Biology of Language: The Epistemology of Reality – Maturana (1978)

TLDR

This book is about language and the author shall use language, notwithstanding that this use of language to speak about language is within the core of the problem I wish to consider.

Abstract
2. What processes take place in a linguistic interaction that permit an organism (us) to describe and to predict events that it may experience? This is my way of honoring the memory of Eric H. Lenneberg, if one honors the memory of another scientist by speaking about one’s own work Whatever the case, I wish to honor his memory not only because of his great accomplishments, but also because he was capable of inspiring his students, as the symposium on which this book is based revealed. The only way I can do this is to accept the honor of presenting my views about biology, language, and reality. I shall, accordingly, speak about language as a biologist. In doing so, I shall use language, notwithstanding that this use of language to speak about language is within the core of the problem I wish to consider.

[PDF] Biology of Language: The Epistemology of Reality | Semantic Scholar

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Biology-of-Language%3A-The-Epistemology-of-Reality-Maturana/94097d89173928e11fc20f851cf05c9138cbfbb3

John Evans on LinkedIn – ‘I think I may have found the origin of the widely quoted ‘mental models don’t exist’ trope’

[A very interesting contribution from John – which leads (to my mind) further to the need for untangling of the ‘mental models’ conversations. See comments on this blog for cross-links]

John Evans – Liberating & Democratizing Systems Thinking from the clutches of the Standardizers, Specializers Professionalizers. Very Critical of Systems Heuristics (what an anti-systemic concept). 40yrs Systems Analysis & DesignLiberating & Democratizing Systems Thinking from the clutches of the Standardizers, Specializers Professionalizers. Very Critical of Systems Heuristics (what an anti-systemic concept). 40yrs Systems Analysis & Design

“I think I may have found the origin of the widely quoted ‘mental models don’t exist’ trope.”

Post | Feed | LinkedIn
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7331018451945218050/?commentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Acomment%3A%28activity%3A7331018451945218050%2C7332912071530938368%29&dashCommentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Afsd%5Fcomment%3A%287332912071530938368%2Curn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7331018451945218050%29

This week in Systemic Design newsletter signup and ARC25: Inquiry into case reporting in systems and systemic design

[The excellent ‘this wek in Systemic Design newsletter’ regularly draws items from The Systems Community of Inquiry (here), so there’s a bit of (cybernetic) circulatiry in citing all their newsletters – however they always have interesting and relevant stuff, many items of which I don’t catch here – and some with a stronger design bent than I would feature. Case in point, interesting item below on ‘case reporting in systems and systemic design’. Anyway, I recommend you subscribe]


ARC25: Inquiry into case reporting in systems and systemic design
BY RYAN MURPHY | MAY 2025 | RSD14, RSD14 PROGRAMME, SDA BLOG

In the lead-up to RSD14, there was a collective sense that now is time to formally recognise and track—where “track” means both “follow and capture” and “include” as in creating a discourse—case reports. Do you agree? RSD14–RSDX is planning an exploratory inquiry into case reporting, held online on October 21. Join the ARC25 conversations.

The case for cases
https://rsdsymposium.org/arc25-case-reporting/

Harish’s Notebook – The Form of Decency – Jose (2025)

Marvin Minsky in 2011 on Warren McCulloch: For whom the world was a stage (100/151 of ‘life stories of remarkable people’ on YouYube)

[Leads on to quite a few other interesting life stories – h/t the Brain Inspired Complexity Group – https://stream.syscoi.com/2025/05/25/want-to-join-the-complexity-group-email-list-from-the-brain-inspired-podcast-by-paul-middlebrooks-reading-through-the-essays-in-david-krakauers-collection-of-classic-complexity-papers/]

Web of Stories – Life Stories of Remarkable People

31 Oct 2016

To hear more of Marvin Minsky’s stories, go to the playlist:    • Marvin Minsky – The amazing videophon…   The scientist, Marvin Minsky (1927-2016) was one of the pioneers of the field of Artificial Intelligence, having founded the MIT AI Lab in 1970. Since the 1950s, his work involved trying to uncover human thinking processes and replicate them in machines. [Listener: Christopher Sykes; date recorded: 2011] TRANSCRIPT: That strange period around the beginning of the artificial intelligence laboratory when I spent a lot of time… sometimes I went on trips with this wonderful man and Warren McCulloch had – at that time – he was already… he was one of the great pioneers of cybernetics. So, in fact before Norbert Wiener did… wrote his famous book called Cybernetics, which I think came out in 1949, McCulloch had been working on neural networks – maybe the first – and he had a little group of… he had a 14 year old prodigy named Walter Pitts in Chicago and they worked out this paper that was published in 1943, so, that’s many years before Norbert Wiener came on the scene. And he had been a psychiatrist, a physician… neurologist really, and started the neuroscience laboratory at MIT and was a very dramatic world class actor figure. And I went on trips with him and… and it gave me a new view of the world because… when McCulloch… I remember one day he said: ‘I’m going to explain something to the psychologists.’ And he had a sort of grand view of… of this… the importance of cybernetics, which was correct. Otherwise, you would have said he was delusional. And so, I went with him and it was a little meeting with about six or seven people. But he was on the stage and I realized that he was talking to the whole world. Normally, people are talking to their audience, but he would have very elaborate constructions and beautiful ways of saying things. But I had never met anyone for whom all the world was a stage; I think some… as someone put it. And from that, I got some sense that you shouldn’t waste people’s time with things that aren’t very important. Of course, nobody… nobody could live out such a commandment but, I must have spent most of a year just hanging around him and trying to understand how he could… see such importance in ordinary things. So in a way, it’s like Feynman, who would look at a little wave on the water and understand how the universe works. And McCulloch was very much like that for psychological things. He hated Freud because – in retrospect I think – because Freud was the best psychologist before him. And, you know Freud actually invented various forms of artificial intelligence and unlike the behaviorists, Freud thought of the mind as really a rather complicated thing not… not just a little feedback loop or something and… and imagined that it had many different structures which weren’t all compatible with one another and… so he… in retrospect, he had the first society of mind because it wasn’t just the conscious and unconscious, but he also had these sensors and whatever. Anyway, that was a… about a year when I got attached to this McCulloch and somewhere I wrote, maybe 100 years from now he will be seen as the greatest 20th century philosopher along with Russell and a few people like that.

Marvin Minsky – Warren McCulloch: For whom the world was a stage (100/151)

Marvin Minsky – Warren McCulloch: For whom the world was a stage (100/151) – YouTube

Want to join the complexity group email list? From the Brain Inspired podcast by Paul Middlebrooks – reading through the essays in David Krakauer’s collection of classic complexity papers

The complexity group meets periodically to discuss papers in the collection:

Foundational Papers in Complexity Science.

Meetings are open to anyone. They are recorded and shared with patreon supporters.

There are over 300 participants thus far.

The group was inspired by my conversation with David Krakauer. David created the foundations collection and wrote an excellent introduction to boot:

The Complex World: An Introduction to the Fundamentals of Complexity Science

Want to join the complexity group email list?

The complexity group meets periodically to discuss papers in the collection:
 
Foundational Papers in Complexity Science.
 
Meetings are open to anyone. They are recorded and shared with patreon supporters.

Complexity Group Email List | Brain Inspired
https://braininspired.co/complexity-group-email/

Alasdair MacIntyre, 1929-2025 (a personal reflection)

‘[W]e ought to aspire to provide the best theory so far as to what type of theory the best theory so far must be: no more, but no less.’

That was the title of my extremely overwrought undergrad thesis (continued -‘Does Alasdair MacIntyre tell us how to identify a rationally acceptable system of ethics?’) in 1997 (https://www.academia.edu/10016029/1997_Benjamin_Taylor_undergraduate_thesis_does_Alasdair_MacIntyre_tell_us_how_to_identify_a_rationally_acceptable_system_of_ethics), and reflected the deep impact he had on me and my thinking, which has continued in mostly subtle ways.

I appear to have said:l (or this is an automatic AI summary – they were equally dense!):

‘The thesis examines MacIntyre’s view of modern ethics as irresolvable and interminable, highlighting the need for history to replace reification with justification. It introduces the concept of tradition, recasting irresolvability and interminability as incommensurability, and explores the possibility of communication through crisis. The work further discusses MacIntyre’s contextualist epistemology, rationality within a tradition, and the role of narrative in justifying ethical systems. It also addresses challenges such as relativism and perspectivism, and considers MacIntyre’s presentation of Thomism as a form of historicism that is neither relativist nor Hegelian. The thesis concludes by emphasizing the disquieting suggestions in MacIntyre’s work and the difficulty in establishing a tradition-based rationality with ultimately rational justification.’

He probably didn’t deserve my prognostications. But the multiple layers of his thinking – reflecting on the boundaries and origins of thinking itself, the situatedness and dependence and contingency of rationality and ethics – impressed me deeply and align with what I value most in systems |cybernetics |complexity and metarationality.

I was lucky enough to see him ‘live’ once, at a lecture in London that I think was organised by Anthony Grayling, and his mien and delivery spoke – as on the live and YouTube lectures I have seen since – of someone whose way of life was completely and deeply aligned with his thinking. This was reflected in the big shifts of belief and alignment he made during his life. His intellectual journey – from Marxism to Thomism – demonstrates a commitment to rigorous inquiry and openness to transformation.

So his death marks the passing of a philosopher whose work has profoundly influenced my own thinking and practice, and more importantly has been an important voice in the world In After Virtue, MacIntyre diagnosed the fragmentation of moral language in modernity and proposed a return to virtue ethics grounded in historical traditions and communal practices.

His critique of modern moral discourse and revival of Aristotelian virtue ethics have been central to my understanding of ethics within organisations and society. This perspective and his concept of “practices” have l informed my approach to organisational development, emphasising the cultivation of internal goods and the importance of narrative in shaping ethical practices.

His later work highlighted the role of vulnerability and dependence in human life, challenging the notion of the autonomous individual. MacIntyre’s emphasis on the historical and cultural embeddedness of moral reasoning, recognising that moral concepts evolve within traditions has also been of great value.

Alasdair MacIntyre’s legacy is one of profound philosophical insight coupled with a deep concern for the moral fabric of society. His work continues to challenge and inspire those of us committed to ethical practice in complex organisational and societal contexts.

RIP

Posts referencing MacIntyre featured here

Classic paper Epistemological crises, dramatic narrative and the philosophy of science / Alasdair MacIntyre. – The Monist, 1977 https://stream.syscoi.com/2018/09/23/epistemological-crises-dramatic-narrative-and-the-philosophy-of-science-alasdair-mcintyre-the-monist-1977/

Ben Sweeting (a fellow MacIntyre fan) https://stream.syscoi.com/2018/09/22/cybernetics-virtue-ethics-and-design-ben-sweeting-rsd16/

The meaning of the public good – https://stream.syscoi.com/2018/06/03/the-meaning-of-the-public-good-inquirer-opinion/

Psyberton – https://stream.syscoi.com/2023/02/13/whatever-next-psybertron-asks/

His classic lecture ‘the sources of unpredictability in human affairs’ – https://stream.syscoi.com/2021/05/26/alasdair-macintyre-the-sources-of-unpredictability-in-human-affairs-1972-youtube/

RIP Timothy FH Allen, president of the ISSS 2008-2009

As per David Ing’s post on LinkedIn:

Timothy F.H. Allen, president of International Society for the Systems Sciences 2008-2009, passed away peacefully in his home, surrounded by his family, on May 1, 2025.

With his work on ecosystem ecology, I learned more about living systems than anyone else in the systems community. After his retirement, he was proud of putting together a reader, so that other could continue to learn.

Curtin, Charles G., and Timothy F. H. Allen, eds. 2018. Complex Ecology: Foundational Perspectives on Dynamic Approaches to Ecology and Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://lnkd.in/gxj8NKDt .

More details on news forwarded by Tom Brandner is reposted at https://lnkd.in/gN7Csbv2

(1) Post | LinkedIn

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/daviding_timothy-fh-allen-president-of-international-activity-7325206437045895168-NeCe/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAACuq-oBecVFDW6PCf3lkoG-peMeuLBeoho

Interesting LinkedIn post from Stefan Knabe – systems thinking in English and German, algorithms and social patterns

Click the link to see Stefan’s pdf in the post

For over 20 years, I’ve been trying to make systems thinking more visible and impactful in German-speaking countries — in organizations, education, and leadership. Honestly, it’s not a job marked by quick wins. It often feels like gardening in a climate not yet suited for this particular plant. The fruit ripens slowly — if at all. But I keep going, because I deeply believe: without systems thinking, any transformation remains superficial.

Two years ago, I started a personal experiment: two smartphones, two numbers, one person. One phone engages only with German-language content, the other with English-language content. (Interestingly, both algorithms now merge into one feed on my desktop — like a digital biotope.) The contrast is striking: there are significant differences in tone, topics, ethical framing, solution-orientation, and how theory translates into practice. And spoiler alert: systems thinking is practically invisible in German discourse. That’s why I’ve collected and condensed a few reflections — short, pointed, and ready for discussion.

💬 What do you think? What does it take for you to think, lead, and act systemically?
I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments.

Stefan Knabe https://www.linkedin.com/in/stefan-knabe-79a8361a6/

Post: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/stefan-knabe-79a8361a6_thinking-about-stefan-knabe-ugcPost-7330972125631000577-jooE/?rcm=ACoAAACuq-oBecVFDW6PCf3lkoG-peMeuLBeoho

SCiO Open May 2025 – Steve Hales Operational Loops and Viable Service Management (YouTube)

SCiO systems and complexity in organisation

20 May 2025

Viable Service Management – Operational Loops

#Steve looks into the operations space of service management systems where the user interfaces with the organisation. The focus is on three particular ‘services’: IT services, car repairs, and healthcare; and shows the similarities and differences in how they manage the different types of ‘repair’ (cybernetic) loops. Of particular interest is how the user is drawn into the organisation for these processes.

Systems Research and Behavioral Science is inviting applications for the role of Editor-in-Chief – deadline 13 June 2025

Systems Research and Behavioral Science is inviting applications for the role of Editor-in-Chief

Systems Research and Behavioral Science: Editor-in-Chief Recruitment

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/10991743a/homepage/call-for-applications/eic

Pando Funding: Financing System Change Networks – Ricigliano and Muoio (2025)

Medium/Kumu blog

Pando Funding: Financing System Change Networks

By Robert Ricigliano and Anna Muoio

https://blog.kumu.io/pando-funding-financing-system-change-networks-58050718f093


Pando Funding: Financing System Change Networks

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/amuoio_what-if-the-way-we-fund-change-is-actually-activity-7330280480136642560-mcMM/?rcm=ACoAAACuq-oBecVFDW6PCf3lkoG-peMeuLBeoho

European Union for Systemics (EUS) – 12th EUS International Congress, 15-17/10/2025, Brussels, Belgium, Online Conference

12th EUS International Congress

15 > 17/10/2025, Brussels, Belgium, Online Conference

https://www.ues-eus.org/2025/introduction.html

ANTICIPATING SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS

OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Call for Abstracts

Dear Madam, Sir,

For the 12th International Congress of the European Union for Systemics (UES2025), the submission deadline for abstracts is extended to May 31, 2025!

> To find more information about the conference, visit the website : www.ues-eus.org/2025

> To submit your abstract, log in the UES 2025 conference submission portal provided by Microsoft : Submission Portal.

Register on CMT and check “UES2025” in the Conference List.

We look forward to receiving your contribution and welcoming you to the UES2025 Congress!

Should you have any questions, feel free to contact us at congress-ues2025@uclouvain.be.

Best regards,

Nikitas A. Assimakopoulos, President, Conference Chair

Damien Claeys, General Secretary, Conference Co-chair

Alejandra Acevedo De Los Ríos, Conference Co-chair

What Lies Beneath – Oshry (2025)

Barry Oshry writes:

P and S Logo
What Lies Beneath – Barry Oshry

Attached is a comprehensive, refinement of my 5 + decades of research and insights about organic systems. I wrote it during COVID because I thought it was an opportunity to bring my thinking up to date and reach out to audiences we hadn’t been reaching. I think the paper is the best, most up-to-date version of the framework. As its creator, my vision continues to be to put this information into the hands of as many potential users as possible – trainers, program participants, clients, and curious learners. Use it well.
Barry Oshry

Click here to download “What Lies Beneath”

SysPrac25 Is Now Open for Booking! Early bird discounts available until the end of June 2025 – The Systems Thinking Practitioners Conference, 3-4 September 2025, Milton Keynes UK

Book now for SysPrac25 

Early bird discounts available through June 2025

Join us at SysPrac25. This year’s conference promises a vibrant mix of inspiring talksinteractive jam sessionsinsightful keynote addresses, and fireside chats with leading voices in the field.

You’ll experience:

  • Story moments that bring systems thinking to life through real-world case studies
  • Hands-on workshops exploring the topics that matter most to practitioners
  • Engaging sessions selected by the community—including students and early-career professionals

SysPrac25 will include an embedded Summer School and Continuing Professional Development (CPD) track – designed to build real-world competence and deepen your practical application of systems thinking.

Participants can build their own conference experience, selecting sessions à la carte based on interest and need.

Special Discounts Available

We’re pleased to offer a range of discount codes for different participant types and booking options. Enter the code when booking to receive your discount, and use the Early Bird rate up and until the end of June 2025.

For Non-Members
  • Day One or Day Two (Early Bird): Use code EARLY20 to get £20 off, reducing the price to £130
  • Full Conference (Early Bird): Use code EARLY40FULL to get £40 off, bringing the total to £210
For SCiO Members
  • Day One or Day Two (Standard): Use code SCIO20 for £20 off, making the price £130
  • Full Conference (Standard): Use code SCIO40FULL to receive £40 off, reducing the price to £210
  • Day One or Day Two (Early Bird): Use code SCIO30 for an enhanced £30 off, lowering the price to £120
  • Full Conference (Early Bird): Use code SCIO50FULL to save £50, with a final price of £200
For Students
  • Day One or Day Two: Enter code APP75 for an incredible £75 discount, bringing the price down to £75
  • Full Conference: Use code APPFULL100 for a £100 discount, paying just £150

Be sure to use the correct code based on your participant type and booking option to secure the best rate.

We can’t wait to welcome you to SysPrac25 – where systems thinking meets real-world impact!

SysPrac25 Is Now Open for Booking! | SCiO – Systems and Complexity in Organisation
https://www.systemspractice.org/node/1445