Category Archives: Discussion
A view or perspective on the world
Are Systems Changes Different from System + Change? – Coevolving Innovations
A series of pieces on coevolving.com from January-March of this year, which I’ll be linking out one per week (but all are on David Ing’s blog already). Here is 2/5
via Are Systems Changes Different from System + Change? – Coevolving Innovations
Are Systems Changes Different from System + Change?
The Systems Changes Learning Circle has met at least every 3 weeks over the past year. As part of an hour+ lecture to introduce systems thinking, students in the Systemic Design course in the Master’s program in Strategic Foresight and Innovation at OCAD Universitywere immersed in questions where we’ve focused our attention, complemented by background into traditional foundational materials. An audio recording has now been matched up with presentation slides, so that learners outside the classroom can partially share in the experience.
This lecture begins with the rising interest in “systems change”, that is related to “theory of change” from funders of social innovation programs. From there, the lecture aims to recast (speak in a different way) and reify (make some specified ideas more prominent) an understanding of systems thinking.
The presentation was overprepared — we can’t predict how engaged students will be on the ideas, before their brains are full. Of 55 slides, we stopped on slide 37. For streaming, the video is accessible on Youtube. (with a 6-minute excerpt on the Luoyang Bay abalone farmsfrom the documentary Watermark, by Edward Burtynsky, removed).
continues in source Are Systems Changes Different from System + Change? – Coevolving Innovations
slides etc also at http://coevolving.com/commons/20200115-ocadu-systems-changes-different-from
Permaculture ‘Zones’
People who know permaculture and related disciplines will laugh, but I can’t believe I am only now discovering the ‘permaculture zones’.
Essentially, you zone your land and the things you want instantly, fresh, and to interact with daily are closest, with the furthest zone being ‘wilderness’, where you might forage or seek inspiration. There are so many obvious parallels and examples – pacing layers, authority/influence, and the boundaries and mix of chaos and order, to take some of the most obvious. Very interesting and worth thinking about in some depth.
(And/but… isn’t it interesting that it’s so… structural?)
via Zoning | Permaculture Association
via Property Planning with Permaculture Zones | Southern Exposure Seed Exchange
via The Permaculture Research Institute
via Permaculture Zones – Growing Zones In A Permaculture Design
and one immediate example of using this as a template/metaphor/concept map:
via Design the regenerative city Using zones and sectors in an urban permaculture design
Systems convening – ongoing discussion for development of a handbook | Wenger-Trayner
via Systems convening | Wenger-Trayner
LEADERSHIP FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
SYSTEMS CONVENING
WEBINAR
Wednesday, January 15 2020 – 3 – 4 p.m. (UK time)
Sponsored by Lankelly Chase
WORKSHOP
October 8 – 9, 2020
Sesimbra, Portugal
ONGOING CONVERSATION
Join an email discussion to share your experience of convening and the tools and frameworks that would be useful for you. These discussions will inform a handbook for systems conveners.
A HANDBOOK
We are in the initial stages of preparing a book for systems conveners to be published in 2020.

Systems conveners
Increasingly we find people taking leadership in enabling learning across complex social landscapes, with multiple practices, institutions, interests, and significant boundaries. We call them systems conveners. This leadership can happen at any level of scale from organizing an encounter across a boundary to bringing together multiple players across a complex system to address a challenge that no single player can address. The role and practice of these systems conveners is still often invisible and misunderstood. Organizations often fail to recognize and support this kind of work even though most significant problems today call for bringing multiple players to the table to be able to address them in creative and sustainable ways.
More on systems conveners in this book: Learning in landscapes of practice: Boundaries, identities, and knowledgeability in practice based learning (2014).
via Systems convening | Wenger-Trayner
Illuminate: Cultivating the field and practice of systems change – sign up now for news… soon :-)
From climate change to the coronavirus, complex adaptive systems thinking is key to handling crises | South China Morning Post
Resources for decentralised organising – HackMD
John T. Lyle and the Future of Regenerative Design | The Don B. Huntley Gallery | College of Environmental Design – Cal Poly Pomona
h/t David Ing – some of the roots of the regenerative design movement
Architecture, Data and Intelligence: Data Strategy – More on Agility – Richard Veryard
Richard’s blogs are all worth reading – and this series on data is deeply systems thinking…
via Architecture, Data and Intelligence: Data Strategy – More on Agility
Eight grand challenges in socio-environmental systems modeling | Integration and Implementation Insights
Eight grand challenges in socio-environmental systems modeling
By Sondoss Elsawah and Anthony J. Jakeman
Cosma Shalizi on Twitter: “Of the Evaluation of Expertise (“I am not so good for that as an old roofer”) https://t.co/FXSnTJ4iF5″ / Twitter (and me on ‘medication adherence’)
This brilliant blog post using a conversational form to query prediction, expertise, practical action, and our expectations and ‘rationality’ around it was retweeted by David Chapman: http://bactra.org/weblog/1174.html
That led to me sharing one of my favourite little canters about ‘medication adherence’, cut-and-paste here as much for my own convenience as anything else:
‘Medication adherence’ is brilliant for this. I’ve seen (but can never find) a paper which puts the number of people who – fill the prescription and – take the medicine – in the recommended way – to the recommended course to be in the teen%s.
and this is with *every aspect of the symbolism of General Practitioners reflecting courtly ritual of time spent visiting the Monarch*! (Ooh – and you have to factor in the %age doctors got the right medication and wrote it down correctly, and legibly)
and the literature seems… thin… and vague… There’s a suspiciously round figure of 50% reported a lot ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P and there seem to be few really predictive factors ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P
“40-60% of patients could not correctly report what their physicians expected of them 10-80 minutes after they were provided with the information.” “over 60% of patients interviewed immediately after visiting their doctors misunderstood the directions”
This literature review suggests lack of good knowledge medscape.com/viewarticle/51 This pertains *even in RCTs* uspharmacist.com/article/medica
and what tickles me even more is that data collection in adherence monitoring is vague, varied, and unreliable frontiersin.org/articles/10.33 …so if you want nebulosity in medicine, it’s here in layers – it might *look like* we know what we don’t know… but we’re not sure!
Uncomfortable with uncertainty – Garath Symonds on LinkedIn
(interest: Garath is a friend and sometime collaborator)
via Uncomfortable with uncertainty | LinkedIn
Uncomfortable with uncertainty
A few years ago I went to a job interview and was asked a question about how I deal with uncertainty. In my answer I described myself as someone who is ‘comfortable with uncertainty’. At the time I had recently completed an executive education programme on systems leadership where we considered the idea of a VUCA world. VUCA being a term first coined by the US military and stands for volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous. The term VUCA has now become something of a cliche, and for good reason as it perfectly describes the modern operating context not just for the military, but for public services, not-for-profits and the commercial sector.
The same programme focussed on the idea of Adaptive Leadership, developed at Harvard Kennedy School of Government, as the profound social technology to lead in uncertain times. This learning experience helped me give what sounded like a well informed answer at interview. I also believed it to be true, I believed that I was ‘comfortable with uncertainty’ and that adaptive leaders have this capability. My answer convinced the interviewer and I got the job.
Today I know uncertainty triggers anxiety for me and is something I have to work on. How then did I convince myself of the opposite? My answer for myself is that I had heard that this was how leaders were supposed to be and I believed it. It became part of a ‘story’ that I told myself and I clung onto it. Often these story lines can get in the way of our leadership; I was unconsciously lying to myself because it fitted a model that I had imagined about how leaders should be.
Denying anxiety as I did, may only put the day of overwhelm off. Through coaching and work on myself I have noticed the role anxiety plays in my psychology and how it is often triggered by uncertainty. My habit, developed over a lifetime, was to push this emotion away and to tough it out. This wasn’t something that started in my leadership career, its origins were much earlier. My own experience of being a coach has shown me that I’m not the only one, our past presents in the moment for all of us. The challenge is to become increasingly aware of how old habits impact on how we lead today.
One senior leader I worked with would do anything to avoid conflict, he oscillated between trying to please everyone and taking an authoritarian style that closed conflict down abruptly and often aggressively. In coaching I asked about his experience of his family of origin – he described a childhood characterised by continual conflict. He was eventually able to link this experience to what was happening today, noting the feelings of uncertainty and insecurity that conflict provoked and how the same tapes were still being played out.
Becoming aware of this unconscious process allowed the leader to see it happening and grow in the capacity to change. Seeing it means you don’t have to be it. For me, this is what leading with awareness means; working on your blind spots and making them conscious. This work involves observing yourself with objectivity, without the normal judgements we make when we notice something we don’t like about ourselves.
This is very similar to an adaptive leadership practice known as ‘balcony work’. When an adaptive leader ‘gets on the balcony’ they view the ‘dance floor’ (system) observing what is happening and working out what intervention to make. The difference is that the system here is your inner-system and its about what is going on interiorly, your thoughts, feelings and sensations. Cultivating this ‘noticing practice’ supports us to be in uncertain situations, seeing and even dropping our unhelpful storylines.
My storyline was: ‘I’m comfortable with uncertainty’ and this created a blindspot that prevented me seeing what was really happening. It made it harder for me to be comfortable with who I am (an ordinary person who dislikes uncertainty and is continually looking for solid ground). My insistence on clinging to this idea resulted in me pushing my emotions away and I avoided working with my anxiety.
Freud saw anxiety as a signal to the ego of a potential threat. These signals are received physiologically by the amygdala, which resides in our ancient limbic brain and is associated with our fight, flight or freeze instinct. Many situations can activate this instinct: change, uncertainty, loss, rejection and fear of failure – all of which might characterise our current context as we move from one adaptive challenge to the next (remember Brexit?).
In the context of organisational leadership it’s no longer threat of physical attack, but rather a threat to our ego, perhaps our status, our model of ourselves, the story we tell. It may be that your story is getting in the way of your ability to connect with others, to lead.
The Covid19 pandemic is going to tragically affect so many families. Things we once took for granted are now under threat; our health, jobs, and businesses, potentially creating a pandemic of anxiety. This crisis might be inviting us to view our experience differently, put some space between us and our experience so we can see what is going on more clearly, pause and reflect on what to do.
This shock to our system may have some adaptive results, the need to reduce air travel and car use has been immediately achieved – for a time at least. A new global narrative has started to emerge similar to that of people who get a health scare and then reflect: ‘I might need to re-think my lifestyle…’ How we sustainably adapt as a global community remains to be seen, our personal adaptions in the face of uncertainty and anxiety are something we can all take responsibility for.
Garath Symonds is a Executive Coach, learn more at www.garathsymondscoaching.com
Deeper than hair discrimination: A movement to address and dismantle systemic racism – NetworkWeaver
via Deeper than hair discrimination: A movement to address and dismantle systemic racism – NetworkWeaver
When I graduated from Columbia University, I was informed in a professional development workshop at a national conference that my hair should not distract from my excellent credentials. I did not understand how hair that grew naturally out of my scalp could be labelled as a source of barriers. The styles that were mentioned as socially acceptable for professional upward mobility were straight hairstyles that did not reflect the texture of my natural hair.
Continues in source: Deeper than hair discrimination: A movement to address and dismantle systemic racism – NetworkWeaver
Leading Through the Pandemic: Lessons for the NHS
a bit of Keith Grint 🙂
Prof Becky Malby interviews thought leaders to inform and guide NHS leaders through the current context.
The first interview is with Keith Grint, Emeritus Professor at Warwick University on the lessons from his work on leading Critical, Tame and Wicked Problems. We discuss the interplay between command and control and adaptive leadership, the role of soft power, and how to ensure as leaders are the best decision-maker you can be.
The Invitation | Barry Lopez | Granta Magazine – From a great tweet-starter by Thea Snow – ‘systems thinking comes naturally in oral cultures but is v difficult in literary cultures’
From a great tweet-starter by Thea Snow – ‘systems thinking comes naturally in oral cultures but is v difficult in literary cultures’ – discuss!
via The Invitation | Barry Lopez | Granta Magazine
The Invitation
Barry Lopez
‘The effort to know a place deeply is, ultimately, an expression of the human desire to belong, to fit somewhere.’
