Source

System Diagrams: A Practical Guide

System Diagrams: A Practical Guide

Bob Williams

pdf is ‘contributionware’

Systems Diagrams: A Practical Guide. 

The past few years have seen increased use of system diagrams. System diagrams provide an excellent way of clarifying complex situations and help to address identified problems. Potential users are spoilt for choice – there are literally dozens of different diagram based approaches.

However, there are not many easily accessible publications that describe how to match and use appropriate diagrams to particular tasks. Which is why System Diagrams; A Practical Guide came to be written.

The discussion of each approach is accompanied by a worked example and a set of questions that that the diagram addresses. There are also chapters on the role of diagrams in general; what constitutes a systemic inquiry and the overall nature of system diagrams.

System Diagrams; A Practical Guide covers six diagram approaches that between them cover a wide range of uses;

Rich Picturing. Useful when trying to get to grips with the complexity of a situation and work out which aspects you should be focusing on.

Influence Diagrams. Useful when you want to have a snapshot of what is influencing a particular issue or topic at a particular moment in time.

Causal Diagrams. Useful when you want to explore the possible consequences of specific causal relationships within a particular issue or topic over a period of time.

Cynefin. A diagram that helps you to think about and respond to a particular situation, or intervention, through five different framings; simple, complicated, complex, chaotic and confused.

Viable System Model (VSM). A diagram that helps to assess and ensure the viability of a purposeful activity, given the range of competing demands from different components of that endeavour.

Cultural Historical Activity System Model (CHAT). A diagram that guides a series of questions about how to people with different motivations can work together creatively and effectively, especially when responding to changing and challenging events.

Source: System Diagrams: A Practical Guide

Bob Williams

System Diagrams: A Practical Guide

Invitation to the First Oceania People Need People Session and the Screening of the Bateson Approach to LearningDear Benjamin Taylor, We have two exciting events coming up soon, for you to enjoy.Firstly a People Need People session for all the Bateson Anniversary event attendees in the Oceania timezone and the screening of the most recent live Anniversary event – the Bateson Approach to Learning.Read on for registration links and share with your community! With endless warmth, Fiona, Lesley, April & Nora  

Upcoming People Need People session & Screening of the Bateson Approach to Learning

RSD11 CALL FOR CONTRIBUTIONS

RSD11 Call for Contributions

There’s still time to submit papers and presentations for RSD11. This year the programme explores transdisciplinary connections and perspectives that augment systemic approaches. We plan to hold sessions online and in-person at the University of Brighton from October 13 to 16.

Here’s the brief – please share with your colleagues

RSD11: Possibilities and Practices of Systemic Design

As designers look to address systemic challenges, they must wrestle with tensions and conflicting requirements within their practices and the situations they seek to change. Systemic questions cannot be approached one at a time in isolation. Yet, it is inevitable that design is partial in its engagements – to address everything is implausible or uncritical to implicit boundary judgements and the privileges of dominant perspectives. Unpredictable interdependencies require a cautious approach, yet incremental strategies risk entrenching underlying errors and injustices by making the status quo more palatable. Profound, long-term changes are needed, but the urgency of the present also demands immediately achievable actions. 

At RSD11, we look to expand further systemic design’s modes of working:

Systemic design has thus far drawn primarily on methodological and organisational aspects of systems thinking as a way of handling complexity. In what ways might other perspectives augment systemic approaches?

The systems field is open to the creative arts, countercultural movements, enactive cognitive science, family therapy, posthumanism, and others. How might these transdisciplinary connections further enrich and critique systemic design research and practice?

Systemic Design Association | RSDsymposium.org

Perspectives on complexity | Research Festival 2022

Rethink how you approach complex research challenges

Part of the Research Festival 2022

Event co-hosted with Schumacher College

29Jun 2022

14:00-18:00

Rolle Marquee, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus PL4 8AA and online via Zoom

Perspectives on complexity | Research Festival 2022 – University of Plymouth

Seymour Papert

Seymour Papert – Wikipedia

One of those interesting people – thanks to one of the cybernetics discussion list, I just heard about – indeed, saw – a short exchange of letters between McCulloch and Piaget expressing a desire to discuss their mutual interest in genetic epistemology, facilitated by Papert..

Obituary: https://news.mit.edu/2016/seymour-papert-pioneer-of-constructionist-learning-dies-0801

Also from wikipiedia (stub article)

In child psychology, Papert’s principle is often used to explain the results of Jean Piaget‘s experiments. It is named for Seymour Papert and states that:

Some of the most crucial steps in mental growth are based not simply on acquiring new skills, but on acquiring new administrative ways to use what one already knows.

— Marvin Minsky

Archive of his papers etc: http://dailypapert.com/

Moses and Systems Thinking in Abuja NigeriaThis blog entry includes a request for funding for the initiative discussed, systems thinking in Abuja, Nigeria. I review how I came to know Moses Agbara as his mentor. As the founder of Systems Thinking Marin, I have found only one other effort to promote systems thinking at a local level, a small group in Ontario, Canada. I am therefore very happy to support Moses and his work to bring systems thinking to his home city.

Moses and Systems Thinking in Abuja Nigeria – Systems Thinking Marin

Link may not resolve in wordpress so I am repeating it here: https://www.systemsthinkingmarin.org/resources/system-of-systems-thinkers/

CECAN Associate, Dr Stuart Astill (strategyandevidence.com), has just released two series of dates for his very popular training programme exploring Value for Money (VfM) – with special half-day modules looking at VfM under complexity and VfM in evaluation as well as a one-day module on cost-benefit analysis. The next runs of this training series are taking place in September/October and November/ December – it is advisable to book early if you wish to guarantee a place.Value for Money (VfM) ‘core course’and modules on ‘evaluation’, ‘complexity’ and ‘cost-benefit analysis’

Value for Money (VfM) Core Course and Modules on Evaluation, Complexity and Cost-Benefit Analysis

Article: Coaching for Awareness-Based Systems Change

Article: Coaching for Awareness-Based Systems Change — Illuminate Systems

DOI:10.1086/286788Corpus ID: 16179485Behavior, Purpose and TeleologyA. Rosenblueth, N. Wiener, Julian BigelowPublished 1 January 1943PsychologyPhilosophy of Science

[PDF] Behavior, Purpose and Teleology | Semantic Scholar

pdf

Cybernetic governance of the Peruvian State: a proposalRicardo Rodriguez-Ulloa AI & SOCIETY (2022)Cite this article2053 Accesses2 AltmetricMetricsdetailsAbstractThis paper aims to make a proposal to govern the Peruvian State under the umbrella of management cybernetics, following the paths of the viable system model (VSM), proposed by Prof. Stafford Beer, enriched with other soft and hard systemic methodologies and technologies, to cover the soft and hard issues that are part of the complex Peruvian reality at different levels of recursion. For doing this, four defined perspectives were adopted to understand the complexity of Peru: the sectoral view, the regions view, the river basins view and the macroregions view. Peru is seen as a system in focus, defining, for each of these four perspectives, the five systems that VSM has. The application of the VSM in each perspective serves to apply it in two modes: diagnosis and design, according to the respective perspective. Then an integrative analysis and reflection is done considering the four perspectives, to analyze the viability of the VSM approach in the governance of the Peruvian State to establish some conclusions and recommendations in relation to the proposal, appearing at the end of the paper.

Cybernetic governance of the Peruvian State: a proposal | SpringerLink

source:

Decentralising leadership: from monolithic to modular and polyce… — Danielo

Decentralising leadership: from monolithic to modular and polycentric

0x8B58

May 14th, 2022

Why talk about leadership?

Let’s bring it back to the people. If you’ve ever been in an executive position, been an influential DAO member, or founded a new organisation, you’ll likely viscerally know the weight of responsibility. There can be so much work, so much uncertainty and yet such a pressing need to make big, complex decisions, often with long-lasting consequences. It’s exhilarating, but it’s also exhausting if not downright nerve-wracking. Conversely, being in a disempowered position can quickly become frustrating, if not depressing. And the difference is often touted to be: leadership.

We’re told that there’s a mindset and a set of skills that leaders have, that if we master those, we can make things right. Countless researchers have followed this path, compiling theories and models. Meanwhile, the pressure on ‘leaders’ has continued to grow to master and exhibit these traits – leaders are meant to be visionaries, strategists, motivators, servants, coaches… the list goes on.

With all the work happening on leadership, and all these expectations, why should we here, talk about leadership?

First, with Web3 we can rethink this topic and many others from the ground up, learning from the past but primarily building on first principles rather than stale thinking. And second, because I fear we’re missing a trick here, and continuing down this path is harmful and unsustainable.

What follows is an attempt to bring a new perspective on an old debate, a critique inspired by the excellent work many have done and continue to do in this field.

Continues in source: Decentralising leadership: from monolithic to modular and polycentric

Decentralising leadership: from monolithic to modular and polyce… — Danielo

From Daniela Ospina, who says:

By @_Daniel_Ospina

More of this thinking happening in RnDAO

Source:

What would it take to reimagine the future of collaborative governance? – Arantzazulab

What would it take to reimagine the future of collaborative governance?

Part 2 of a 4-part series- What we learnt about systems convenors and why they can help us to reimagine future-fit organisations and governance.

At the beginning of this year, I started a research fellowship with Arantzazulab. Our idea was simple – find examples of where transformation has happened, on the ground, where said transformation was led by communities or used some form of collaborative governance. We wanted to use and share the findings, hoping to work with others interested in creating systems change by working with and through ecosystems.

There is a lot of interesting insight in Part 1 of this series, and we strongly hope that you read that one first. In case you don’t have time, the summary is –

We hypothesise that for transformation to occur, at the scale needed to address the massive challenges associated with climate change, decreasing trust in governments and democracy, deep structural economic disparities, and human inequalities, we need the following –

1. New future-fit institutional and governance structures. These will need to maximise local cultures and connect through to planetary level ecosystems.
2. New funding mechanisms that move beyond project-based, consultancy-based or membership-based mindsets.
3. To learn from systems convenors who are already acting in their local ecosystems to catalyse and amplify knowledge and capabilities, to inform the future-fit design.
4. To identify any new roles that we may need to create in the future-fit design.

This future needs to operate at planetary level with deep accountabilities and responsibilities across borders as if we were one world.

This blog post is a deep dive into point number 3.

Continues in source: What would it take to reimagine the future of collaborative governance?

What would it take to reimagine the future of collaborative governance? – Arantzazulab