Nick Ananin’s systems thinking events google map – always updated (and if I have this right, now embedded below)

Values and systems again – GentlySerious – Medium

via Values and systems again – GentlySerious – Medium

Why (Intervene in) Systems Changes? – Coevolving Innovations – David Ing

A series of pieces on coevolving.com from January-March of this year, which I’ll be linking out one per week (but all are on David Ing’s blog already). Here is 3/5

via Why (Intervene in) Systems Changes? – Coevolving Innovations

Why (Intervene in) Systems Changes?

With a focus on “ecological systems”, the second of four lectures planned for the Systemic Design course in the Master’s program in Strategic Foresight and Innovation at OCAD University proceeded as a timeboxed presentation:  targeting 40 minutes of content (skipping slides to stay within time constraints), followed by 10 minutes of discussion.  Since the slides are rich with content and links to sources, students were directed to pay attention to what I was saying, over trying to read the slides projected behind me.

The agenda was in four sections:

  • [preamble] Errors, Attention and Traps (Ecological Understanding)
    • Systems Changes Learning Circle (Bateson, Gibson, Ingold)
    • (Resistances to) Changing as primary system of interest
  • A. Socio-Ecological Systems Perspective
    • Tavistock Institute (Emery, Trist)
    • Organization as primary system of interest
  • B. (Social-) Ecological Systems  + Panarchy
    • Stockholm Resilience Centre (Holling, Walker, Peterson)
    • Ecology as primary system of interest
  • C. The Ecosystem Approach
    • Resilience Alliance (Waltner-Toews, Kay)
    • Sustainable development project as primary system of interest

Online, the video is available on Youtube for streaming.

Viewers who prefer to watch video on a disconnected device can download a video file.

Video H.264 MP4 WebM
January 31
(1h18m)
[20200129_OCADU_Ing HD m4v]
(HD 2666kbps 1.2GB)
[20200129_OCADU_Ing nHD m4v]
(nHD 1352kps 637MB)
[20200129_OCADU_Ing HD webm]
(HD VP8 425kbps 292MB)
[20200129_OCADU_Ing nHD webm]
(nHD VP8 224kbps 156MB)

Readers who want to follow through on web link references may want to review the slides directly.

The lecture was given twice.  The Wednesday full-time section classroom was disrupted by a water supply issue in the graduate school building, so we all decamped to a lecture theatre in the main building.  The Friday part-time section proceeded as scheduled, making that audio recording the practical foundation with presentation slides for the web video.

The acoustics in the January 31 session (part-time cohort) was better for the web video.  The digital audio for the talk on January 29 (full-time cohort) was in an auditorium with stadium seating, and a microphone. Versions boosted by 3db make quieter sections more audible.

Audio
January 29
(54m58s)
[20200129_OCADU_Ing ErrorsAttentionTraps.mp3]
(51MB)
[20200129_OCADU_Ing ErrorsAttentionTraps plus3db.mp3]
(51MB)
January 31
(59m37s)
[2020031_OCADU_Ing ErrorsAttentionTraps.mp3]
(55MB)
[20200115_OCADU_Ing ErrorsAttentionTraps plus3db.mp3]
(55MB)

Before diving into the multiple views on ecological systems, questions as to whether to intervene (as willful action following wei) or to let nature takes its course (as non-intrusive action following wuwei).  Moving away from an anthropocentric perspective, illustrating action as part or not part of nature may be clearer in observing the Canadian beaver.

 

The Systems School Newsletter – and (paid, online) systems change course

“all the learnings to support you through this transition”

goodies in this newsletter

  • learning: methods for the systems change framework
  • learning: power in the system
  • external learning: grounded hosting and engagement online w/ beehive production

+ starts easter monday – act fast!

  • let’s experiment!
  • facilitation and hosting guides for online events

dear systems community,

i’ve been grateful that in the last few days, my state of being is slowly shifting, from one of despair and overwhelm to inspiration and expansion.  this is coming from unexpected conversation, connections and dreaming up the future with others and i’m so grateful for it.  in this shift, i’m reminded of this quote from picasso…

inspiration exists, but it must find you working

so we’re transforming here at the systems school. i’m thinking of this less as ‘pivot’ or even adaptation, and more that we’re finding a state of flow within the complexity, bearing witness to the transformation and seeking out the energy and momentum that will carry us forward. it’s presenting us with some pretty incredible opportunities, and we hope you’ll come join us.

yours in learning.

seanna
director, the systems school
upcoming online learning events

systems methods for the systems change framework
an exciting collaboration, with all-star systems thinker dr.fiona mckenzie, director of orange compass https://www.orangecompass.com.au.  in this series we’re getting right down to practice.  each week, we will teach how to apply a systems method for one aspect of the systems change framework http://bit.ly/systemschangeframework.  you will receive facilitation guides to apply the methods, and additional resources to support your learning.

dates: wednesdays 11:00-12:30pm (melbourne time), starting may 6th for 9 weeks
zoom platform, recordings available
sliding scale fees, starting at $350+

  • week 1 – introduction to the systems change framework and systemic change
  • week 2 – systems practices
  • week 3 – purposeful engagement
  • week 4 – reflect, learn, adapt
  • week 5 – define situation
  • week 6 – gain clarity
  • week 7 – find leverage
  • week 8 – act strategically
  • week 9 – ‘ask me anything’ session

register (https://www.eventbrite.com.au/e/systems-methods-for-the-systems-change-framework-tickets-102232185218)

power in the system
we’re working with superstar facilitator lina patel (https://au.linkedin.com/in/linaxpatel) to bring you this very special offering.  originally planning for an in-person learning event we’re pivoting online to bring this content to you now as we all wrestle with how to engage in these new ways of working.

in this weekly virtual learning series, we will explore and unpack issues of power within the practice of systems thinking each thursday from 11:00am – 12:30pm melbourne time beginning may 28th

  • week 1 – how and why is power so critically important to our work in systems?
  • week 2 –  how can we examine power in systems thinking?
  • week 3 – how is power showing up in OUR system? How can we adapt and become more power literate?

register (https://www.eventbrite.com.au/e/power-in-the-system-tickets-100456594378)

grounded online hosting and engagement – by beehive productions (https://beehive-productions.net/)

**starts easter monday**
discount available – email seanna(mailto:seanna@thesystemsschool.org?subject=i%20want%20to%20register%20for%20the%20beehive%20course) – we have a group of 3 already registering for a 30% discount

our friends at beehive productions are putting on a great learning series on grounded online hosting and engagement:

“As we find ourselves adapting to a new reality, finding alternative ways to socialize, do our work, and stay in contact with loved ones near and far, many of us are going beyond the initial panic and starting to realize the incredible potential of working online.

How we meet and host each other online is more important now than ever, whether the groups we are hosting are large or small. It can be a deeply meaningful experience or it can be very frustrating. This intensive is designed to minimize the frustration and maximize the value of our online engagements.”

see more details here (https://beehive-productions.mykajabi.com/GroundedResponse)

folks here’s what we know:

  • the way we are connecting and working together is rapidly changing and we need to develop skills to do this well
  • our meta systems are transforming and breaking open to new possibilities but we need to be active participants in rebuilding these
  • we have so much to learn from traditional ways of knowing, now is the time to honour, respect and engage with these practices
  • our future possibilities are ALL of ours, to dream into being

incredibly talented folks are coming into conversation to create an experiment and we’d like to invite you to participate.  we’re creating a space to engage with everything i’ve noted above, all while recognizing this as an experiment.

we are in it for the learning, not the precision
we are in it for the connection, not the perfected outcomes
we are in it for the momentum building, not the answer
sign me up for the experiment (mailto:seanna@thesystemsschool.org?subject=sign%20me%20up%20for%20the%20experiment)
good practices for hosting online

i recently held a session and share some insight on hosting online, and in preparing for that came across a number of excellent resources others had already put together.  check them out:

here (https://drive.google.com/file/d/16KIKMiLftq54sRGG75BJ1ISFRAJcjMoo/view) are the slides i shared in the session.

please join and contribute – COVID-19 Resources (Systems Community) | Facebook Group

Set up by Rob Young – useful links and a place for systems community conversations

via COVID-19 Resources (Systems Community) | Groups | Facebook

Centre for Systems Philosophy

via Centre for Systems Philosophy

What is Systems Philosophy?

Systems Philosophy is the philosophical component of Systemology, the transdisciplinary field concerned with the scientific study of all kinds of systems. In general terms Systems Philosophy arose out of the need to develop a scientific worldview that reflected the realization that everything in the concrete world is a system or part of one, with “system” being understood as “a whole that functions as a whole in virtue of the relationship between its parts”. The implication of this insight is that to properly understand something we have to understand not only its composition (as in the classical reductionistic approach), but also the relationships between its parts, between the parts and the whole, and between the whole and its environment. This calls for a change in perspective in how we conceptualise, study and engage with the concrete world. The central aim of Systems Philosophy is to articulate the systems worldview and find ways to use it to help solve important problems in science, philosophy and society.

Systems Philosophy arose specifically in the context of a search for a worldview that would appropriately reflect not only the physical complexity of the world but also the meaning, value and dignity of life and culture. The central ambition of systems philosophers from the outset has been to contribute in practical ways to scientific and humanistic efforts to build societies grounded in the values of justice, freedom, social welfare and environmental stewardship.

Key publications – http://www.systemsphilosophy.org/recommended-reading.html

History and development – http://www.systemsphilosophy.org/history-and-development-of-systems-philosophy.html

Scope – http://www.systemsphilosophy.org/scope-of-systems-philosophy.html

ME_WE game | Inspire people to adhere to the new existential concept of the Me-We-World through gamification.

via ME_WE game | Inspire people to adhere to the new existential concept of the Me-We-World through gamification.

G-Complexity, Quantum Computation and Anticipatory Processes, Nadin (2014) – and the concept of G-Complexity

Dialogue is sought by M. Nadin – https://www.nadin.ws/

 

Machine Intelligence – A Chimera. AI & Society. London: Springer Verlag (Springer Nature) 2018, pp. 1-28

Rethinking the experiment: a necessary (R)evolution, AI & Society 33:4, pp 467–485. New York/London: Springer. 2018

Rethinking the Experiment. https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.02491

Machine Intelligence – A Chimera. AI & Society. Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-018-0842-8

http://www.nadin.ws/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Machine_Intelligence_Chimera_AI-society.pdf

Medicine: The Decisive Test of Anticipation, Anticipation and Medicine. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishers, 2016, pp. 1-27 (978-1482208191)

https://www.nadin.ws/archives/2926

G-Complexity, Quantum Computation and Anticipatory Processes, Computer Communication & Collaboration, 2:1, 2014, 16-34. (DOIC: 2292-1036-2014-01-003-18).

https://www.nadin.ws/archives/2220

The Intractable and the Undecidable – Computation and Anticipatory Processes, International Journal of Applied Research on Information Technology and Computing, 4:3, 2013, 99-121.

Predictive and Anticipatory Computing, in Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology, Second Edition DOI: 10.1081/E-ECST2-120054027
Copyright © 2017 by Taylor & Francis.

https://www.nadin.ws/archives/2972

via (PDF) G-Complexity, Quantum Computation and Anticipatory Processes

G-Complexity, Quantum Computation and Anticipatory Processes

January 2014, Mihai Nadin

Related research
Computation is the medium of contemporary science. To understand the consequences of this gnoseological and epistemological revolution, one has to evaluate the outcome. As sciences become computational, difficulties concerning data processing associated with knowledge acquisition and dissemination are reduced. The focus on data afforded a quantum leap in many domains, including computation itself. The word complexity became part of the modern scientific discourse as a result of our ability to capture more data, and to associate it with interactions characterized quantitatively. In the process, the notion of complexity itself lost its resolution. This study introduces the undecidable as a criterion for characterizing a particular type of complexity. Defined as G-complexity, it allows for the understanding of questions pertinent to knowledge about the world, in particular, the living. With decidability as a well-defined criterion for complexity, we provide a context for understanding how experimental evidence-the hallmark of science in our days-can be accumulated, and what the characteristics of scientific work are at this juncture in the development of science.

Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship | SCO – Initial Convening

A little bit of a confusing hodge-podge – a centre set up by Skoll at the Said Business School at Oxford University, which seems to have suddenly sprung to life with both a newsletter (copied at bottom) which links to a blog page (copied below) which has a bit of a different set of links.

via Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship | SCO – Initial Convening

 

SCO – Initial Convening

Latest blog update from the Skoll Centre’s main research initiative, the Systems Change Observatory.

In March 2019, we had a daylong session that integrated in-person attendance with contributions from participants around the world. This meeting incorporated opinions from previously conducted unstructured interviews to identify the most relevant issues and concerns regarding systems change among this first round of Observatory contributors.

The discussions raised were far from exhaustive. The value of this study lies in starting an exploration of topics that have not yet been systematically studied and understood with practitioners who, despite sharing similar concerns, are approaching problems differently.

Emergent themes

From our discussions, four key themes emerged:

  1. Definitions and conceptions of systems change
  2. The intersections of systems change, social entrepreneurship, and scaling solutions
  3. Implementing systems change
  4. Measurement and evaluation of systems change interventions.

The first two refer to the connections between systems change, social entrepreneurship and scaling-up an intervention in the social impact space.

Graph showing the top topics from interviews.

The last two themes consider the principles for designing and implementing systems change activities and the challenges in setting up measurement and evaluation instruments for system change interventions. Given the diverse experiences of our interviewees, our findings highlight different mechanisms, challenges and prospects to positively drive and evaluate system change. We will share snapshots on these themes to map relevant issues and spark deeper conversations.

Looking ahead

One of the salient issues in systems change work is the relative lack of over-time data on ventures that pursue a systems approach to social innovation. This limits our understanding of how system change is conceived and pursued to address a wide range of challenges. Beyond this initial study, the SCO intends to explore what happens in the life-course of these ventures, shedding light on aggregate patterns across ventures and over time.

The SCO can contribute by providing key outputs on systems change in action. This includes identifying the skills required to engage in systems change, approaches and pathways to change that organisations follow over time and their experience with implementation. This can help entrepreneurs identify what skills to build and activities in which to engage.

The ambition of the SCO is to add value to the field by keeping in mind the relevance of our research for our stakeholders. We intend to offer value by leveraging our academic skills to undertake translational research in order to produce, compile, and disseminate knowledge that can be useful for academics and practitioners in the field of systems change.

Stay up to date with the latest news and research insights from the Systems Change Observatory, sign up to receive the newsletter.

You might also like

Welcome

Welcome, system change colleagues, to the Systems Change Observatory (SCO) newsletter.

Systems change itself is a phrase that many are using more and more: Big challenges in the world have persuaded activists, policy makers, corporates, and researchers to ‘think big’ and to think in ‘whole system’ terms. The useful conversations now are to explore new ways of talking, understanding, and intervening – no one organization or community or even country can solve these challenges on their own. And the challenges themselves are outcomes from complex, interdependent, layered processes that often span jurisdictions.

Over the coming months we will highlight the ambitions of the SCO and themes that emerged from our initial convening in May 2019. At times we will ask for your contributions to add to our observations of the systems change landscape as it relates to education, research and practitioner knowledge and experiences.

Read on and we look forward to learning with you.
Prof Marc Ventresca
University of Oxford and Wolfson College

What is the Systems Change Observatory?

The Systems Change Observatory (SCO) is a research initiative of the Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship at Saïd Business School. The Observatory aims to provide a space for a wide range of stakeholders in systems change theory, policy and practice to discuss, share experiences and learn best ways to steer systems change practice to achieve positive social and environmental impact.

This research study explores pathways to systems change made visible in the starting points and initiatives of a large sample of ventures over time. The goal is to generate actionable insights, case studies and tools in support of systems change, both for practice and policy. The research integrates insights from organisational design and strategy, institutional and funding contexts, the work of leaders and broader venture ecosystems.

Getting started

In March 2019, we had a daylong session that integrated in-person attendance with contributions from participants around the world. This meeting incorporated opinions from previously conducted unstructured interviews to identify the most relevant issues and concerns regarding systems change among this first round of Observatory contributors.

Spotlight profile: Dr Paulo Savaget

Dr Paulo Savaget is the postdoctoral researcher for the Systems Change Observatory research initiative. Paulo works on the implementation of an applied research agenda focused on transforming unjust systems through social innovation and social entrepreneurship.

Useful resources

In each edition of this newsletter, we will share useful insightful resources related to systems change.
Practitioner Reports
Embracing Complexity – Towards a shared understanding of funding systems change.

Systems Leadership and Platforms: How to mobilize people to transform systems and build the platforms to scale these efforts By John Hagel and Gemma Mortensen.

Beyond Organisational Scale: How Social Entrepreneurs create systems Change.
Academic Paper

Ferraro, F., Etzion, D., & Gehman, J. (2015). Tackling Grand Challenges Pragmatically: Robust Action Revisited. Organization Studies, 36(3), 363–390.

Feedback from SIGNAL: Fostering the Emergence of System Leadership Worldwide session, part of the Skoll 2020 Virtual Forum

via SIGNAL@cocreative.com

Dear Systems Change Allies,

Thank you for joining us for the SIGNAL: Fostering the Emergence of System Leadership Worldwide session, part of the Skoll 2020 Virtual Forum.

We’re inspired by the interest and momentum in exploring together how we might support people doing systems change work around the world. SIGNAL is a step toward gaining actionable insight into what these diverse folks need to deepen, quicken, and sustain their work on our most complex challenges.

Would you like to get involved in SIGNAL? Please let us know. As we shared in the session, SIGNAL is a collaborative research initiative and as we advance the project, we want to connect more and more partners into the learning, sharing, and action.

Would you like to learn more about SIGNAL? Here’s how:

  • Get the information deck we shared online, which also includes some information on Illuminate, the parent initiative of SIGNAL (and you can learn more about Illuminate here). You’ll find more information about SIGNAL plans and partners, as well as some early insights from our first interviews.
  • See and share the recording of the session.
  • Skim and comment on the session outputs in this shared document, including participant reflections, resources shared during the session, and more about who attended—and feel free to comment and add more!

You can find out more about the session’s presenters here:

In gratitude and collaboration,
The SIGNAL Collective

P.S. See some of what emerged below, more in our shared notes.

Please note: This is the only email you’ll receive about SIGNAL unless you opted in to receiving future project updates.
Visual scribing by Katherine Haugh at Global Knowledge Initiative.
“In one work, what’s one value you’re bringing to our session today?”
“Where are you joining from today?”

Systems Thinking & Sustainability – Systems Innovation – online session 6 April 2020, CORRECTION 11am London time (BST/GMT+1)

(WAS listed as 6pm)

Guest speakers

Rika Preiser

Ray Ison

Louis Klein

via Systems Thinking & Sustainability – Systems Innovation

A massive expansion in demographics, technology, and economic activity has ushered in the age of the Anthropocene as the new reality of the 21st century. As more of us pack into cities, as technology becomes ever more pervasive and we alter Earth systems on an ever-larger scale, the systems that now surround us and coordinate our everyday lives are no longer given by nature but instead created by us. The complex sustainability challenges of a water crisis, energy transition, climate change or pollution are the product of the very systems we create and support our way of life, with these systems in turn created and sustained by our ways of looking at the world, our paradigm. This insight has lead many to the conclusion that a shift to a more sustainable world will start with a shift in our ways of thinking to a way that helps us to better see and act in relation to the whole – the promise of systems thinking. In this talk we will explore the relationship between systems thinki

(View Full Event Description Here: https://systemsinnovation.io/event/systems-thinking-sustainability/)

Theory – Legitimation Code Theory (and Semantic Waves)

From the same source as ‘the Threshold Concept’ (https://stream.syscoi.com/2019/12/03/the-threshold-concept-an-introduction-and-overview-to-the-concept/) – the wonderful Martin McNamara at UCD (@celticowl):

via Theory – Legitimation Code Theory (How To Teach Powerful Things)

Semantic Waves

Semantic waves – repack!

 

 

 

Map–territory relation – Wikipedia

I’m usually pretty allergic to discussions about map/territory relationships – they usually devolve to being as simplistic as the average discussion about ‘mental models’ (to which my default response is: there aren’t models and they aren’t mental, but it’s a 50%-decent metaphor) – but this is a good summary.

via Map–territory relation – Wikipedia

As so often, the best insight is in the Bateson quote:

We say the map is different from the territory. But what is the territory? Operationally, somebody went out with a retina or a measuring stick and made representations which were then put on paper. What is on the paper map is a representation of what was in the retinal representation of the man who made the map; and as you push the question back, what you find is an infinite regress, an infinite series of maps. The territory never gets in at all. … Always, the process of representation will filter it out so that the mental world is only maps of maps, ad infinitum.

See also:

https://stream.syscoi.com/2019/12/28/a-curriculum-for-meta-rationality-what-they-dont-teach-you-at-stem-school-meaningness-and-some-summary-posts-on-david-chapmans-ideas/

Core Art of Hosting Practices – The Art of Hosting

Perhaps not truly systems thinking but a powerful set of practices.

The groan zone journey: https://amandafenton.com/2013/12/the-groan-zone-journey/

Seven little helpers for dialogue and action: http://www.chriscorrigan.com/parkinglot/seven-little-helpers-for-dialogue-and-action-part-5-make-a-wise-decision/

Breath pattern: https://www.mnartofhosting.com/breath-pattern.html

Core concepts: http://francois.thunus.org/aohCoreConcepts.htm

 

via Core Art of Hosting Practices – The Art of HostingThe Art of Hosting

Core Art of Hosting Practices

Work in progress!

As you may notice, this page is getting step-by-step to completion. More gets added as time passes by…

[headlines only – click link above for content:]

CORE METHODOLOGIES:

CIRCLE PRACTICE (The Circle Way)

THE WORLD CAFE

OPEN SPACE TECHNOLOGY

PRO ACTION CAFE

COLLECTIVE STORY HARVESTING

BASIC ART OF HOSTING PATTERNS for PROCESS DESIGN:

THE FOUR-FOLD(ed) PRACTICE

CHAORDIC PATH

WICKED QUESTIONS

DIVERGENCE – EMERGENCE – CONVERGENCE

HARVESTING

APPRECIATIVE INQUIRY

MORE COMPLEX PROCESS DESIGN: 

CHAORDIC STEPPING STONES

BREATHS OF PROCESS DESIGN

AND MORE:

WORLDVIEW

STORYTELLING

COMMUNITY

Compiled by Ria Baeck

 

Learning Focusing: the Classic Six Steps | International Focusing Institute

Other links:

An Introduction to Focusing

About Eugene Gendlin: https://www.eugenegendlin.com/about

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Gendlin

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focusing_(psychotherapy)

 

via Learning Focusing: the Classic Six Steps | International Focusing Institute

Learning Focusing: The Classic Six Steps

These Six Steps are also available in:

Nederlands (Dutch)  |  Deutsch (German)  |  Español (Spanish)
עברית (Hebrew)  |  Italiano (Italian)  |  Português (Portuguese)
日本語 (Japanese)   |  Dansk (Danish)  |  Suomi (Finnish)

Most people find it easier to learn Focusing through individual instruction than through simply reading about it. The actual process of Focusing, experienced from the inside, is fluid and open, allowing great room for individual differences and ways of working.

Yet to introduce the concepts and flavor of the technique, some structure can be useful. We offer one approach here: six steps. Although these steps may provide a window into Focusing, it is important to remember that they are not the six steps. Focusing has no rigid, fixed agenda for the inner world; many Focusing sessions bear little resemblance to the technical process that we define here. Still, every Certified Focusing Professional (Trainer) is deeply familiar with these six steps, and uses them as needed throughout a Focusing session. Many people have had success getting in touch with the heart of the process just by following these simple instructions.

So, with the caveat that what follows is a simple scaffolding for you to use as long as it’s useful and then to move beyond, we offer to you six steps, a taste of the process.


What follows is a lightly edited excerpt from The Focusing Manual, chapter four of Focusing by Eugene Gendlin.

The inner act of Focusing can be broken down into six main sub-acts or movements. As you gain more practice, you won’t need to think of these as six separate parts of the process. To think of them as separate movements makes the process seem more mechanical than it is—or will be, for you, later. I have subdivided the process in this way because I’ve learned from years of experimenting that this is one of the effective ways to teach Focusing to people who have never tried it before.

Think of this as only the basics. As you progress and learn more about Focusing you will add to these basic instructions, clarify them, and approach them from other angles. Eventually—perhaps not the first time you go through it—you will have the experience of something shifting inside.

So here are the Focusing instructions in brief form, manual style. If you want to try them out, do so easily, gently. If you find difficulty in one step or another, don’t push too hard; just move on to the next one. You can always come back.

Clearing A Space

What I will ask you to do will be silent, just to yourself. Take a moment just to relax . . . All right—now, inside you, I would like you to pay attention inwardly, in your body, perhaps in your stomach or chest. Now see what comes there when you ask, “How is my life going? What is the main thing for me right now?” Sense within your body. Let the answers come slowly from this sensing. When some concern comes, DO NOT GO INSIDE IT. Stand back, say “Yes, that’s there. I can feel that, there.” Let there be a little space between you and that. Then ask what else you feel. Wait again, and sense. Usually there are several things.

Felt Sense

From among what came, select one personal problem to focus on. DO NOT GO INSIDE IT. Stand back from it. Of course, there are many parts to that one thing you are thinking about—too many to think of each one alone. But you can feel all of these things together. Pay attention there where you usually feel things, and in there you can get a sense of what all of the problem feels like. Let yourself feel the unclear sense of all of that.

Handle

What is the quality of this unclear felt sense? Let a word, a phrase, or an image come up from the felt sense itself. It might be a quality-word, like tight, sticky, scary, stuck, heavy, jumpy or a phrase, or an image. Stay with the quality of the felt sense till something fits it just right.

Resonating

Go back and forth between the felt sense and the word (phrase, or image). Check how they resonate with each other. See if there is a little bodily signal that lets you know there is a fit. To do it, you have to have the felt sense there again, as well as the word. Let the felt sense change, if it does, and also the word or picture, until they feel just right in capturing the quality of the felt sense.

Asking

Now ask: what is it, about this whole problem, that makes this quality (which you have just named or pictured)? Make sure the quality is sensed again, freshly, vividly (not just remembered from before). When it is here again, tap it, touch it, be with it, asking, “What makes the whole problem so           ?” Or you ask, “What is in this sense?”

If you get a quick answer without a shift in the felt sense, just let that kind of answer go by. Return your attention to your body and freshly find the felt sense again. Then ask it again.

Be with the felt sense till something comes along with a shift, a slight “give” or release.

Receiving

Receive whatever comes with a shift in a friendly way. Stay with it a while, even if it is only a slight release. Whatever comes, this is only one shift; there will be others. You will probably continue after a little while, but stay here for a few moments.

IF DURING THESE INSTRUCTIONS SOMEWHERE YOU HAVE SPENT A LITTLE WHILE SENSING AND TOUCHING AN UNCLEAR HOLISTIC BODY SENSE OF THIS PROBLEM, THEN YOU HAVE FOCUSED. It doesn’t matter whether the body-shift came or not. It comes on its own. We don’t control that.

Instructions For Not Following Instructions

Isn’t it wrong to publish instructions for inward personal process?

One danger with a set of instructions is that people might use them to close off other ways. Anything human involves more than one method. Please notice, we don’t say that this method is all you need or might find valuable. Had we said that, we hope you would have thought us stupid.

Anything you learn here can go well with anything else that you may find helpful. If there seems to be a contradiction, go easy. Let your own steps find the way to reconcile the contradiction.

There are other reasons one might not like specifics, such as these steps. Instructions may seem to diminish mystery and openness, although that is not so.

Also, written instructions cannot avoid misunderstandings. No formula fits every person. Anyway, one must find one’s own path.

These problems occur with all types of knowledge about humans.

Adopt a “split-level” approach to all instructions: On the one hand follow the instructions exactly, so that you can discover the experiences to which they point. On the other hand be sensitive to yourself and your own body. Assume that only sound expansive experiences are worth having. The moment doing it feels wrong in your body, stop following the instruction, and back up slightly. Stay there with your attention until you can sense exactly what is going wrong.

These are very exact instructions for how not to follow instructions!

And, of course, they apply to themselves, as well.

In this way you will find your own body’s steps, either through the instructions, or through what is wrong with them.

Focusing is always like that: You don’t push on if it doesn’t feel right, but you don’t run away either. You go no further, but you back up only a little, so that you stay until what is in the way becomes clear.

Focusing is quite safe. It may not work but it is not negative. So, if you sense something that does not feel life-forwarding and sound in your body, sense what that is until that opens.

But isn’t it the height of self-contradiction to give exact steps for how not to follow instructions? Indeed. One often needs several attitudes at once.

In a society increasingly skilled at human processes, of course we share the specifics we learn. Shall we teach the specifics of driving a car and not the specifics of finding and opening the bodily felt sense? But, human processes do give rise to more different specifics than can be logically consistent. Human nature is not fixed and not knowable in some single system. That is fortunate. No knowledge can push you out of the driver’s seat of your life. Especially not our knowledge here, which is to be about finding your own process!

Therefore this knowledge, here, must arrange for itself to be superseded by you, as you sense for what feels sound, inside you. Instructions for not following instructions are the essence of Focusing—one’s own inwardly opening steps.

If you stop and sense what’s wrong at any point, and if you wait there until that opens and reveals itself, you can make good use of all sorts of methods and instructions. You do any method better than its authors can arrange.