, E. Ferrante & G. Valentini

Collective decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process required for group coordination. Typically, this process requires individuals in a group to either reach a consensus on one of several available options or to distribute their workforce over different tasks. Similar collective decision-making processes can be found in a large number of systems, motivating a vast modeling effort across scientific disciplines. It can be observed across scales in a variety of animal groups, from unicellular organisms, to social insects, fish schools, and groups of mammals. In the social sciences, scientific domains such as econophysics and sociophysics emerged to investigate collective decisions in humans, deepening our understanding of the dynamics of economies and social policies. Neuroscientists also look at brains as a collection of neurons that, through…

View original post 89 more words

Polycentric governance and the Ostroms’ thinking

Linking to https://stream.syscoi.com/2021/05/23/polycentricity-gerhard-guenther-and-more/ and the way in which everyone, these days, is seeking polycentric organisations (to some degree, and whether they know it or not)


Co-Production, Polycentricity and Value Heterogeneity: The Ostroms’ Public Choice Institutionalism Revisited – Tarko and Aligicia (2013)

https://www.academia.edu/5648350/Co_Production_Polycentricity_and_Value_Heterogeneity_The_Ostroms_Public_Choice_Institutionalism_Revisited?email_work_card=view-paper


An Introduction to Polycentricity and Governance – Mark Stephan, Graham Marshall, and Michael McGinnis (2019)


Principle seven of GRAID at Stockholm Resilience Centre – promote polycentric governance

Intellectual Fascia

Cybernetics is not the banana.

antlerboy - Benjamin P Taylor's avatarchosen path

not the banana

Wat?

What are we offering the world?

Imagine a chimp in a cage. In this cage is a banana on top of a large shelf, out of reach for the chimp. However, there is also a stick in the cage. Of course, the chimp will manage to get the banana using the stick.
To this story, von Foerster said: cybernetics is not about the banana.

Ask yourself – what am I offering my clients? As a consultant, as a company, as a trainer, as a teacher…

  • Am I offering them the banana? Tasty, juicy, sweet, addictive – but just one banana.
  • Or the stick? Very hand in specific situations where the banana is on a high shelf.
    As the joke says – teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat and drink beer all day.
  • Am I offering them the shelf, bananas for the…

View original post 352 more words

‘Social’ Mitochondria, Whispering Between Cells, Influence Health

cxdig's avatarComplexity Digest

Mitochondria appear to communicate and cooperate with one another, both within and between cells. Biologists are only just beginning to understand how and why.

Read the full article at: www.quantamagazine.org

View original post

Friston’s Free Energy Principle Explained (part 1) | jared tumiel

Friston’s Free Energy Principle Explained (part 1)

Friston’s Free Energy Principle Explained (part 1) | jared tumiel

Absorptive capacity – Wikipedia

Absorptive capacity

Absorptive capacity – Wikipedia

Absorptive capacity

In business administrationabsorptive capacity has been defined as “a firm’s ability to recognize the value of new information, assimilate it, and apply it to commercial ends”. It is studied on individual, group, firm, and national levels. Antecedents are prior-based knowledge (knowledge stocks and knowledge flows) and communication. Studies involve a firm’s innovation performance, aspiration level, and organizational learning. It has been said that in order to be innovative an organization should develop its absorptive capacity.

A Frame for Deframing in Strategic Analysis | Dunbar et al (1996)

A Frame for Deframing in Strategic Analysis R. Dunbar, R. Garud, S. Raghuram Published 1996 Computer Science Journal of Management Inquiry Deframing processes are needed to deal with pervasive change. We describe what is meant by a frame and how strategy analysts develop and rely on frames to help their understanding. We also discuss the limitations of frames and the need in a changing world for people to be able to both frame and deframe to facilitate their understanding. We then present a frame for understanding the deframing process. 

[PDF] A Frame for Deframing in Strategic Analysis | Semantic Scholar

A Frame for Deframing in Strategic Analysis

Deframing processes are needed to deal with pervasive change. We describe what is meant by a frame and how strategy analysts develop and rely on frames to help their understanding. We also discuss the limitations of frames and the need in a changing world for people to be able to both frame and deframe to facilitate their understanding. We then present a frame for understanding the deframing process. 

The Cybernetics of Magic and the Magic of Cybernetics:

Harish's avatarHarish's Notebook - My notes... Lean, Cybernetics, Quality & Data Science.

In today’s post, I am looking at magic and cybernetics. From a young age, I have been a fan of magic. I have talked about magic here before. I see magic as the art of paradoxes. The word paradox stems from the Greek words – “para” and “dokein”, and taken together it means contrary to expectation.

Take for example a simple magic trick where the magician shows you an open empty hand. The magician closes the hand, and does a gentle wiggle and then opens his hand to reveal a coin. He again closes his hands, and does another gentle wiggle and then opens the hand to show that his hand is empty. The magic happens from a self-referential operation. The spectator (or the observer) sees an empty hand and describes it to themselves as an empty hand. Later, when the magician shows their hand again, the hand now…

View original post 803 more words

Full article: Exploring the challenges of system leadership in the voluntary and community sector – Moss (2020)

Exploring the challenges of system leadership in the voluntary and community sector Stephen Moss

Full article: Exploring the challenges of system leadership in the voluntary and community sector

Exploring the challenges of system leadership in the voluntary and community sector

Stephen MossPages 125-137 | Received 23 Aug 2019, Accepted 03 Dec 2019, Published online: 23 Jan 2020

ABSTRACT

LankellyChase Foundation works to bring about change that will transform the quality of life of people who face severe and multiple disadvantage. It set up the ‘Promoting Change Network’ (PCN) to foster learning, and to support 40 or so organisations which receive funding from the Foundation. This was in recognition of the challenges they face in their work to alleviate severe and multiple disadvantages – combinations of problems around homelessness, substance abuse, mental health, domestic violence and abuse, and chronic poverty. Action learning was a supportive intervention commissioned by LankellyChase for PCN grantees, covering London and the North of England/Glasgow. Two Action Learning Sets met five and six times respectively between November 2014 and July 2015. The Sets demonstrated the importance and value of standing back and questioning your approach – when you are part of the (complex) health and care system you are aiming to change.

Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science

cxdig's avatarComplexity Digest

Jake M. Hofman, Duncan J. Watts, Susan Athey, Filiz Garip, Thomas L. Griffiths, Jon Kleinberg, Helen Margetts, Sendhil Mullainathan, Matthew J. Salganik, Simine Vazire, Alessandro Vespignani & Tal Yarkoni
Nature (2021)

Computational social science is more than just large repositories of digital data and the computational methods needed to construct and analyse them. It also represents a convergence of different fields with different ways of thinking about and doing science. The goal of this Perspective is to provide some clarity around how these approaches differ from one another and to propose how they might be productively integrated. Towards this end we make two contributions. The first is a schema for thinking about research activities along two dimensions—the extent to which work is explanatory, focusing on identifying and estimating causal effects, and the degree of consideration given to testing predictions of outcomes—and how these two priorities can complement, rather than compete…

View original post 42 more words

‘Red Hamlet: The Life and Ideas of Alexander Bogdanov’ by James D White,’Empiriomonism: Essays in Philosophy, Books 1-3′ by Alexander Bogdanov reviewed by Nicholas Bujalski – Marx & Philosophy Society

Marx & Philosophy Review of BooksReviews‘Red Hamlet: The Life and Ideas of Alexander Bogdanov’ by James D White,’Empiriomonism: Essays in Philosophy, Books 1-3′ by Alexander Bogdanov reviewed by Nicholas Bujalski

‘Red Hamlet: The Life and Ideas of Alexander Bogdanov’ by James D White,’Empiriomonism: Essays in Philosophy, Books 1-3′ by Alexander Bogdanov reviewed by Nicholas Bujalski – Marx & Philosophy Society

James D White
Red Hamlet: The Life and Ideas of Alexander Bogdanov

Brill, Leiden and Boston, 2018. 494 pp., €170.00 hb
ISBN 9789004268906

Alexander Bogdanov
Empiriomonism: Essays in Philosophy, Books 1-3

David G. Rowley (ed. and trans.), Brill, Leiden and Boston, 2020. 450 pp., €165.00 hb
ISBN 9789004300315

Reviewed by Nicholas Bujalski

An essay about cybernetics and slime molds courtesy TektologicⒶl҉ – Serendipity on Twitter

Macy conferences – Alchetron, The Free Social Encyclopedia

Macy conferences

Macy conferences – Alchetron, The Free Social Encyclopedia

The Power of Systems – How Policy Sciences Opened Up the Cold War World – Egle Rindzeviciute (2016) – full book

The Power of Systems

The Power of Systems

The Power of Systems

How Policy Sciences Opened Up the Cold War World

Thumbnail

 Download

Rindzeviciute, Egle
Language

EnglishShow full item recordThe International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), an international think tank established jointly by the United States and Soviet Union in Austria in 1972, was intended to advance scientific collaboration. Until the late 1980s, the IIASA was one of the very few permanent sites where policy scientists from both sides of the Iron Curtain could work together to articulate and solve world problems, most notably global climate change. One of the best-kept secrets of the Cold War, this think tank was a rare zone of freedom, communication, and negotiation, where leading Soviet scientists could try out their innovative ideas, benefit from access to Western literature, and develop social networks, thus paving the way for some of the key science and policy breakthroughs of the twentieth century.