Cento Edgar Morin – Un omaggio all’umanista planetario – Complexity Institute, Italy – 5 luglio 2021 21.00-22.30, Italian time

source:

Cento Edgar Morin – Un omaggio all’umanista planetario – Complexity Institute

Cento Edgar Morin – Un omaggio all’umanista planetario

Cento Edgar Morin 

Un omaggio all’umanista planetario

 

Dialogo a più voci con alcuni autori del volume 

Cento Edgar Morin

100 firme italiane per i 100 anni dell’umanista planetario

a cura di Mauro Ceruti

Cento e più ragioni per onorare lo studioso, il maestro e l’amico, che oggi, nel pieno di questa gravissima crisi mondiale, indica l’orizzonte di un nuovo umanesimo planetario e continua a motivare alla resistenza contro ogni forma di barbarie, per costruire insieme reti e oasi di solidarietà, di fraternità, di pensiero creativo. Per uscire, insieme, da questa “Età del ferro dell’Era planetaria”.

Quando:

5 luglio 2021 21.00-22.30

Web Meeting

continues in source:

Cento Edgar Morin – Un omaggio all’umanista planetario – Complexity Institute

Linguistic Clues for Spotting Feedback Loops in the Wild – Kastens and Shipley

(pdf)

Click to access CC2021_LinguisticClues.pdf

System Dynamics Conference | FROM INSIGHTS TO ACTION: RESILIENCE TO GLOBAL PROBLEMS – fully virtual conference July 25-30, 2021 System Dynamics Society

July 25 – 30, 2021 A Fully Virtual Conference

System Dynamics Conference | System Dynamics Society

The Handbook of Handbooks for Decentralised Organising – Richard D Bartlett

The Handbook of Handbooks for Decentralised Organising

The Handbook of Handbooks for Decentralised Organising – HackMD

Intransitivity – Wikipedia

Intransitivity From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigationJump to search This article is about intransitivity in mathematics. For other uses, see Intransitive (disambiguation). In mathematics, intransitivity (sometimes called nontransitivity) is a property of binary relations that are not transitive relations. This may include any relation that is not transitive, or the stronger property of antitransitivity, which describes a relation that is never transitive.

Intransitivity – Wikipedia

Counterintuitive behavior of social systems | Forrester (1971)

Counterintuitive behavior of social systems

Counterintuitive behavior of social systems | SpringerLink

Counterintuitive behavior of social systems

Theory and Decision volume 2, pages109–140 (1971)

Abstract

This paper addresses several issues of broad concern in the United States: population trends; the quality of urban life; national policy for urban growth; and the unexpected, ineffective, or detrimental results often generated by government programs in these areas.

The author does attempt to indicate how multiloop feed-back systems (to which our social systems belong) mislead us because our intuition and judgement have been formed to expect behavior different from that actually possessed by such systems. At times programs cause exactly the reverse of desired results.

It is now possible to explain how such contrary results can happen. There are fundamental reasons why people misjudge the behavior of social systems. There are orderly processes at work that frequently lead people to wrong decisions when faced with complex and highly interacting systems. Until we come to a much better understanding of social systems, we should expect that attempts to develop corrective programs will continue to disappoint us.

Stages and Dimensions of Systems Intelligence – Jones and Corner (2011)

Stages and Dimensions of Systems Intelligence

Stages and Dimensions of Systems Intelligence – Jones – 2012 – Systems Research and Behavioral Science – Wiley Online Library

Stages and Dimensions of Systems Intelligence

Rachel JonesJames Corner

First published: 03 June 2011 

https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.1090

Abstract

Following the footsteps of emotional, social, cultural and other types of intelligence, systems intelligence offers a new perspective on how individuals act with a lesser or greater degree of intelligence within physical and social systems. First appearing in the published literature in 2004, systems intelligence has resonated with the related fields of decision making, communication and leadership, among others. However, to date, a taxonomy for considering systems intelligence has yet to be described. Building off Kegan’s framework for human development and Hämäläinen and Saarinen’s recent levels, we offer a new taxonomy of systems intelligence and describe its stages and dimensions. We focus on the three stages of attentive, active and inspired systems intelligence, incorporating three, four and eight dimensions, respectively. This taxonomy serves as a useful conceptualization for the future development of measurement tools for systems intelligence and as a basis for understanding how individuals might transition between stages. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.sci-hub.se/doi/abs/10.1002/sres.1090

Second order cybernetics – Glanville (2008) in Systems science and cybernetics. Encyclopedia of life support systems

In world of infinite overlapping possibility and multiple, irreconcilable differences, what does #education mean?

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/antlerboy_benjamin-taylor-for-gilbfest-education-activity-6813728525313433600-lYt4

[June 29-30] Holistic Changemakers Needed in the age of VUCA: Taiwan National Development Council, ZA Share, and other civic partners jointly launch an international education summit to bridge social change agendas with the holistic wellness of “changemakers” in mind

June 29-30, 2021, TAIPEI — On behalf of the Taiwan National Development Council, ZA Share is hosting the 2021 Taiwan International Education Summit (TIES) completely online from June 29 to 30. The theme of TIES this year is The INNER and INTER-changes of Creative Changemakers, with the aim to move beyond the narrow focus of the technical or financial needs of changemakers seeking the common good, to bring public and key stakeholders’ attention to the holistic needs for their nourishment and growth as “whole persons.”

Curated in the spirit of human ecology, 2021 TIES will be split into four tracks to cover the Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, Social, and Ecological Dimensions of a “Changemaker’s Journey” as a whole person, to foster interdisciplinary learning and the systemic awareness of the world’s VUCA (volatile, uncertain, complex, ambiguous) nature, as amplified by the outspread of COVID-19.

In each of the four tracks, there will be an invited expert from both the Eastern and Western countries, and a selected Open Mic Representative selected from a pool of self-nominated speakers to bring an “Intercultural Mash-up” of perspectives. The line of 12 speakers range from world-renowned Sir Geoff Mulgan, systems and collective intelligence scientist, former head of policy in the UK Prime Minister’s office, and co-founder of Social Innovation Exchange (SIX), to a group of self-nominated 7th-graders from Taoyuan Chungli Junior High School who’ve dedicated themselves to addressing the challenges arose with new immigrants in their school and communities.

The format of TIES creates a fully immersive digital bilingual learning experience, which integrates active and thematic learning from the pre-event Open Mic Speaker self-nomination challenge to the highly interactive online TIES itself, to openly demonstrate the holistic spirit of Taiwan’s National 12-Year Basic Education in a bilingual, digital, and public context. The integral design of TIES also manifests the National Development Council’s determination to bridge its bilingual nation, education innovation, digital transformation, and regional revitalization agendas.

2021 TIES is completely free to attend. The TIES Opening Ceremony/Press Conference will be held online at 14:30, June 29, 2021 (Taipei Time, UTC+8).

For more information, please visit: https://forms.gle/FdkEVXtMZkzRFA4r9 (Registration Form in English)

#sustainability, #sustainableworld, #systemchange, #systems-approach, #systemsleaders, #systemsleadership, #systemsthinking

Participatory modeling – Wikipedia

Participatory modeling

Participatory modeling – Wikipedia

Participatory modeling is a purposeful learning process for action that engages the implicit and explicit knowledge of stakeholders to create formalized and shared representation(s) of reality. In this process, the participants co-formulate the problem and use modeling practices to aid in the description, solution, and decision-making actions of the group. Participatory modeling is often used in environmental and resource management contexts. It can be described as engaging non-scientists in the scientific process. The participants structure the problem, describe the system, and create a shared understanding of how the system works. This can further lead to more quantitative analyses, and may sometimes result in a computer model of the system, which is then jointly used to test policy interventions, and propose one or more solutions. Participatory modeling is often used in natural resources management,[1] such as forests[2] or water.[3][4]

There are numerous benefits from this type of modeling, including a high degree of ownership and motivation towards change for the people involved in the modeling process. It also helps to develop more acceptable solutions and often creates more consensus among the stakeholders involved.

Wikipedia isn’t great on this – the summary in this paper is better:

Participatory modelling: A review of applications in energy whole-systems
modelling to support decision making – Catherine Bal

Topaasia®: Systems Intelligence -Interview of Esa Saarinen & Raimo Hämäläinen

source:

Topaasia®: Systems Intelligence -Interview of Esa Saarinen & Raimo Hämäläinen

Topaasia: Systems Intelligence – Interview with Esa Saarinen and Raimo Hämäläinen

The Systems Intelligence is the result of the joint research work of the philosopher Esa Saarinen and professor emeritus Raimo Hämäläinen, which has been developed in Aalto University since 2001. The Systems Intelligence combines human sensitivity with the world changing engineering thinking. Topaasia – Systems Intelligence game is based on this research and made in collaboration with Esa and Raimo. We interviewed gentlemen about systems intelligence, applying it to the Topaasia format and how it can benefit organizations playing it.

Systems Intellect is a collection of human competencies

As a human being you are always part of a bigger whole or a system. The System Intelligence is the hallmark of man’s ability to strive for success in the systems, where he lives his life. It is human ability to improve life. People can easily see things in small sections and problems, instead of building a successful whole. Systems Intelligence gives you the tools to think about whether something should be done in a different way?

In the Systems intelligence, the talents already present in the human being is named so that people becomes more aware of them. The Glossary that is used aims to change and stimulate action. It is not a theory which, from the outside, depicts someone’s reality, which can be internalized and transferred to their own activities. Instead, systems intelligence is something that a person himself already does, but can do more or better. It’s a promise to be better at what you’ve been good in already and before. The aim of Systems intelligence is not only to understand the systems, but also to act in them. It aims to launch human growth process.

Areas of The System Intelligence. Source: Esa Saarinen The course Philosophy and systems thinking in Aalto University. Lecture 8 – The philosophy of the whole

Continues in source:

Topaasia®: Systems Intelligence -Interview of Esa Saarinen & Raimo Hämäläinen

Systems intelligence research group, Aalto University

http://systemsintelligence.aalto.fi/

Systems Intelligence
Research Group
at
Systems Analysis LaboratoryAalto University

Directors:
Raimo P. Hämäläinen, professor
Esa Saarinen, professor
Test your Systems IntelligenceSuomeksi

Systems Intelligence (SI) is a concept introduced in 2004 by the principal investigators. The research group develops the conceptual basis of this competence and studies its different forms and manifestations in personal and organizational contexts. We seek to distribute knowledge and stimulate interest in Systems Intelligence in different fields including management practices, learning organizations, education, human relationships, etc.

By Systems Intelligence we mean intelligent behaviour in the context of complex systems involving interaction and feedback. A subject acting with systems intelligence engages successfully and productively with the holistic feedback mechanisms of her environment. She perceives herself as part of the whole, the influence of the whole upon herself as well as her own influence upon the whole. Observing her own interdependency with the feedback-intensive environment, she is able to act intelligently.

We have also developed a test for self-evaluation. You can take the SI-test here. If you want to use the SI-test in your own projects you can find related material and instructions here.

How to help organizational SI? – Systems Intelligence serious gaming tool for organizational development

Original introduction of the concept of Systems Intelligence:

» Systems Intelligence: Connecting Engineering Thinking with Human Sensitivity, Esa Saarinen and Raimo P. Hämäläinen 2004. In Systems Intelligence – Discovering a Hidden Competence in Human Action and Organizational Life, Helsinki University of Technology, Systems Analysis Laboratory, Research Reports A88, p 9-37.

Key publications:» Systems Intelligence Inventory, J. Törmänen, R.P. Hämäläinen and E. Saarinen 2016. The Learning Organization, vol 23, issue 4, pp. 218-231. (Slides)
» Systems Intelligence – A Core Competence for Next Generation Engineers?, R.P. Hämäläinen, E. Saarinen and J. Törmänen (2018), Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE), pp. 641-644 (View at publisher) (Slides)

» Being Better Better – Living with Systems Intelligence,
Raimo P. Hämäläinen, Rachel Jones and Esa Saarinen 2014.
Aalto University Publications, CROSSOVER 4/2014.
More information about the book can be found here.

» Modeling Systems of Holding Back as Hypergames and Its Connection with Systems Intelligence, Yasuo Sasaki, Raimo P. Hämäläinen and Esa Saarinen 2015. In Systems Research and Behavioral Science Vol. 32, Issue 6, p 593-602
» Life-Philosophical Lecturing as a Systems-Intelligent Technology of the Self, Esa Saarinen 2015. In Journal of Philosophical Research
» Inducing Mindfulness Through Life-Philosophical Lecturing, Esa Saarinen and Tuuli Lehti 2014. In The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Mindfulness, p 1105-1131.
» On the importance of behavioral operations research: The case of understanding and communicating about dynamic systems, Raimo P. Hämäläinen, Jukka Luoma and Esa Saarinen 2013. In European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 228, Issue 3, p 623-634.
» Esa Saarinen and Systems Intelligence, Rachel Jones and Raimo P. Hämäläinen 2013. In Elämän filosofi, p 163-171.
» Elämän filosofi, Frank Martela, Lauri Järvilehto, Peter Kenttä & Jaakko Korhonen (eds.) 2013.
» The Systems Metaphor in Therapy Discourse: Introducing Systems Intelligence, Frank Martela and Esa Saarinen 2013. In Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 23, p 79-100.
» Acting with systems intelligence: Integrating complex responsive processes with the systems perspective, Jukka Luoma, Raimo P. Hämäläinen, and Esa Saarinen 2011. In The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62, p 3-11
» Stages and Dimensions of Systems Intelligence, Rachel Jones and Jim Corner 2012. In Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 29, p 30-45.
» The Originality of Systems Intelligence, Esa Saarinen and Raimo P. Hämäläinen 2010. In Essays on Systems Intelligence, p 9-26.
» Philosophy for Managers: Reflections of a Practitioner, Esa Saarinen 2008. In Philosophy of Management, Vol. 7, Supplement 2008 (Reprinted in Systems Intelligence – A New Lens on Human Engagement and Action, 2008)
» Systems intelligence – the way forward? A note on Ackoff’s ‘why few organizations adopt systems thinking’, Raimo P. Hämäläinen and Esa Saarinen 2008. In Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Volume 25, Issue 6, p 821-825.
» Perspectives on team dynamics: Meta learning and systems intelligence, Jukka Luoma, Raimo P. Hämäläinen and Esa Saarinen 2008. In Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Volume 25, Issue 6, p 757-767.
» Philosophy in the 21st Century: Socratic Philosophy That Matters and Engages With People, Esa Saarinen 2008. International Academy of Philosophy, News and Views, no. 20.
» Systems Intelligent Leadership, Raimo P. Hämäläinen and Esa Saarinen 2007. In Systems Intelligence in Leadership and Everyday Life, p 3-38.
» The Way Forward with Systems Intelligence, Raimo P. Hämäläinen and Esa Saarinen 2007. In Systems Intelligence in Leadership and Everyday Life, p 295-305.
» Systems Intelligence: Connecting Engineering Thinking with Human Sensitivity, Esa Saarinen and Raimo P. Hämäläinen 2004. In Systems Intelligence, p 9-37.

Gosh, there are a lot of TED(x) talks introducing complex systems…

https://www.google.com/search?q=site:www.ted.com+%22complex+systems%22+OR+%22complex+adaptive+systems%22+OR+%22systems+thinking%22+OR+%22complex+system%22&rlz=1C1DIMC_enGB905GB905&sxsrf=ALeKk03xoboV1ZkAH5uAlWxuaItvDQQItQ:1624449422799&source=lnms&tbm=vid&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjGlLTW2a3xAhV17eAKHTxHB4sQ_AUoA3oECAEQBQ&biw=1735&bih=920

The magic of three | van der Merwe (2007)

The magic of three Johann van der Merwe Kybernetes ISSN: 0368-492X Article publication date: 23 October 2007

The magic of three | Emerald Insight

https://www.emerald.com.sci-hub.se/insight/content/doi/10.1108/03684920710827409/full/html?skipTracking=true